Iliad wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Understand that the barbarians are at the gate.
I was waiting for you to disregard a complex issue completely and reduce it to a cliche.
Never mind the socio-economic reasons behind the hatred of the youth, the reason that they feel disenfranchised enough to start looting and rioting given the opportunity. Never mind that the high unemployment, austerity measures, the education sector, the closing down of youth centers that have led to the youth having no investment what so ever in the status quo. Never mind the interesting reflection of the consumerist culture, that spends billions on convincing the population that its objects are invaluable and now it appears is more than successful. Never mind the police's response, the mindset of whom has led to a murder of 29 year old father of four, whose response has been completely unable to stem the youth. Never mind what this could mean for possible cuts for the police or whether their response has been shaped to highlight to the government that they are invaluable.
The riots and looting are reprehensible but to simply shut off your brain, which does seem to be your default status, and to call them barbarians misses a great deal what these riots have revealed.
Some things are apparent here, based on Pedro's descriptions (and I would hardly call Pedro a conservative, pro-elite, pro-status quo kind of guy):
(1) The original riots started as a response to the police shooting a man.
(2) The riots are now the avenue by which youths have taken advantage, criminally.
So, I ask you the following questions:
(1) Who among the rioters are disenfranchised?
(2) What makes you think that the reason for the riots is disenfranchisement and not, as Pedro suggests, trying to steal stuff?
(3) What makes you think the riots are a response to high unemployment and austerity measures?
I additionally offer the following - If these young men were rioting to change the system, I would have sympathy for them. Instead, they are rioting (can we even call it rioting) because they want free shit. Therefore, although Phatscotty is quick with the one liners that don't make sense, it's ridiculous for you to posit that these riots are anything more than a way for people to steal things. I mean, really... disenfranchisement? Are you suggesting there is some sort of comparison between these people and the people in Egypt or Libya? Knock it off.