Moderator: Community Team

Its becoming quickly apparent that RD does not care to put the effort forth to play the game the way its meant to be played. We should all cater to her demands and remind her every other post that there is more than one page and it could behoove her to read through what has been said more than once.StorrZerg wrote:how about you read my posts, see when i ask questions (i've asked you a lot)
then quote my quote, and respond.
Here you can sort posts by "author" go to the section with all my posts! that will make it super easy to respond to.
This shows you don't know Nark's playstyle. He's always like this. This also seems typical of your style to pick on someone for a small misinterpretation.BAM! Overreaction to a simple vote onto him, X-Stor-X did not rage at 4 votes, Anark seems a bit edgy with a single vote on him on Day 1.
And so I find this a little uncalled for. If we're going to have this much discussion on metagaming, we should actually, y'know, do it.So where to cast my vote, jak, for his poor case on Nark, or Nark for his poor reaction on the poor case. vote jak this doesn't say Nark is blameless but I do believe that the origins of jak's case of Nark, are poor, and this does partially justify Nark's reaction.
I agree with this in principle, though what happened on Storr was actually exceedingly fast.I think it's amazing anyone claims or gets lynched in these games, since it's apparently a crime to make the 3rd or 4th vote on someone. While yes, sometimes scum could bandwagon to get a quick lynch, I think often it's town who are just convinced by previous arguments on the person enough to want to see a claim. I mean isn't that the whole point of an argument is to convince other people to join you in voting that person? Sorry for the little rant, I'm just often afraid of voting for cases that I think have decent merit just because I know if I do that 2-3 times I'll get railroaded as a bandwagonner...
Though if he'll go with it, more power to him...The case against me is indefensible, I accept it as a case, and would claim at L-2.
...what?Roger Dodger wrote:Well maybe I'm wrong but, what is right and what is wrong? The fact here is that at this point everyone is suspect. Sometimes u gotta shake the tree and see what falls. Regardless, I am sticking to my vote. Now, by being defensive of Jonty, could u all be part of the team to make this town mafia land? I will look back at Jonty other games and see if it is in fact a true statement. Vote stays.
THE SECOND PART IS MY QUOTE THAT HE FAILED TO QUOTE CORRECTLY ffs are you not reading my posts????
my last post explained his post.
Lol.ignore that i wasn't reading your post correctly.
Spiesr addressed this quote, but this goes both ways. You could be pushing for information on how best to use SCUM night actions, not just for the greater good. That makes it a null statement on its own, but calling it for town is the greater sin. Also, saying you don't want a lynch D1 is pretty scummy in general. I only vote No Lynch D1 if there's A LOT of info on the table (like mass claim D1, it's happened).I am not pushing for a lynch Day 1 like the real scum do, I am pushing for information that we can use in the night to better use any actions people may have to help town out better tomorrow.
...why again?Hell, folks, lemme help you all out... Since most of you are being absolutely ridiculous, I will jump up and claim now... Guess what? I am a vanilla townie, and so not to quote my PM, I am a Peasant... That isn't what the title says, it mentions village... So, folks, way to out a Vanilla Townie!
Why, when there's time to spare? As I said, I need a lot of info on the table to advocate D1 No Lynch, but this ain't it.rishaed wrote:vote No lynch. The reasons are simple.
1. I have reason to believe both claims, and Jonty wouldn't be claiming a town vig this early, unless its a elaborate ploy by scum.
2. The night tonight will give us a lot of information. (How many killing factions and so on).
3. I don't know why Jak wants jonty to kill tonight. He has practically no information, and its worse than a mislynch, if he shoots wrong, because we don't get any voting information from it.
4. With two factions I don't know how many mislynches are available to town before they cannot win.
The game here has evolved greatly in the past 5-6 years. As someone who watched the culture develop, I can say the acronyms and jargon we use now would be very out of place back when.Never played with her but she appears to have had some decent activity in the CC mafia forum 5-6 years ago and has just recently returned. So, I think she should have knowledge of the basic terminology but perhaps its not quite like riding a bicycle.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
The amount of time and effort you put into complaining and random crap, would have been enough to get a straight point across.Roger Dodger wrote:At the end I must say thank u. For I really don't have the time to be sitting thru all this dialog. I did ask the originator of this mafia game to get someone else but it seems I'm done anyway. It was a mistake on my part to think that the mafia games of years back would not have evolved into so much. I commend those that have the time and patience to read, read and read. Also, it seems the days have become way too long. Have fun kids. Later


I realize that, and criticized his unwillingness to defend himself on it. That said, I think that may be the only reason the wagon on him got as far as it did.StorrZerg wrote:@pcm started out as something small on jonty.. and it didn't get swatted down. All he simple had to do was link a contradiction. Instead his reactions and how he continued to play after that was very odd, which is why i kept pushing.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Unacceptable... tee hee!superkeener wrote:Some things came up, so the D2 start will be pushed back at least a few more hours.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
My guess is both the mafia and the doc targeted the only known power role so far, jonty, which is why the mafia didn't make a kill. That or there is a busdriver that switched jonty with rishaed, and the third faction doesn't kill. Either way, I don't expect anyone to come forward.jak111 wrote:Interesting that Mafia did not make a kill. (They did not kill their own surely).
If we have a roleblocker, you might wish to speak up, because I think you may have role-blocked the mafia that attempted to make their kill. (or any other role that could potentially stop the kill, unless doc, doc stays quiet).
Also, Anark's claim is either proved right or proved wrong, depending if there are multiples of the same name (Villager - VT). With no real names to go with them to tell them apart. But for now we can let that slide, might find out when another VT dies.
As far as who died, it's a simple Goon, so mafia PR still possibility out there.
Anyone with night info they're willing to share?
FP'd twice.
Does not mean you're not another bad faction Anark.
FP'd by Super
THERE IS THE SCENE...
