Moderator: Community Team
I agree. Who did you see saying those things that you felt came off as "preparing for a mislynch"?Loose Canon wrote:Swang is an easy I would go as far as saying lazy candidate for lynching.
But what roused my suspicions was the players posting early on that they couldn't see any other outcome D2 than a Swang lynch.
It was sort of preparing the groundwork for a mislynch on Swang - I thought.
I take the point that Swang perhaps hasn't done a lot townie.
I think a vote on Swang is just like sticking a pin to select a horse to bet on.
And I think there are scum feels on other players so we can and should try to do better than pinsticking.
How will we be able to work with it? What will you deduce from a lynch if swang flips either scum or town?Charle wrote:Whatever Swang will turn out to be, Scum or Town, it is going to be an interesting result and I have a feeling we might be able to work with that.
Would you explain why you think he "smells scummy"?Kingm wrote:Vote Swang
After reading over things another time, I still feel a bit lost, but I agree that Swang smells scummy.
Hoping we will get more info from D2 lynch and N2 nightactions.

Its the above "I dont see too many scenarios where this day doesn't end with a Swang lynch" that I think is suspect and suggestivestrike wolf wrote:It's been a busy week and I'm admittedly feeling a bit mentally exhausted by it. So this is just going to be a summary
I need to relook at Ragian in particular. He didnt catch my attention D1 and have found myself not fully following the accusations or defense well. PMC still seems odd to me but based on a Dev (I think?) comment, I think I need to relook into specifics. I do think Kong is skating a bit when I do feel like there was some play day 1 that was at the least odd if not suspect. Ultimately though, I don't see many scenarios where this day doesn't end with a Swang lynch since most of these suspicions arise from the way the lynch was shifted away from him yesterday.
I'm finding I don't really have many strong town reads. I still think LC is town and I lean slightly town on Charle but Id mark the rest as neutral to scummy.
Charle, I've re-read your posts since I posted a short while ago that PMC had convinced me to add you as the 4th member of my scum list.Charle wrote:You fell off the bus completely this time bud, I am 100% town.pmchugh wrote:I honestly feel charle is a much better target than either of the voted players. Nothing has changed my mind. When we were scum together he would make a little plan of who he was going to accuse in scum chat and then go act on it the next day. Last game as town he did not do that. I am his target this game.
I guess with less than two days to the deadline I may have to change based on the vote counts, but will wait a bit to see if anyone sees what I do.
Decent stuff. But what I don't get about the Swang suspicion is that if scum - as several people have suggested - indeed steered the lynch away from swang and onto DDS, how does that necessarily incriminate swang? Any experienced scum would make sure that they picked a townie as a fall guy D2. And here we are.Loose Canon wrote:Its the above "I dont see too many scenarios where this day doesn't end with a Swang lynch" that I think is suspect and suggestivestrike wolf wrote:It's been a busy week and I'm admittedly feeling a bit mentally exhausted by it. So this is just going to be a summary
I need to relook at Ragian in particular. He didnt catch my attention D1 and have found myself not fully following the accusations or defense well. PMC still seems odd to me but based on a Dev (I think?) comment, I think I need to relook into specifics. I do think Kong is skating a bit when I do feel like there was some play day 1 that was at the least odd if not suspect. Ultimately though, I don't see many scenarios where this day doesn't end with a Swang lynch since most of these suspicions arise from the way the lynch was shifted away from him yesterday.
I'm finding I don't really have many strong town reads. I still think LC is town and I lean slightly town on Charle but Id mark the rest as neutral to scummy.

Is this Fusi asking the same queas me or preparing for swang to be used as a fall guy?fusibaseball wrote:The vote swap to DDS at the eleventh hour was a little weird to me. How did 4 people come to separate conclusions within 4 hours that DDS should be voted instead of Swang? Seems like to me there's a layer of protection for Swang.

This is the deciding vote. (Strike and Devante voted after the deadline, it seems. Their votes aren't in the end of day tally.)kongming3 wrote:Unvote Vote DDS


This is bizarrely daft. The very steering that Rags mentions is the incrimination.Ragian wrote: Decent stuff. But what I don't get about the Swang suspicion is that if scum - as several people have suggested - indeed steered the lynch away from swang and onto DDS, how does that necessarily incriminate swang? Any experienced scum would make sure that they picked a townie as a fall guy D2. And here we are.

I brought strike up late on Wednesday after a post he had just made seemed all wrong to me. I'm airing suspicions when they really strike me.Ragian wrote:Why did you bring him up late, then?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

Wow Ragian, of course can we work with that.Ragian wrote: How will we be able to work with it? What will you deduce from a lynch if swang flips either scum or town?
Also the final votecount.Extreme Ways wrote:
Votecount:
swang (6) - Vot, charle, fusibaseball, pix, strike wolf, kingm
Charle (1) - PMC
Votanic (2) - swang, LC
Strike (1) - ragian
Swang is on L-1
