Logic dictates that there is a God!

[jonesthecurl]

He has evolved the ability to excrete through his mouth.

[joecoolfrog]

I would imagine that having Klobber as an ally must be putting a huge strain on poor Jay

[KLOBBER]

Thank you for the insults, and thank you for showing that you are unable to address the issue. Your insults do not affect me.

[KLOBBER]

Thank you for that beautiful example of the ad hominem logical fallacy, and thank you for your failure to address the real issue, which all believers in evolution theory always fail to address.

Your defeat is thorough.

Your idiocy is thorough. I addressed the "real issue" when I sent you the link which refuted your assertion that speciation hadn't been observed. You, of course failed to look at it, which is why you failed to offer any sort of rebuttal, which is why you fail.

And BTW we've been through the ad hominem straw man theory ad nauseum in another thread. It still doesn't hold water. There's really no point in explaining it to you again since you wont listen, and even if you did you wouldn't understand. It would be like giving lobster to a starving man. Too rich, you'd only wind up sitting on the toilet for a half hour longer than usual.

I never stated that "speciation" hadn't been observed, and you also never cited any observation of one species producing a member of another. Thank you for failing to address the issue, and for displaying your class -level (or lack thereof) so clearly. Anger management issues much?

[KLOBBER]

The atheist, because his own childish theories hold no merit of their own on which to stand, and because the absolute truth of the Supreme Lord cannot be challenged by any honest means, all too often mentions such bizarre red herrings as "spaghetti monster," "mermaids," "sky faeries," and a myriad of other ridiculous straw-man arguments that he manufactures in his fertile imagination. The straw-man argument is perhaps the most shameful and childish of all of the logical fallacies, and is among the atheist’s very favorites.

The fact is that the ungodly atheist is afraid to face the issue directly: that God's personal and intelligent plan makes much more sense as the ultimate origin of the highly structured, ordered, and variegated universe that we all experience every day than such silly, mythological concepts as "chance," "randomness," and "evolution theory." The atheist’s fear stems from the fact that he knows, deep down inside, that he is wrong.

It is physically, logically, and mathematically impossible to derive life from nonliving chemicals, personality from some imaginary, impersonal system of “chance,” or any amount of greater intelligence from any amount of lesser intelligence. The conclusion is that all life comes from life, all personality comes from personality, and all relative intelligence comes from absolute intelligence.

There is not so much as one single example, in the experience of any scientist throughout all time, of one species being observed producing a member of another species. Conversely, every nanosecond, every millisecond, every instant, every moment, every second, every minute, every hour, every day, every week, every month, every year, every decade, every lifetime, every generation, every century, every millennium, every epoch, every aeon, every era, and every age, since time immemorial, and right down the line, to this very red-hot nanosecond, what we observe, each and every time, without fail, adjustment, or substitution, is that each respective species produces members of its very own, very same species. There is absolutely not so much as a single example, throughout the entire history of all time, of crossover from one species to any other species -- none at all.

Since scientific method is based, first and foremost, upon observation, and the very lynchpin of “evolution theory,” (species crossover), has never been observed by any individual, ever, throughout all time, the only rational conclusion is that evolution theory is a 100% unscientific opinion.

Only the insane can neglect these hard facts and insist upon the foolish, illogical, and premature convolutions of "evolution theory" instead.

[Timminz]

Delusional people are entertaining.

Also, 13 posts in a row! Impressive!

If only quantity actually made up for lack of quality.

[Neoteny]

lolz

[StiffMittens]

I never stated that "speciation" hadn't been observed, and you also never cited any observation of one species producing a member of another. Thank you for failing to address the issue, and for displaying your class -level (or lack thereof) so clearly. Anger management issues much?

Yes, you did, only you inaccurately referred to it as "species divergence". And did I cite such an observation. It was in the link that I included with my post which you obviously failed to follow and read the article.

And what makes you think I'm angry? I'm just having fun describing your profound inanity and astounding stupidity.

[StiffMittens]

The straw-man argument is perhaps the most shameful and childish of all of the logical fallacies...

which is no doubt why you use it so frequently.

There is not so much as one single example, in the experience of any scientist throughout all time, of one species being observed producing a member of another species.Conversely, every nanosecond, every millisecond, every instant, every moment, every second, every minute, every hour, every day, every week, every month, every year, every decade, every lifetime, every generation, every century, every millennium, every epoch, every aeon, every era, and every age, since time immemorial, and right down the line, to this very red-hot nanosecond, what we observe, each and every time, without fail, adjustment, or substitution, is that each respective species produces members of its very own, very same species. There is absolutely not so much as a single example, throughout the entire history of all time, of crossover from one species to any other species -- none at all.

Wrong again. Follow the link from my earlier post and READ about several examples.

Since scientific method is based, first and foremost, upon observation, and the very lynchpin of “evolution theory,” (species crossover), has never been observed by any individual, ever, throughout all time, the only rational conclusion is that evolution theory is a 100% unscientific opinion.

Repeating it over and over again is not going to make it any less wrong.

[obliterationX]

lolz

lmfa0

[KLOBBER]

Wrong again. Follow the link from my earlier post and READ about several examples.

There are no valid examples in that link.

[KLOBBER]

I never stated that "speciation" hadn't been observed, and you also never cited any observation of one species producing a member of another. Thank you for failing to address the issue, and for displaying your class -level (or lack thereof) so clearly. Anger management issues much?

Yes, you did, only you inaccurately referred to it as "species divergence". And did I cite such an observation. It was in the link that I included with my post which you obviously failed to follow and read the article.

And what makes you think I'm angry? I'm just having fun describing your profound inanity and astounding stupidity.

Wrong again. "Species divergence" was a term someone else brought up, not me. You did not cite any such observation; you cited something else altogether. You are indeed a very angry little person.

[jonesthecurl]

I'm reverting to my former policy. clip-clop, clip-clop.

[KLOBBER]

No species has ever been observed producing a amember of another species. The silly link that Stiffkittens posted leads to a website with a few made-up lies, but no references to any actual observation of such a phenomenon. If there had ever been such an occurrence in real-life, it would be all over the news and on the front page of every newspaper on the planet.

Nice try, but lies do not qualify as real science, no matter how easy it is to post a link to those lies. Now that that's settled, feel free to return to your little temper-tantrum, during which you repeatedly attempt to belittle me by displaying your low class and anger management issues, but fail miserably, rather than addressing the real issues with anything but lies.

[jonesthecurl]

clip-clop

[Neoteny]

I'm reverting to my former policy. clip-clop, clip-clop.

Quoting for great justice.

[KLOBBER]

Clip-clop, she says! A girl who dreams about horses....

http://www.clipclopclub.com/

[jonesthecurl]

The goat who post next would be much more tasty.

[StiffMittens]

go and get fatter on the mountain and I'll eat you on your way back.

[MeDeFe]

Hey, just do it like I do, ignore klobber's posts. He has shown that he is incapable of debate, so why bother?

[KLOBBER]

Hey, just do it like I do, ignore klobber's posts. He has shown that he is incapable of debate, so why bother?

That is what most people who know they're wrong eventually do in the face of the truth.

[JoshyBoy]

Well its nice to see that the majority of people who have voted have chosen the right answer.

That would be the first option.

[Neoteny]

It's refreshing to note that a quarter of our forum-goers are not deluded.

[Juan_Bottom]

Well its nice to see that the majority of people who have voted have chosen the right answer.

That would be the first option.

I would love to see the "teacher's guide" as to how that is the correct answer. I would buy that book.

[JoshyBoy]

It's refreshing to note that a quarter of our forum-goers are not deluded.

It's quite amusing having discussions about topics like these with people whose IQ's don't even make it into double figures.