black elk speaks wrote:PopeBenXVI wrote:
I'm not sure what you are talking about. I never claimed I was there? I did however listen intently to a couple christian radio stations often during that time and her family were on a couple explaining the case so I am quite familiar with it. She was not unconcious until after they started starving her to death. I sence a lack of compassion for life on this forum. Just because she did not contribute to the GDP does not mean she was not alive and aware.
Sorry pope. My comments were directed towards boori. He, being for the Netherlands or wherever seems to be so in tuned with the Schivo case that he was so inclined to inform you of how wrong your understanding of the situation is.
Actually, I've followed the case about as much as anyone else could've who wasn't actually part of the case.
And yes, his understanding of the case is completely wrong. Simply because Terri Schiavo wasn't concious. Her condition, according to both the doctors her family selected and the ones her husband selected, and according to the one the court selected, meant that she was completely unaware of things. This is a medical fact.
She was alive, but not aware. Her brain was turned to liquid.
I generally tend to think that the family should have some say in what it best for their daughter and the fact that her "husband" had a million dollar life insurance policy and the say so regarding the termination of her life comes to me as highly suspect.
Hell, best for her daughter would've been exactly what has happened. There was absolutely no chance of recovering.