You are a mascochist? Or perhaps a Sadist?2dimes wrote:Wait, if it's sad why did I giggle?
..or simply so tired that everything seems funny?
Moderator: Community Team
You are a mascochist? Or perhaps a Sadist?2dimes wrote:Wait, if it's sad why did I giggle?
But you see, according to your own logic, you are the un evolving fool that still sits in a cave wondering why the sky fire goes out everyday and who lights it in the morning. Just show me to the link that refutes the language of dolphins and I will worship the sky fire with you... you stupid ass.KLOBBER wrote:Nothing at all -- it has to do with you being completely crazy and completely wrong, and also completely retarded.captain.crazy wrote:Yes, I am completely Crazy. I know that. What does that have to do with me being completely right and you being completely retarded?KLOBBER wrote:Captain Crazy lives up to his name and then some, and Morph continues to post gibberish that can't even be accurately referred to as English.
Sad.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Science requires proof. You have none.KLOBBER wrote: I am not challenging science -- I am championing it.
KLOBBER wrote:Yeah??? Well anyone who disagrees with me is just a big poopy face.
So there.

I guess the same reason why any little girl giggles -- it's just what you do!2dimes wrote:Wait, if it's sad why did I giggle?
Stop your making me blush. John 21:12KLOBBER wrote:I guess the same reason why any little girl giggles -- it's just what you do!2dimes wrote:Wait, if it's sad why did I giggle?
The above is all your belief, not mine. I rely on facts, not your foolish, crippled "logic" (if it can be called that).captain.crazy wrote:But you see, according to your own logic, you are the un evolving fool that still sits in a cave wondering why the sky fire goes out everyday and who lights it in the morning. Just show me to the link that refutes the language of dolphins and I will worship the sky fire with you... you stupid ass.
It's quite obvious in my newly founded religion. The "sky fire" is actually a hamburger that has been left on the grill too long by Ylliw Aknow, the god of food-making.KLOBBER wrote: When you say, "sky fire," what exactly do you mean by that?
KLOBBER wrote:The above is all your belief, not mine. I rely on facts, not your foolish, crippled "logic" (if it can be called that).captain.crazy wrote:But you see, according to your own logic, you are the un evolving fool that still sits in a cave wondering why the sky fire goes out everyday and who lights it in the morning. Just show me to the link that refutes the language of dolphins and I will worship the sky fire with you... you stupid ass.
What cave are you talking about? When you say, "sky fire," what exactly do you mean by that? Why do you want to worship your "sky fire?" Your post is exceedingly strange.
KLOBBER wrote:I have plenty, it's you who has none.
No u! No u!KLOBBER wrote:The above is all your belief, not mine. I rely on facts, not your foolish, crippled "logic" (if it can be called that).
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
You are really making no sense at all.captain.crazy wrote:I forgot... that great big bony cro-magnon brow of yours blocks the sun... you are oblivious to it....
Science doesn't require proof. Indeed the word "proof" really doesn't apply to science at all. Science looks at actual observations, which can be called "facts" and then tries to come up with the best explanation for those facts. Science is always ready to change it's explanations if new phenomenon are observed that contravene the current explanation. Science recognises that humans are far from perfect and it's entirely reasonable to expect that our current understanding of the world is not 100% accurate. This is in fairly stark contrast to the religious people who deny things like evolution (which is a fairly easily observed fact).Science requires proof. You have none.
of course not... at least not to you.KLOBBER wrote:You are really making no sense at all.captain.crazy wrote:I forgot... that great big bony cro-magnon brow of yours blocks the sun... you are oblivious to it....
You're not making any at all.captain.crazy wrote:of course not... at least not to you.KLOBBER wrote:You are really making no sense at all.captain.crazy wrote:I forgot... that great big bony cro-magnon brow of yours blocks the sun... you are oblivious to it....
Bacteria make major evolutionary shift in the labKLOBBER wrote:Evolution is not observed, and is not a fact.
Here are the actual facts: No person has ever observed any member or members of one species evolving from any member or members of another species. What is actually observed, every day, every week, every month, every year, every decade, every century, every millennium, is that members of each respective species produce members of their very own, exact same species, exclusively.
This is the way it has always been, this is the way it is in EVERY person's observation, and this is the way it will always be. Nobody has ever observed any divergence from this precise system, exactly as stated above. Darwinist "evolution" is nothing but a bluff with absolutely no evidence, and absolutely no observation backing it. It is a myth, plain and simple.
A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers' eyes. It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait.
You can say THAT again!owheelj wrote:...our current understanding of the world is not 100% accurate....
That article is pure BS, from a non-reputable source.captain.crazy wrote:Bacteria make major evolutionary shift in the labKLOBBER wrote:Evolution is not observed, and is not a fact.
Here are the actual facts: No person has ever observed any member or members of one species evolving from any member or members of another species. What is actually observed, every day, every week, every month, every year, every decade, every century, every millennium, is that members of each respective species produce members of their very own, exact same species, exclusively.
This is the way it has always been, this is the way it is in EVERY person's observation, and this is the way it will always be. Nobody has ever observed any divergence from this precise system, exactly as stated above. Darwinist "evolution" is nothing but a bluff with absolutely no evidence, and absolutely no observation backing it. It is a myth, plain and simple.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... e-lab.html
A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers' eyes. It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait.
PLAYER57832 wrote: Science requires proof. You have none.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
The same thing can be said of you.KLOBBER wrote:That article is pure BS, from a non-reputable source.captain.crazy wrote:Bacteria make major evolutionary shift in the labKLOBBER wrote:Evolution is not observed, and is not a fact.
Here are the actual facts: No person has ever observed any member or members of one species evolving from any member or members of another species. What is actually observed, every day, every week, every month, every year, every decade, every century, every millennium, is that members of each respective species produce members of their very own, exact same species, exclusively.
This is the way it has always been, this is the way it is in EVERY person's observation, and this is the way it will always be. Nobody has ever observed any divergence from this precise system, exactly as stated above. Darwinist "evolution" is nothing but a bluff with absolutely no evidence, and absolutely no observation backing it. It is a myth, plain and simple.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... e-lab.html
A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers' eyes. It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait.
ah: the intellectual Big Guns join in.JJM wrote:I say thst some atheists come up with absolutly ridicilous things such as the big bang. I mean seriously if they would just sit down and think maybe they could figure it out.
I do have to ask: in what conceivable universe that you inhabit is the New Scientist not a reliable source?KLOBBER wrote:That article is pure BS, from a non-reputable source.captain.crazy wrote:Bacteria make major evolutionary shift in the labKLOBBER wrote:Evolution is not observed, and is not a fact.
Here are the actual facts: No person has ever observed any member or members of one species evolving from any member or members of another species. What is actually observed, every day, every week, every month, every year, every decade, every century, every millennium, is that members of each respective species produce members of their very own, exact same species, exclusively.
This is the way it has always been, this is the way it is in EVERY person's observation, and this is the way it will always be. Nobody has ever observed any divergence from this precise system, exactly as stated above. Darwinist "evolution" is nothing but a bluff with absolutely no evidence, and absolutely no observation backing it. It is a myth, plain and simple.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... e-lab.html
A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers' eyes. It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait.
jonesthecurl wrote:ah: the intellectual Big Guns join in.JJM wrote:I say thst some atheists come up with absolutly ridicilous things such as the big bang. I mean seriously if they would just sit down and think maybe they could figure it out.

As long as there is not 100% absolute indisputable proof for every piece of the entire process, there will be a theory of Evolution. Even so, there is now so much supporting evidence that the chance Evolution, as a whole, is wrong is impossibly small. Most of the theory actually IS fact (mutations, natural selection, changes in species over time, species divergeance, geological stratification, etc. all are proven facts)jay_a2j wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote: Science requires proof. You have none.
HOLD ON A MINUTE!!!!!!
If science REQUIRES proof than the theory of evolution should have been thrown out long ago!
Because there is none.
If there was "proof" this issue would no longer be debated.
I think it's safe to say, where evolution is concerned, there is overwhelming "reasonable doubt".