cena-rules wrote:I just noticed, in the vote count it said we only had 7 votes on him, obviously because someone is voteless. Im not suspicious of him, but I just spotted it
pmchugh wrote:ACTUALLY THE OFFICIAL AND PROPER Vote Count!
Ok right, So falko isn't proven about his L+1 ability at all. So FOS Falko and CW
I say we lynch one or the other and see what happens. CW would be my choice. If he turns out to be townie, then it looks bad for falko.
BTW, is that common for someone to not have a vote in a maf game? Noob ?
shut the hell up¡¡...what's wrong with you??? you don't think so "Oh my freaking god" coincidential that I claimed to need +1 vote to be lynched, and then miraculously appears a voteless townie voting by me???? Distraction. That's all you have.
OK lets see
1) you claim to need +1
2) we have a voteless townie
3) they voted for you therefore #1 is not proven
cena-rules wrote:I just noticed, in the vote count it said we only had 7 votes on him, obviously because someone is voteless. Im not suspicious of him, but I just spotted it
pmchugh wrote:ACTUALLY THE OFFICIAL AND PROPER Vote Count!
Ok right, So falko isn't proven about his L+1 ability at all. So FOS Falko and CW
I say we lynch one or the other and see what happens. CW would be my choice. If he turns out to be townie, then it looks bad for falko.
BTW, is that common for someone to not have a vote in a maf game? Noob ?
shut the hell up¡¡...what's wrong with you??? you don't think so "Oh my freaking god" coincidential that I claimed to need +1 vote to be lynched, and then miraculously appears a voteless townie voting by me???? Distraction. That's all you have.
Whoa. Freak out much.
I'm not liking this response at all. I wasn't overly suspicious before, and I didn't see the need to try the 8 votes again, but after this outburst I'm not so sure. vote falko
cena-rules wrote:I just noticed, in the vote count it said we only had 7 votes on him, obviously because someone is voteless. Im not suspicious of him, but I just spotted it
pmchugh wrote:ACTUALLY THE OFFICIAL AND PROPER Vote Count!
Ok right, So falko isn't proven about his L+1 ability at all. So FOS Falko and CW
I say we lynch one or the other and see what happens. CW would be my choice. If he turns out to be townie, then it looks bad for falko.
BTW, is that common for someone to not have a vote in a maf game? Noob ?
shut the hell up¡¡...what's wrong with you??? you don't think so "Oh my freaking god" coincidential that I claimed to need +1 vote to be lynched, and then miraculously appears a voteless townie voting by me???? Distraction. That's all you have.
Whoa. Freak out much.
I'm not liking this response at all. I wasn't overly suspicious before, and I didn't see the need to try the 8 votes again, but after this outburst I'm not so sure. vote falko
It depends on pmc I think, does he let Falko start at -1 votes to make things consistent and have him lynched when 9 people have voted for him (8 counted votes from 9 people), or does he need half the votes +1 before being lynched (9 counted votes from 9 people). The result is the same, but it would look quite different to us.
Also consider the probability of Falko claiming to need an additional vote to be lynched and there being a voteless townie who would appear to corroborate his claim. If you really want to find out whether someone is voteless or not, I say everyone votes for the next person on the list and the last votes for the first, if someone has no votes against them we'll know who the voteless townie is.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
it just seems like we are in the same freaking d1. There is nothing more worth to pursue that check once again that I need a vote more to be lynchethat the rest ot the town? Jeeezzz
Falkomagno wrote:it just seems like we are in the same freaking d1. There is nothing more worth to pursue that check once again that I need a vote more to be lynchethat the rest ot the town? Jeeezzz
we have no leads
you havent been cleared yet
therefore you are as good a candidate as anyone plus we have a way of checking to see if your claim is real
I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
e_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or not
e_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or not
Then let's use my method, everyone votes for the person below them on the list on page 1 (if pmc has updated it, that is), if one person has 0 votes against them we'll know who is voteless. (i.e. the person above the person with 0 votes against)
If the voteless person voted for Falko "yesterday" we can repeat the experiment of giving him 8 votes and seeing if he lives, otherwise we can let it be. Since we don't know how pmc calculates votes against Falko (if Falko is telling the truth) it could be that Falko would be lynched if people keep adding votes until pmc counts 8 against him.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
e_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or not
Then let's use my method, everyone votes for the person below them on the list on page 1 (if pmc has updated it, that is), if one person has 0 votes against them we'll know who is voteless. (i.e. the person above the person with 0 votes against)
If the voteless person voted for Falko "yesterday" we can repeat the experiment of giving him 8 votes and seeing if he lives, otherwise we can let it be. Since we don't know how pmc calculates votes against Falko (if Falko is telling the truth) it could be that Falko would be lynched if people keep adding votes until pmc counts 8 against him.
problem there is not everyone is active, but its worth a shot
e_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or not
Then let's use my method, everyone votes for the person below them on the list on page 1 (if pmc has updated it, that is), if one person has 0 votes against them we'll know who is voteless. (i.e. the person above the person with 0 votes against)
If the voteless person voted for Falko "yesterday" we can repeat the experiment of giving him 8 votes and seeing if he lives, otherwise we can let it be. Since we don't know how pmc calculates votes against Falko (if Falko is telling the truth) it could be that Falko would be lynched if people keep adding votes until pmc counts 8 against him.
e_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or not
Then let's use my method, everyone votes for the person below them on the list on page 1 (if pmc has updated it, that is), if one person has 0 votes against them we'll know who is voteless. (i.e. the person above the person with 0 votes against)
If the voteless person voted for Falko "yesterday" we can repeat the experiment of giving him 8 votes and seeing if he lives, otherwise we can let it be. Since we don't know how pmc calculates votes against Falko (if Falko is telling the truth) it could be that Falko would be lynched if people keep adding votes until pmc counts 8 against him.
Well if We do this then I Vote stroop as hes the one below me on the list
strokem1257 wrote:There is no point in doing it til PMC gets back... How are we to know if OUR vote count is correct...?
When will PMC be back if you know?
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I agree with medefe. We don't know how Pmc was counting the votes against falko. But, if everyone is agreed to this, then fine, i'll be in the experiment. unvote vote cowboy
Personally, I see no need to find a voteless townie. Does that help us at all?
And I think we are only wasting the day away if we try to lynch falko again. We did it once yesterday and it didn't work, why would it be any different today?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I agree with medefe. We don't know how Pmc was counting the votes against falko. But, if everyone is agreed to this, then fine, i'll be in the experiment. unvote vote cowboy
Personally, I see no need to find a voteless townie. Does that help us at all?
And I think we are only wasting the day away if we try to lynch falko again. We did it once yesterday and it didn't work, why would it be any different today?
Well, if we find the voteless townie that's one person we can be fairly certain we shouldn't lynch.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
pmchugh wrote:Ok im back. VC soon, although someone else could help Then i will just correct it.
And fix the list of players, please.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Sorry for all the lurking guys....I don't have much to add - it's all somewhat confusing with all the actions and roles...I thought this was a newbie game
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
Mr. Squirrel wrote:I agree with medefe. We don't know how Pmc was counting the votes against falko. But, if everyone is agreed to this, then fine, i'll be in the experiment. unvote vote cowboy
Personally, I see no need to find a voteless townie. Does that help us at all?
And I think we are only wasting the day away if we try to lynch falko again. We did it once yesterday and it didn't work, why would it be any different today?
Either way we are gonna find a voteless townie or not. So this should shed some light on falko's story. I think he prob is telling the truth, hence the anger. But we cant be sure of it will we figure out how that last vote count was counted.
e_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or not
Then let's use my method, everyone votes for the person below them on the list on page 1 (if pmc has updated it, that is), if one person has 0 votes against them we'll know who is voteless. (i.e. the person above the person with 0 votes against)
If the voteless person voted for Falko "yesterday" we can repeat the experiment of giving him 8 votes and seeing if he lives, otherwise we can let it be. Since we don't know how pmc calculates votes against Falko (if Falko is telling the truth) it could be that Falko would be lynched if people keep adding votes until pmc counts 8 against him.
problem there is not everyone is active, but its worth a shot
... I've done quite a bit of pondering on this game 
Then i will just correct it.
