Moderator: Community Team



The smart thing to do is what he did imo. He made a claim about charm linked with streaker. Because if he used his wand on a vt and died, we wouldn't know. I'm positive he used it on streaker because that would provide the most information. Specially since he saw streaker as scum if charm was scum.strike wolf wrote:Well I suppose GT could have been telling the truth. I am going to wait on what streaker says. The smarter thing for Mtam to do would have been to test one of the claimed wandless but that doesnt mean he did it. For the record I tried to protect Mtam last night.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.


I'm gonna trust mtam on this one. Vote: Streakermtamburini wrote:IF charm flips scum lynch streaker the next day.
Looking back, I only see the stolen vote being used twice, and when it was used it stayed there until the end of the day. I wonder if they can only use the vote once and then it stays there? Would make it a bit weaker of a power, and maybe a reason why they haven't used it too readily. Would also give more weight to storr's argument that mitch is town because scum tried to lynch him with that vote. However charm (and streaker) weren't voting mitch at the time... so who knows stillEndgame422 wrote: Ya im just curious if imperio was perhaps innate to charm or not as we could look at where that stolen vote went for more on charm.
How do you think it is untestable?Endgame422 wrote:I guess we wait for tomorrow to hear streakers answer.
His post certainly implied he had not lost his wand although if his action was really to force me and HS to use our actions on each other there wouldnt be any proof anyway so its fairly untestable.
Chances mtam tried to disarm someone else?
Still waiting for you to explain how strike is scum by my only town can use other town wands logic storr.

StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
If he is scum I'll be laughing for a while at the death eaters being defeated by typos.Streaker wrote: I am Professor Filius Fitwick.
Each night, I may target a player and use Confundus on him. When 2 players are targeted, they will direct their (if any) actions on each other the night of the second confundo.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I was waiting for Streaker's detailed post... I'm busy today but may have a bit of time tonight (after Japan beats England) to dig into it a bit. I've been somewhat skimming for quite a while now (my apologies) and don't have nearly as good of a grasp on the game as I'd prefer. That said, I don't like some of Streaker's posts and will try to qualify my feeling a bit more today or tomorrow.strike wolf wrote:I want to know what Mudpuppy thinks. Something isnt sitting right with me and I am not sure what.
Your mumStorrZerg wrote:Dazza who are you on tonight
Who did I target last night or are you asking who I will tonight?StorrZerg wrote:Dazza who are you on tonight
