***Finn Rock Fallout*** -- Game Over ~ Infected Win

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:25 pm

cram, if we get another read from auto, we'll have a better idea if he can be trusted or not, if he investigates someone highly suspect, I suggest Master Bush, or me for that matter.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:25 pm

wicked wrote:smart move cram, I take back the bad things I said about you. what's the harm in taking it a little slower so everyone has a chance to weigh in. It's only friday, we have until sunday.

let's never fight again, lol.

PS - FOS on you still

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:26 pm

Master Bush wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
Master Bush wrote:The faster we lynch one when know more about the other, and for that matter anyone who seems to be connected to the other.

Huh?

The sooner we lynch you, the sooner we know if we can trust autoload or not. If you are mafia, then it's safe to say that Rev and Wicked are also mafia. If you are not Mafia, then it's safe to say that Autoload is, as well as Dussle.

Someone's a tad impatient. As Wicked said, we've got until Sunday, so I'm gonna do a bit of bandwagoning action.

Unvote AK_Iceman
Vote No Lynch

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:27 pm

wicked wrote:cram, if we get another read from auto, we'll have a better idea if he can be trusted or not, if he investigates someone highly suspect, I suggest Master Bush, or me for that matter.

..and then don't we have to hang THAT person to know if we can "trust his read"? but then we're already 1 person down!

wicked i may be stupid here, but this sounds like bullsh*t. i'm willing to wait this out for someone else to weigh in, but that sounds like crap to me.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:27 pm

wicked wrote:what do we learn by not lynching IC?

1. Whether Auto's reads can be trusted or not, which will help us out much more in the future.

I dont understand why you are so passionate about saving AK unless you are connected with him?

Also, how do we find out if auto is lying or not by not lynching? How do we know if he's an insane cop or not by lynching. He will still investigate someone and will be told the same thing. And we still wont know if it's right or not? Voting out AK will prove if he IS the cop for sure if AK is mafia.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:27 pm

Master Bush wrote:The sooner we lynch you, the sooner we know if we can trust autoload or not. If you are mafia, then it's safe to say that Rev and Wicked are also mafia. If you are not Mafia, then it's safe to say that Autoload is, as well as Dussle.

Wow, MB, that's pretty tidy, but you're completely ignoring the fact auto could be an insane cop. How convenient of you.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:29 pm

wicked's defense of AK is becoming too desperate. i think they're both mafia.

VOTE AK_Iceman

Freetymes · Post by **Freetymes** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:30 pm

Damn! 6 pages in a couple hours and I have to read it on dial up at home... sigh.

A lot has happend and I am trying to digest it so I will not comment yet except to say that I think there is a lot of people yelling accusations and giving away things that should be kept for later if or when the townie / mafia ratio gets closer.

Cram you are heading up the mob so I am glad to see you being more cautious. I did what you are doing in the last game and led the charge to lynch the wrong person and the mafia won because of it. I do not want to go 2 and 0 in this game.

You are also right that my vote for RK is useless at this point so for now I...

UN-VOTE REV. KYLE

VOTE NO LYNCH

I will think more about the current accusations and look back with this new info in mind...

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:30 pm

No, all you and AK have done since votes started towards him is bring up the insane cop thing, but there's a good chance there's no insane cop in this game. So I'm not gonna do or not do something based on a "what if" from the people who are getting attention and votes.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:30 pm

supercram wrote:good point. i'll wait for this. i'm a reasonable man.

UNVOTE AK_iceman

to give him a chance to have his name cleared and put the brakes on mob mentality

10 minutes later....

supercram wrote:wicked's defense of AK is becoming too desperate. i think they're both mafia.

VOTE AK_Iceman

You really are a reasonable man... :roll:

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:30 pm

Vote Count

(6) AK_iceman -- (Mach, Autoload, M. Bush, Trestain, Bogusbet, Supercram)
(1) Supercram -- (Broomhead)
(1) Autoload -- (Moz)
(6) No Lynch -- (Backglass, Wicked, Xenhu, AK_iceman, Dussle, Freetymes)
Not Voting, Everyone Else

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

--Andy

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm

Master Bush wrote:No, all you and AK have done since votes started towards him is bring up the insane cop thing, but there's a good chance there's no insane cop in this game. So I'm not gonna do or not do something based on a "what if" from the people who are getting attention and votes.

That was towards Wicked.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Fine Cram, then have Auto investigate me tonight and lynch me tomorrow. I have no special role like a mason, so you won't be losing anything.

The more MB posts, the more I'm sure he is mafia. I'd be willing to vote for him tonight instead of a no lynch. either way.

supercram · Post by **supercram** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:32 pm

AK_iceman wrote:
supercram wrote:good point. i'll wait for this. i'm a reasonable man.

UNVOTE AK_iceman

to give him a chance to have his name cleared and put the brakes on mob mentality

10 minutes later....

supercram wrote:wicked's defense of AK is becoming too desperate. i think they're both mafia.

VOTE AK_Iceman

You really are a reasonable man...

it seems like wicked is grasping at straws to save you. that's what changed my mind. besides, dussle switched to no lynch and i don't want you to get too comfy and slip away.

Bogusbet · Post by **Bogusbet** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:32 pm

I dont like to do this but I'm so un-sure.

Un-Vote AK_iceman

VOTE - NO LYNCH

Bogusbet · Post by **Bogusbet** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:32 pm

Auto you were close, but not enough yet.

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:33 pm

To counteract Bogus's vote:

Unvote No Lynch
Vote AK_Iceman

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:35 pm

yes, it does seem desperate, and I'm not even 100% sure IC isn't mafia...lol. I just see the reasons for voting for him are flawed, and I see a lot of bandwagoning. But having played with IC now for 3-4 games (?), I can say he doesn't appear to be acting like mafia to me. If he has me fooled, so be it.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:35 pm

Vote Count

(6) AK_iceman -- (Mach, Autoload, M. Bush, Trestain, Supercram, Dussle)
(1) Supercram -- (Broomhead)
(1) Autoload -- (Moz)
(6) No Lynch -- (Backglass, Wicked, Xenhu, AK_iceman, Freetymes, Bogusbet)
Not Voting, Everyone Else

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

--Andy

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:35 pm

dussle wrote:To counteract Bogus's vote:

Unvote No Lynch
Vote AK_Iceman

What the hell is the matter with you noob?

You have voted for 4 different things in the past couple hours.
You are stupid, please stop voting.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:35 pm

wicked wrote:Fine Cram, then have Auto investigate me tonight and lynch me tomorrow. I have no special role like a mason, so you won't be losing anything.

The more MB posts, the more I'm sure he is mafia. I'd be willing to vote for him tonight instead of a no lynch. either way.

It's funny, but the more you become connected with AK and get in deep, the more you throw my name out there as mafia. So you clearly have used me as your scapegoat in this game. That's fine. But you still have not giving a reason as to why you dont think AK is mafia, and why you are always defending him.

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:35 pm

For your sake? No.

Bogusbet · Post by **Bogusbet** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:36 pm

dussle wrote:To counteract Bogus's vote:

Unvote No Lynch
Vote AK_Iceman

Nice move.

Un-VOTE NO LYNCH

VOTE DUSSLE

Why you set yourself up boy? If I'm wrong I'm sorry but you have had me worried.

If AK is one of them, we get him later.

dussle · Post by **dussle** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:36 pm

dussle wrote:For your sake? No.

In response to AK.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:36 pm

AK_iceman wrote:You are stupid, please stop voting.

LMAO!!!