Moderator: Community Team
100 dollars, isn't that just the price of premium for all of them?timmytuttut88 wrote:Twill says that they get to come back if we pay him 100 dollars. He makes a bunch of nonexistant claims and expects us to believe them. Basically they are 100% innocent but theres no way the moderation will actually listen.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
Yes.diddle wrote:100 dollars, isn't that just the price of premium for all of them?timmytuttut88 wrote:Twill says that they get to come back if we pay him 100 dollars. He makes a bunch of nonexistant claims and expects us to believe them. Basically they are 100% innocent but theres no way the moderation will actually listen.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
This isn't the same as that. These guy traded information without a legitimate cause such as account sitting to infiltrate a private user group. If it were DaGip who was in trouble for posting on someone else's account while account sitting he could appeal it and he would probably be forgiven but his topic isn't relevant to this.jonesthecurl wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:I was "listening" ...clapper011 wrote: lol, it has been clarified already before twill's post, just no one wanted to listen.
but specifically, I meant right in the rules. Sometimes it is not enough to feel rules are clear .. sometimes you have to go out of your way to make sure they really are clear to virtually everyone. I am just saying that a line or two added to the rules will save you all some headaches. I, for one, would not have posted if I had understood the rule to be what it is from the start.
And I say again, that in August last year, DaGip started a thread called "Can Babysitters Post", which ran for three pages without a single mod or admin thinking the topic was important enough to require any comment.
Suddenly it's a dreadful sin.
The other weapon customers of the website (paid customers) is the better business bureau. You can go the website and file actual complaints vs the parent company if you feel that strongly. I think to be held hostage until they repay is bad business. Telling people to "leave if you don't like it" is even worse. Lack is running a profitable business here. The fact that they have shut down "negative websites" and blogs to continue to rope people in as new members, and then make you buy back in after bans, is HORRIBLE business.timmytuttut88 wrote:Yes.diddle wrote:100 dollars, isn't that just the price of premium for all of them?timmytuttut88 wrote:Twill says that they get to come back if we pay him 100 dollars. He makes a bunch of nonexistant claims and expects us to believe them. Basically they are 100% innocent but theres no way the moderation will actually listen.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
Wrong. Two of them have already had premium bought for them by someone else.diddle wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but all those in question who are banned need to do to return is pay for premium?
Twill wrote:Let me make one thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
THERE WAS NO PERMABAN
I love hugely annoying fonts at times of whiny misconception
Yes, but YOU'RE STILL WRONG!!!
They shouldn't have to buy back what was not yours to take away.
At any rate that would be admitting to doing something wrong wouldn't it?
Let me make a second thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
If we were trying to get rid of them, we simply would have banned them, not concocted some convoluted and ridiculous multi accusation. I for one have clearly never shied away from pissing everyone off, so why would I bother busting them when they can just buy back in? If I wanted them gone I would have just banned em.
Let me make a third thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
The mods didn't do this, and they aren't paid (although the deserve it for putting up with a lot of the crap they do). They are volunteers and deserve your respect.
I pressed the bust button after looking into the case. If you have a problem, come talk to me.
How many times?
Let me make a fourth thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
The rule clearly states that you will only have 1 account. Enough of "the rules apply to part a of the site but not part b" crap. The rule is the rule is the rule.
And they want to claim that using multiple accounts (that's right they each USED more than one account, regardless of who created it) to troll a PRIVATE usergroup, which is hosted on THIS website is kosher? Please. Come back when you have something better than that.
You and Nightstrike are the only ones who think like this. Have you ever wondered why? How can you be in charge when no one believes in what you're doing?
Now, let me make this last point perfectly 100% crystal clear.
They can buy back if they want. This is NOT a permaban. If THEY want to appeal this they can. If YOU don't like the way this site is moderated or run, vote with your feet and leave. If you don't want to leave, quit whining and deal with it.
I'd like to vote my foot into your face. No one is whining here, this is an exchange of information. And since you don't like it, why don't you just stop embarrassing CC and STFU & GTFO?
You think that just because we don't have any recourse for 12 months you can act so smuge?
Twill
DM and Snorri bailed out by Curmudgeon who generously footed the bill for their safe release.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
I doubt it will be hard to find someone to pay for suggs.mandyb wrote:DM and Snorri bailed out by Curmudgeon who generously footed the bill for their safe release.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
I can't honestly say I'm all that happy about it though. It may well be good to get the boys home, but at quite a price....and I don't mean just a monetary one.
Having said that; Twill, how much will it cost me to buy back Norse?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Twill a JF? That's news to me.Juan_Bottom wrote:Twill wrote:Let me make one thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
THERE WAS NO PERMABAN
I love hugely annoying fonts at times of whiny misconception
Yes, but YOU'RE STILL WRONG!!!
They shouldn't have to buy back what was not yours to take away.
At any rate that would be admitting to doing something wrong wouldn't it?
Let me make a second thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
If we were trying to get rid of them, we simply would have banned them, not concocted some convoluted and ridiculous multi accusation. I for one have clearly never shied away from pissing everyone off, so why would I bother busting them when they can just buy back in? If I wanted them gone I would have just banned em.
Let me make a third thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
The mods didn't do this, and they aren't paid (although the deserve it for putting up with a lot of the crap they do). They are volunteers and deserve your respect.
I pressed the bust button after looking into the case. If you have a problem, come talk to me.
How many times?
Let me make a fourth thing perfectly, 100%, crystal clear.
The rule clearly states that you will only have 1 account. Enough of "the rules apply to part a of the site but not part b" crap. The rule is the rule is the rule.
And they want to claim that using multiple accounts (that's right they each USED more than one account, regardless of who created it) to troll a PRIVATE usergroup, which is hosted on THIS website is kosher? Please. Come back when you have something better than that.
You and Nightstrike are the only ones who think like this. Have you ever wondered why? How can you be in charge when no one believes in what you're doing?
Now, let me make this last point perfectly 100% crystal clear.
They can buy back if they want. This is NOT a permaban. If THEY want to appeal this they can. If YOU don't like the way this site is moderated or run, vote with your feet and leave. If you don't want to leave, quit whining and deal with it.
I'd like to vote my foot into your face. No one is whining here, this is an exchange of information. And since you don't like it, why don't you just stop embarrassing CC and STFU & GTFO?
You think that just because we don't have any recourse for 12 months you can act so smuge?
Twill
Am I the only one noticing that NS and Twitler are the only vocal mod supporters of the ban? Twill, a member of the Jesus Freaks, and NS a conservative Christian too? Is this a case of "I am holier than thou art?" Are Twill and NS actually being Bigots here themselves? I'm not sure... But I know that they are twisting rules to suit their purpose.
Fastposted by jbrettlip!
And yup, I'm doing it.
Who?GabonX wrote:Wrong. Two of them have already had premium bought for them by someone else.diddle wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but all those in question who are banned need to do to return is pay for premium?
Juan, I normally respect your posts, but I think you are reaching here ... There may be issues, but I don't think Twill, NS and Twitler being Christians is it. I suspect it is more that their forums are partially where the problems occured.Juan_Bottom wrote: Am I the only one noticing that NS and Twitler are the only vocal mod supporters of the ban? Twill, a member of the Jesus Freaks, and NS a conservative Christian too? Is this a case of "I am holier than thou art?" Are Twill and NS actually being Bigots here themselves? I'm not sure... But I know that they are twisting rules to suit their purpose.
diddlers, look up a few posts and read will ya?diddle wrote:Who?GabonX wrote:Wrong. Two of them have already had premium bought for them by someone else.diddle wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but all those in question who are banned need to do to return is pay for premium?
I'll contribute to Norse's fund.mandyb wrote:DM and Snorri bailed out by Curmudgeon who generously footed the bill for their safe release.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
I can't honestly say I'm all that happy about it though. It may well be good to get the boys home, but at quite a price....and I don't mean just a monetary one.
Having said that; Twill, how much will it cost me to buy back Norse?
Suggs was actually banned, no possibility of remission.Neoteny wrote:I doubt it will be hard to find someone to pay for suggs.mandyb wrote:DM and Snorri bailed out by Curmudgeon who generously footed the bill for their safe release.diddle wrote:Wow, there was 5 pages in this thread before I went to school...
Anyone wanna sum up the last 10 pages and give details of any progressions to the situation?
I can't honestly say I'm all that happy about it though. It may well be good to get the boys home, but at quite a price....and I don't mean just a monetary one.
Having said that; Twill, how much will it cost me to buy back Norse?
walkies!If he were, we'd know.mpjh wrote:I thought Norse was already back.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Last time I spoke to him he didnt voice any interest in coming back.mandyb wrote:If he were, we'd know.mpjh wrote:I thought Norse was already back.
Hey, no speaking on behalf of a banned person.diddle wrote:Last time I spoke to him he didnt voice any interest in coming back.mandyb wrote:If he were, we'd know.mpjh wrote:I thought Norse was already back.
If Thor was Norse, Norse was over-rated (again, Norse was before my time)mpjh wrote:Then who is this guy Thor that keeps posting Nazi crap?
