It's funny how things change and images in the media influence what is visually appealing. I remember back in the nineties, just before tattoos went mainstream. Women would very rarely have a single tattoo unless they ran with a motorcycle club. It seemed gross usually. Now done well even a sleeve seems normal.
Agreed tailgunner but she has that look he's talking about. She could be the worst most dangerous woman in the world but she sure looks like a sweet innocent girl. I find that really attractive too. It's one of my stupidest ideas that I can't let go.
I want so badly to believe she wouldn't at some point make me want to drive my car into a wall!
Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.
ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.
+1
“Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.” ― Voltaire
I respect that opinion but I don't agree anymore. While I wouldn't encourage anyone to get them. I can appreceate them. Like any art they are subjective and I like some better than others. These two women are equall in beauty and my favorite of the batch. If the tattoos where reversed they would not affect it for me. They have just become normal like jewelry that can't be changed.
ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.
Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?
ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.
ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.
Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?
Of course! Where have you been the last.............100 000 years?
AoG for President of the World!! I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.
Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?
Of course! Where have you been the last.............100 000 years?
sorry yentlemen no not how to embed the link. Go here and have something soft to catch your jaw ready to go. The one with dark hair is my number one, prior to this th etitle was held by jessica biel for a solid 7 or 8 years