It's possible that the only reason I was successfully blocked is that rds' boomerang has been upgraded. I don't know why/how it worked on me, (or even why Mr. S told me that I was blocked)... but that's how it happened on me.
Rather than just discussing my role, perhaps someone could refute my actual defenses of the cases on me. Right now I have a bunch of votes but no new evidence. This could be a case of mafia trying to pin an easy lynch. Drunk presented a good case on me, I will admit, that seems like a very scummy set of statements. However, not one person has addressed my defense.
The other cases on me are that BG wants me lynched because I asked for a player to be prodded. Um... I am not sure I can answer to that one lol.
MoB just thinks I am scummy but doesn't know why. Um... I am not sure I can answer to that one lol.
If this is really what you want to decide, you want to lynch me based on hunches, that's fine too, I guess. I am not very useful to town if I am going to be roleblocked every night (the main use of a commuter being that it is harder to target me for a night kill). After I am dead, hopefully you can learn from voting patterns who is scum.
DoomYoshi wrote:
MoB just thinks I am scummy but doesn't know why. Um... I am not sure I can answer to that one lol.
If this is really what you want to decide, you want to lynch me based on hunches, that's fine too, I guess. I am not very useful to town if I am going to be roleblocked every night (the main use of a commuter being that it is harder to target me for a night kill). After I am dead, hopefully you can learn from voting patterns who is scum.
I've thought you were scummy based upon voting patterns, it's just hard to build a case around it because I was one of the people that defended killboy too. We defended killboy for one reason or another. Someone here didn't vote for him or defended him because he was on their team and thats who we have to catch.
I suppose I will unvote for now, not that im 100% sold on your role, even though it DOES make sense to have the postman in the game
Im gonna go with my gut here. I thought your actions before looked suspect and SOMEONE has to pay for defending killboy. Your role claim does sound convincing, but there are little things about it that make me doubt it.
Alright, I'm convinced Doomyopshi is scum. I wasn't before exactly, but I don't think commuters can be roleblocked and if he didn't use his action then there would be no use in roleblocking him. Vote DoomYoshi
Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to defeat all evil. -Ephesians 6 KJV
My Smiley: ( ) --- it's got SHIELDS!
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
This is just absurd. I strongly believe DoomYoshi to be town. Commuter is so obscure, it would surprise me if that were provided as a fake claim. And even if it was a fake claim, why would he say that his commute was roleblocked (thereby validating rds' claim), when he could have easily said he didn't know (as per a normal Commuter) - the latter is a much more beneficial route to take for mafia - it doesn't verify rds' claim, and it sticks with the traditional functionality of a Commuter.
Plus, with shield's bandwagoning vote just above, I am even more convinced he's scum.
killboy108 wrote:
I don't see any strong evidence that points to anyone being scum at this stage. Since we're forced to make a call I'll vote Shield Generator because he seems to try to cast suspicion on other players as scum more than other people, like when he has a go at BG and others who voted for Rds as though they're scummy for band-wagoning.
Im still leaning toward Doom because I don't think Killboy would try to keep the BW going on shield
Hey! What is the vote count? I was hoping to hear from C9 but that looks unlikely. Not sure who I should vote for. Yoshi seems the most convincing case to me I will have another read through and make a decision.
MoB Deadly wrote:I'm still leaning toward Doom because I don't think Killboy would try to keep the BW going on shield
Interesting, this point could cause me to reconsider my position. Had anyone played with Killboy before, or interacted with him at all, enough to apply meta game logic to his actions? Would he refuse to vote for a scummate? Would he be smart enough to considere the circumstances of the situation and possibly vote against scum mates in order to hide his relations to them? Would he not bother thinking about any of this and vote for shield for no reason?
While I am on the subject of meta gaming, does anyone know dazza's mafia abilities enough to hazard a guess if dazza would be able to come up with the idea of faking a post restriction in order to establish fake innocence from the start?
spiesr wrote:While I am on the subject of meta gaming, does anyone know dazza's mafia abilities enough to hazard a guess if dazza would be able to come up with the idea of faking a post restriction in order to establish fake innocence from the start?
I don't know dazza's style well enough, but that was a point I made in my first case of the day. I'm very suspicious of dazza's claim & voting habits.
MoB Deadly wrote:I'm still leaning toward Doom because I don't think Killboy would try to keep the BW going on shield
Interesting, this point could cause me to reconsider my position. Had anyone played with Killboy before, or interacted with him at all, enough to apply meta game logic to his actions? Would he refuse to vote for a scummate? Would he be smart enough to considere the circumstances of the situation and possibly vote against scum mates in order to hide his relations to them? Would he not bother thinking about any of this and vote for shield for no reason?
While I am on the subject of meta gaming, does anyone know dazza's mafia abilities enough to hazard a guess if dazza would be able to come up with the idea of faking a post restriction in order to establish fake innocence from the start?
I am in his clan... however, I haven't played mafia with him before.
) --- it's got SHIELDS!
