Maybe the kid is saying 'whore'.Symmetry wrote:are we talking about the guy with the kid pic labeled "whore" in his sig?
Moderator: Community Team
Maybe the kid is saying 'whore'.Symmetry wrote:are we talking about the guy with the kid pic labeled "whore" in his sig?
Never said that,the biggest problem with all religions is the adherents.mrswdk wrote:Exactly. It is a savage religion.chang50 wrote:No,Muslims have their sectarian divides also and they've been killing and persecuting each other almost from the get go..mrswdk wrote:So there we go. Christians are indeed being slaughtered wholesale, and there is your study which proves it.
Ever noticed how it's always Christians and Jews being persecuted? The only two civilised religions in a sea of savagery.
As I delve further into the question, you leave me with no answers. How can I respond to a question to which you provide no further information??Symmetry wrote:I'm still unclear about what you would call it, so, having given an answer to the poster who was banned for calling for my death, I think you might owe me an answer to my question.BigBallinStalin wrote:So google's publishing this, or ConquerClub is publishing this? You're being very vague, so I'd appreciate some clarity.Symmetry wrote:You are aware that the threads on this site are published on google, right? Anyone can view the stuff that CC puts out within the forums. I'd call that publishing.BigBallinStalin wrote:What's ConquerClub publishing?
What would you call it?
lolSymmetry wrote:Meh, you'll hardly notice it, man up dude.mrswdk wrote:So Muslims will only try to kill you a little bit?
Well, as Tertullian said, "The blood of the saints is the seed of the church."/ wrote:That's not very good advertisement for the church.
You'll be saved forever!*
*Except for your body, 100,000 of you are going to be murdered this year.
Eighty people have been executed by firing squad in North Korea for watching foreign films, according to a newspaper report.
South Korea’s JoongAng Ilbo newspaper reported that the co-ordinated public executions took place in seven separate cities earlier this month.
In one case, the local authorities rounded up 10,000 people, including children, and forced them to watch, it reported.
Those put to death were found guilty by the state of minor misdemeanors, including watching videos of South Korean television programs or possessing a Bible.
Sources told the paper that witnesses saw eight people tied to stakes in the Shinpoong Stadium, in Kangwon Province, before having sacks placed over their heads and being executed by soldiers firing machineguns....


That's the problem with every religion. Just because people are jerks does not make the original idea wrong.chang50 wrote:The religion itself is peaceful,as are most.The problem is the adherents,look at Tibet before Communism,or the Sri lankan civil war,or the persecution and murder of Muslims in Myanmar currently ongoing by Buddhists,including monks.2dimes wrote:I like several religions. Buddhism is typically very gentle. Often to the point of being vegetarian and caring for insects. Savagery?
I've been in Thailand long enough to see Buddhists are not especially gentle people,and this is a Western stereotype looking through rose-tinted glasses.
I can't provide any further information about what you would call it. That answer is yours. Perhaps I could ask a simpler question, and pose it "Why don't you think it's publishing?"BigBallinStalin wrote:As I delve further into the question, you leave me with no answers. How can I respond to a question to which you provide no further information??Symmetry wrote:I'm still unclear about what you would call it, so, having given an answer to the poster who was banned for calling for my death, I think you might owe me an answer to my question.BigBallinStalin wrote:So google's publishing this, or ConquerClub is publishing this? You're being very vague, so I'd appreciate some clarity.Symmetry wrote:You are aware that the threads on this site are published on google, right? Anyone can view the stuff that CC puts out within the forums. I'd call that publishing.BigBallinStalin wrote:What's ConquerClub publishing?
What would you call it?
Anyone agreeing with you would also be mistaken,mrswdk wrote:I pointed out that Christianity and Judaism are the only civilized religions.
Or to use a more realistic example, when the U.S. announced that there was a holy war against non-Christians, would that count?mrswdk wrote:Did they cite their following of you as their reason for killing all those people? Did they target those people specifically because those people aren't followers of you?
If you must use analogies then try not to over-simplify in the process.
Are you avoiding the question?mrswdk wrote:Name another religion whose adherents know how to behave themselves in a civilized manner.
You go first, if you can think of any.mrswdk wrote:Name another religion whose adherents know how to behave themselves in a civilized manner.
Wait, you don't think that the President of the US announced that the "War on Terror" was a "Crusade"?mrswdk wrote:I was responding to oVo.
The American government has announced no such thing.
You've overlooked the Subject Line of this thread and the source of those fatalities.mrswdk wrote:Christians and Jews.
All the others are engaged in slaughter to at least some extent.
Christians are being killed because of their faith. Christians are not killing others because of their faith. I stand by my statement.oVo wrote:You've overlooked the Subject Line of this thread and the source of those fatalities.mrswdk wrote:Christians and Jews.
All the others are engaged in slaughter to at least some extent.
Online dictionaries are very rarely your friend. When you declare that your war is a crusade, it's religious.mrswdk wrote:'Crusade' does not mean 'holy war'. Online dictionaries are your friend.
Perhaps you could look to other Crusades for examples, there were a few of them.thegreekdog wrote:Is a war a crusade for both sides when one side declares it a religious war? Maybe President Bush should have called it an anti-crusade or something.
Does anyone know some characteristics of a crusade? Does it involve rebuilding the country you invaded? Does it involve training the military forces of the country you invaded?
Does calling a war a crusade, alone, make it a crusade? I think that's what you're saying.Symmetry wrote:Perhaps you could look to other Crusades for examples, there were a few of them.thegreekdog wrote:Is a war a crusade for both sides when one side declares it a religious war? Maybe President Bush should have called it an anti-crusade or something.
Does anyone know some characteristics of a crusade? Does it involve rebuilding the country you invaded? Does it involve training the military forces of the country you invaded?
If the leader of a nation, when declaring war makes a national speech saying that it's a crusade, I would say that's strong evidence in favour.thegreekdog wrote:Does calling a war a crusade, alone, make it a crusade? I think that's what you're saying.Symmetry wrote:Perhaps you could look to other Crusades for examples, there were a few of them.thegreekdog wrote:Is a war a crusade for both sides when one side declares it a religious war? Maybe President Bush should have called it an anti-crusade or something.
Does anyone know some characteristics of a crusade? Does it involve rebuilding the country you invaded? Does it involve training the military forces of the country you invaded?