[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
TheForgivenOne wrote:Albiestar had made numerous eTickets since he originally got his 6 month Website ban back in September. The ban was lifted, and we gave him another chance. But it appeared he went back to his old ways, so he was given an Indefinite Website Ban.
Is there a reason this "Indefinite" ban only lasted 9 months?
TheForgivenOne wrote:Albiestar had made numerous eTickets since he originally got his 6 month Website ban back in September. The ban was lifted, and we gave him another chance. But it appeared he went back to his old ways, so he was given an Indefinite Website Ban.
Is there a reason this "Indefinite" ban only lasted 9 months?
He's premium, that's the reason. It's possible to pay your way out of verdicts. Just like the real world then lol.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
hey i opened up a suggestion, having albiestar foed by default for all members, and only those who agreeto play him use the option to unfoe him. it's been rejected in hours!! lol
betiko wrote:hey i opened up a suggestion, having albiestar foed by default for all members, and only those who agreeto play him use the option to unfoe him. it's been rejected in hours!! lol
lol
but a good sug would be if possible to make it that you must of mad a certain rank before being allowed to play team games. or for players like this banning them from team games if that is possible.
agentcom wrote:Edit: I just noticed this was in closed ... I assume the "Website Ban" in the title means that you all have made your decision then. Good choice.
He was given an "Indefinite" Website Ban a year ago. However, he has been back since October.
I would like an official statement of explanation to be issued as to why this ban was overturned. (Preferably this would include a copy of all discussion between the user and the admin relating to this ban, however I know that they will never release that...)
agentcom wrote:Edit: I just noticed this was in closed ... I assume the "Website Ban" in the title means that you all have made your decision then. Good choice.
He was given an "Indefinite" Website Ban a year ago. However, he has been back since October.
I would like an official statement of explanation to be issued as to why this ban was overturned. (Preferably this would include a copy of all discussion between the user and the admin relating to this ban, however I know that they will never release that...)
You're damn right they won't lol.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
Now only around 200 games to be ruined by the inevitable deadbeating.
It would be much nicer if the C and A decissions on players like this were respected by admin. Would probably save C and A getting abuse from people.....
2 games from his begining time back up to you lot to carry on looking
Edit: I just noticed this was in closed ... I assume the "Website Ban" in the title means that you all have made your decision then. Good choice.
the suggestion I made that you took as a flame to albiestar was actually do to this. It was a player website banned that alomst 100% of the community that played him foed. Since someone decided to remove the ban and letting him back because of a 25$ bribe, I thought it was better to have him foed by default and do a favour to anyone who didn't have him foed yet and could see him join a game. Hell, I've seen profiles where it is stated "foe albiestar, trust me on that".
2 games from his begining time back up to you lot to carry on looking
Edit: I just noticed this was in closed ... I assume the "Website Ban" in the title means that you all have made your decision then. Good choice.
the suggestion I made that you took as a flame to albiestar was actually do to this. It was a player website banned that alomst 100% of the community that played him foed. Since someone decided to remove the ban and letting him back because of a 25$ bribe, I thought it was better to have him foed by default and do a favour to anyone who didn't have him foed yet and could see him join a game. Hell, I've seen profiles where it is stated "foe albiestar, trust me on that".
OK, yeah, forget the "Edit" part of my post. I didn't realize that this was the old thread. Then my first point remains, which was that eddie2 had already pointed out intentional losing before BG asked for evidence.
And yes, this player should be permabanned IMO (and if anyone asks my opinion on the matter, that will be my stance as a moderator, as well). I've got personal experience with this player as my "teammate." He is either profoundly terrible at this game or intentionally annoying. It would boggle the mind that someone could be that bad, so my guess is intentionally annoying. Either way, he doesn't belong here.
2 games from his begining time back up to you lot to carry on looking
Edit: I just noticed this was in closed ... I assume the "Website Ban" in the title means that you all have made your decision then. Good choice.
the suggestion I made that you took as a flame to albiestar was actually do to this. It was a player website banned that alomst 100% of the community that played him foed. Since someone decided to remove the ban and letting him back because of a 25$ bribe, I thought it was better to have him foed by default and do a favour to anyone who didn't have him foed yet and could see him join a game. Hell, I've seen profiles where it is stated "foe albiestar, trust me on that".
He probably had to pay 25$ just to get back to the site as a freemium, so a 50$ bribe is what I would guess, still a cheap thing to do by the site, and sends the wrong message.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
You guys necro bumped a thread that was a year old. An indefinite website ban is different from a permanent ban.
If you see him missing turns or losing games on purpose, feel free to make a new report. If not, and you just want to make a mob out of this, find something else to do.
The last time I checked he was only around 600++points when someone bumped this one yr old case and now he is currently 724. I think he is trying.
This old report is going to be locked. If you have a case, open a new report with supporting evidence.