Zimmerman vs. DMX - Boxing Match?

[TheGeneral2112]

Jesus, you are all incredibly misinformed. Have any of you read the police report? Do any of you understand the law when it comes to a clean shoot? Read the police report before you mouth off with your fucking opinion. This ****** was bashing Zimmerman's head against the curb when he drew his firearm with this punk ass on top of him, then shot. A witness didn't see the shot, but he saw Zimmerman on the bottom getting the shit beat out of him and ran upstairs to call the cops. The shot happened when the witness wasn't looking. Until you have read the police report and have heard from the FUCKING WITNESSES (THERE WERE THREE) THEN SHUT THE f*ck UP!

Wow, now given that you've provided no sources to back up your claims, and that even a casual search of google indicate that you're misinformed, what are you trying to say?

OMG GUYS GOOGLE SAYS I'M WRONG!! I'VE QUOTED NO SOURCES!! EXCEPT THE FUCKING POLICE REPORT!!!

Can I ask you where you're getting your information from when you say

This ****** was bashing Zimmerman's head against the curb when he drew his firearm with this punk ass on top of him, then shot.

I'd hate to be misinformed.

Again with this shit? Don't you listen?

And for all asking about height/weight, here you go.





And for all of you who wonder why the video doesn't show injuries, here you go.



For anyone wondering about what happened when the cops showed up, here you go.



For anyone that still thinks Trayvon is innocent, reread that last sentence written by Officer Timothy Smith.

[saxitoxin]

Some people do not like it because it does not paint Trayvon as innocent.

What specific elements of the photos paint him as guilty, do you feel?

I don't feel that a photograph makes someone guilty. These new photos are not as innocent looking as the ones the media used

When the media report on someone should they (a) show every photograph that was ever taken of that person in that person's entire life?, (b) show photographs that are representative of the general tone of photographs taken of that person?, (c) show photographs that only cast the person in a positive light?, (d) show photographs that only cast that person in a negative light?

I think "B." I assume, without delving deep into the subject, that self-pics Martin posted where he was mugging for his friends probably constituted a very tiny percentage of all the photos taken of him in his entire life.

[Night Strike]

Some people do not like it because it does not paint Trayvon as innocent.

What specific elements of the photos paint him as guilty, do you feel?

I don't feel that a photograph makes someone guilty. These new photos are not as innocent looking as the ones the media used

When the media report on someone should they (a) show every photograph that was ever taken of that person in that person's entire life?, (b) show photographs that are representative of the general tone of photographs taken of that person?, (c) show photographs that only cast the person in a positive light?, (d) show photographs that only cast that person in a negative light?

I think "B." I assume, without delving deep into the subject, that self-pics Martin posted where he was mugging for his friends probably constituted a very tiny percentage of all the photos taken of him in his entire life.

I just ask that they post a recent picture. They posted a very young-looking picture of Martin and a semi-angry, almost-mug-shot picture of Zimmerman. Pictures can tell the story that the media wants to hint at.

[Phatscotty]

Someone else tried the same tactic here
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3669968

[natty dread]

"Enhanced video" = "video we photoshopped to look like Zimmerman is wounded, because we're racists"

[Night Strike]

"Enhanced video" = "video we photoshopped to look like Zimmerman is wounded, because we're racists"

For living across the pond, some of you really like to inject yourself into conversations about what's going on in the US. And what's worse is when you do so posting drivel like the above quote. This is ABC we're talking about....they're the ones that first aired the regular video and tried to use it as proof that there were no injuries. Furthermore, it would take a lot of work to fake an entire video segment and not just one little picture like the one Phatscotty posted.

[BigBallinStalin]

"Enhanced video" = "video we photoshopped to look like Zimmerman is wounded, because we're racists"

(assuming the above is true; it was originally posted by the General on the previous page)

So the officer lied on his report? How do you know?

[Baron Von PWN]

Again with this shit? Don't you listen?

And for all asking about height/weight, here you go.





And for all of you who wonder why the video doesn't show injuries, here you go.



For anyone wondering about what happened when the cops showed up, here you go.



For anyone that still thinks Trayvon is innocent, reread that last sentence written by Officer Timothy Smith.

All it shows is that they got in a fight. We have nothing but Zimmerman's word that Martin started it. Though it's interesting the police list 160 for martin. I had heard 140. Police just estimate weight right?

[Lootifer]

No handgun = no dead dude? /shrug

[Phatscotty]

No handgun = no dead dude? /shrug

You seem to suggest that a handgun is the only way someone can be killed?



Aren't you forgetting about the skittles?

[Army of GOD]

Just ONCE I want a typical leftist to agree with the rights or a typical rightist to agree with the lefts.

I feel like all of you guys are mentally incapable of seeing arguments from different points of view.


also, this is my take on it: none of us were there. We can only imagine what the f*ck really happened between the Zimmerman telegram and Steve Martin. I'm not going to sit here and pretend like I know one was in the wrong, because I wasn't fucking there. Yes, the US has a massive race problem (both whites and blacks are at fault), but it's perpetuated when we have idiots who go back and forth continuously (enter New Black Panthers, Spike Lee being an idiot, etc.).

[BigBallinStalin]

Just ONCE I want a typical leftist to agree with the rights or a typical rightist to agree with the lefts.

I feel like all of you guys are mentally incapable of seeing arguments from different points of view.


also, this is my take on it: none of us were there. We can only imagine what the f*ck really happened between the Zimmerman telegram and Steve Martin. I'm not going to sit here and pretend like I know one was in the wrong, because I wasn't fucking there. Yes, the US has a massive race problem (both whites and blacks are at fault), but it's perpetuated when we have idiots who go back and forth continuously (enter New Black Panthers, Spike Lee being an idiot, etc.).

NO! NO! Steve Martin was killed? WHEN!?! WHENNN!!?

[Army of GOD]

Just ONCE I want a typical leftist to agree with the rights or a typical rightist to agree with the lefts.

I feel like all of you guys are mentally incapable of seeing arguments from different points of view.


also, this is my take on it: none of us were there. We can only imagine what the f*ck really happened between the Zimmerman telegram and Steve Martin. I'm not going to sit here and pretend like I know one was in the wrong, because I wasn't fucking there. Yes, the US has a massive race problem (both whites and blacks are at fault), but it's perpetuated when we have idiots who go back and forth continuously (enter New Black Panthers, Spike Lee being an idiot, etc.).

NO! NO! Steve Martin was killed? WHEN!?! WHENNN!!?

After Sgt. Bilko, which was the second of two films he was in that were any good.

[natty dread]

"Enhanced video" = "video we photoshopped to look like Zimmerman is wounded, because we're racists"

For living across the pond, some of you really like to inject yourself into conversations about what's going on in the US. And what's worse is when you do so posting drivel like the above quote. This is ABC we're talking about....they're the ones that first aired the regular video and tried to use it as proof that there were no injuries. Furthermore, it would take a lot of work to fake an entire video segment and not just one little picture like the one Phatscotty posted.

Pffthaha.

You can not "enhance" a video, that's bullshit. A video contains a certain amount of data. There's no way to somehow make it contain more data, by doing some weird "enhance" thing that just sort of magically makes it better. It's fixed resolution. You zoom in, all you see is huge pixels.

The "enhanced" video just looks like someone airbrushed a red blot on zimmerman's head in each frame. It's so obviously fake it's not even funny.

[saxitoxin]

Some people do not like it because it does not paint Trayvon as innocent.

What specific elements of the photos paint him as guilty, do you feel?

I don't feel that a photograph makes someone guilty. These new photos are not as innocent looking as the ones the media used

When the media report on someone should they (a) show every photograph that was ever taken of that person in that person's entire life?, (b) show photographs that are representative of the general tone of photographs taken of that person?, (c) show photographs that only cast the person in a positive light?, (d) show photographs that only cast that person in a negative light?

I think "B." I assume, without delving deep into the subject, that self-pics Martin posted where he was mugging for his friends probably constituted a very tiny percentage of all the photos taken of him in his entire life.

I just ask that they post a recent picture. They posted a very young-looking picture of Martin and a semi-angry, almost-mug-shot picture of Zimmerman. Pictures can tell the story that the media wants to hint at.

I can't think of a single other time in recent memory when the MSM has posted a photo of someone flipping off the camera. Unless you can, you're essentially asking they adopt a more critical standard of photo selection just for Treyvon Martin.

[saxitoxin]

"Enhanced video" = "video we photoshopped to look like Zimmerman is wounded, because we're racists"

For living across the pond, some of you really like to inject yourself into conversations about what's going on in the US. And what's worse is when you do so posting drivel like the above quote. This is ABC we're talking about....they're the ones that first aired the regular video and tried to use it as proof that there were no injuries. Furthermore, it would take a lot of work to fake an entire video segment and not just one little picture like the one Phatscotty posted.

Pffthaha.

You can not "enhance" a video, that's bullshit. A video contains a certain amount of data. There's no way to somehow make it contain more data, by doing some weird "enhance" thing that just sort of magically makes it better. It's fixed resolution. You zoom in, all you see is huge pixels.

The "enhanced" video just looks like someone airbrushed a red blot on zimmerman's head in each frame. It's so obviously fake it's not even funny.

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic but are terms that won't be understood by the general public, whereas "enhance" is a more commonly understood word.

There's all sorts of room for media bias but to suggest the oldest broadcaster on the planet Earth is amateurishly airbrushing in red spots kind of leaves you sharing a straight-jacket with people who claim ...

[oVo]

Again with this shit? Don't you listen?

Does the Police report or any of the "witnesses" know who started it?

For anyone wondering about what happened when the cops showed up, here you go.

Everyone has read what happened when the cops showed up, what isn't known is what happened before the cops showed up.

[natty dread]

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic

Indeed they aren't.

De-noising isn't an exact science, it's based on frequency analysis - basically just smoothing out certain frequencies of the image... it doesn't make wounds magically appear where none were visible before.

The "wound" is obviously photoshopped. It doesn't even look real.

[Borderdawg]

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic

Indeed they aren't.

De-noising isn't an exact science, it's based on frequency analysis - basically just smoothing out certain frequencies of the image... it doesn't make wounds magically appear where none were visible before.

The "wound" is obviously photoshopped. It doesn't even look real.

....who knew PLAYER57832 had a bastard kid in Finland.......

[thegreekdog]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/abc-new-enhanced-video-seems-to-show-injuries-on-zimmermans-head/

ABC released new, “enhanced” video on Monday that appears to show injuries on George Zimmerman’s head, possibly adding to his defense that he was attacked before shooting Trayvon Martin.

Careful dude, you're posting about the Trayvon Martin thing, TGD will explain why you shouldn't post.

Yeah, he shouldn't post either.

[natty dread]

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic

Indeed they aren't.

De-noising isn't an exact science, it's based on frequency analysis - basically just smoothing out certain frequencies of the image... it doesn't make wounds magically appear where none were visible before.

The "wound" is obviously photoshopped. It doesn't even look real.

....who knew PLAYER57832 had a bastard kid in Finland.......

She does? Nice.

I suppose you're the father then? I can't imagine how else you'd know about her progeny...

[saxitoxin]

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic

Indeed they aren't.

De-noising isn't an exact science, it's based on frequency analysis - basically just smoothing out certain frequencies of the image... it doesn't make wounds magically appear where none were visible before.

The "wound" is obviously photoshopped. It doesn't even look real.

LOL, I don't even know where to go with this.

[Nola_Lifer]

I can't believe yall are supporting a person who killed a man unless there was evidence that the other had a weapon. So far, there was no report about Martin having a weapon, yet Zimmerman did have a gun. Who was acting in self-defense first? Martin? Guess we won't get his half of the story seeing he was killed.

The Stand Your Ground law includes NO requirement that the other person must have a weapon for you to stand your ground. Furthermore, a person could fight well enough to incapacitate the person who does have a weapon and then use that weapon to kill them, so a lack of a weapon does not automatically indicate innocence.

Look at how skinny Martin is compared to Zimmerman. You gonna tell me that that young man would be able to take on Zimmerman and beat him to death without help from others. This kid isn't a trained fighter.

[Borderdawg]

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic

Indeed they aren't.

De-noising isn't an exact science, it's based on frequency analysis - basically just smoothing out certain frequencies of the image... it doesn't make wounds magically appear where none were visible before.

The "wound" is obviously photoshopped. It doesn't even look real.

....who knew PLAYER57832 had a bastard kid in Finland.......

She does? Nice.

I suppose you're the father then? I can't imagine how else you'd know about her progeny...

........well, I've been with some real skanky bitches in my day, and you're what, 28, 29? So it is quite possible you could be one of my demon spawn..........

[natty dread]

It looks like they just increased the brightness and lowered the noise, neither of which is magic

Indeed they aren't.

De-noising isn't an exact science, it's based on frequency analysis - basically just smoothing out certain frequencies of the image... it doesn't make wounds magically appear where none were visible before.

The "wound" is obviously photoshopped. It doesn't even look real.

....who knew PLAYER57832 had a bastard kid in Finland.......

She does? Nice.

I suppose you're the father then? I can't imagine how else you'd know about her progeny...

........well, I've been with some real skanky bitches in my day, and you're what, 28, 29? So it is quite possible you could be one of my demon spawn..........

Who, me? Nah. I'm too good looking to be related to you.