Moderator: Clan Directors
Rodion wrote:If that were the case, I could have simply voted for 21 and raised the odds of getting the easy way out. But think whatever you want.nikola_milicki wrote:u still havent voted cuz u dont feel like letting go on such an easy way out of this challenge.. this says a lot about u man..
I think it's certain members of KORT who are drawing this out, not the clan as a whole. As a whole they are a good group. Don't judge them by their loudest or most offensive. Between this decision and the 12 hour debate while we were in a challenge with them, it's pretty clear there are very different opinions in the clan.the.killing.44 wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but despite the results of the vote, some respect for KORT will be lost on my end.

I apologise for making a sweeping closing statement that tarred the clan with the same brush, as I appreciate you're obviously going through a democratic process of debating and voting on what measures to impose. Probably the heat of the moment got the better of me as I felt NiMic's post to be unwarranted given that all I was seeking was some resolution after 36 hours had elapsed and not a single member of KORT had made a comment. Thankfully Bruce responded and put my mind at rest (please appreciate the burden I've had to shoulder having let down my clan through no fault of any of its members other than myself). So please don't be too surprised to see me pushing for a resolution as ultimately I am the one who bears responsibilty for this issue arising in the first place.Personally I find it offensive that it has taken so long for you to reach a decision. It would never happen in an honourable clan. So there you go....there's your smoking gun.



Chariot of Fire wrote:Well, I'm completely astonished that this is the decision you've reached. I honestly never thought a clan could bring itself to win in such a manner. Nevertheless the rules were broken and you were entirely within your right to exercise the penalty clause to its fullest extent. Congratulations.
Long may the shame of your decision hang over your heads; beyond the time in which you savour the taste of your hollow victory.

Ummm... are you retarded?Snowgun wrote: Oh, how the tune has changed from a couple pages ago.
While I personally would prefer that this rule had been implemented different initially, the rule is the rule, and the bait and switch from "We will understand either way" to "You cowardly pussies" is a little hypocritical.
Yeah, you're retarded.Chariot of Fire wrote:There must be, however, a certain number who evidently feel TOFU should be punished to the full letter of the law, or at least beyond what may be construed a fair and just compromise. Well I'm sorry, but for anyone who could entertain such an idea I have nothing but contempt. If any member of TOFU even raised such a notion then I wouldn't want him in the clan (but then I know none of them would - it's just who we are).
nikola_milicki wrote:... I believe I speak for all who prefer to do their challenges the right way, on the battle field.. if there is any other way it sure as hell aint the silliest rule ever..

Freudian slip???Bruceswar wrote:The member of KORT have reached a decision:

I presume it was important to stick primarily to the letter of the law. Maybe if we had kept our comments regarding cowardice to ourselves and that may have made a difference, tho I agree that it shouldn't have mattered.nikola_milicki wrote:lmfao, not even smart enough to mask their cowardice by accepting a more reasonable punishment like maybe 3 games forfeit, which would prolly be enough to win the challenge anyway..
Lubawski wrote:Freudian slip???Bruceswar wrote:The member of KORT have reached a decision:

jpcloet wrote:I was under the impression most suggested to replay. That is generally the best option.
Bruce ur post is full of nothing.. U guys dont even protect urselves from ppl like me who keep calling u cowards with no balls, guess u have made ur peace with what u all are, Cowards of the round table!Bruceswar wrote:The member of KORT have reached a decision:
I will start by saying this decision was surely not an easy one to come to. We debated amongst ourselves for a few days now. When I first contact chuuuuck about the violation, I was gung ho on 21 games being taken along with a few others. We then had those who wanted a lesser penalty. I stepped away from the issue for some time so I could clear my head and think more reasonable and step away from the "gung ho" thoughts. We as KORT were debating it out in our forums MSN and other places. It was largely split. In fact this vote drew out more voters than any other we have had in KORT. It goes to show you this was a big issue for us. Many in KORT / TOFU have invested many hours in this challenge so a quick decision was not something we wanted to come to. These things take a bit more time to come to a decision we can all live with in KORT. With all this being said the behind the scenes debate kept going until I made a time frame for us which would be tonight to have a final decision.
I will not go into how the debate went or which members were on which side, but it became pretty one sided. We as KORT stand together as a clan, and no matter what anybody outside of KORT will say or think our decision is just that "ours". Anybody looking from the outside of this challenge could have said they would do "X", but like Lubawski said only those within the challenge can really say what they want.
In closing KORT wishes to follow the rules as stated. 21 games will be forfeited.
We as members of KORT hope things will not escalate any further.
On a side note, I find it amusing how people complained this challenge was not amiable and THOTA's one is going in the same direction before it even starts!nikola_milicki wrote:Bruce ur post is full of nothing.. U guys dont even protect urselves from ppl like me who keep calling u cowards with no balls, guess u have made ur peace with what u all are, Cowards of the round table!Bruceswar wrote:The member of KORT have reached a decision:
I will start by saying this decision was surely not an easy one to come to. We debated amongst ourselves for a few days now. When I first contact chuuuuck about the violation, I was gung ho on 21 games being taken along with a few others. We then had those who wanted a lesser penalty. I stepped away from the issue for some time so I could clear my head and think more reasonable and step away from the "gung ho" thoughts. We as KORT were debating it out in our forums MSN and other places. It was largely split. In fact this vote drew out more voters than any other we have had in KORT. It goes to show you this was a big issue for us. Many in KORT / TOFU have invested many hours in this challenge so a quick decision was not something we wanted to come to. These things take a bit more time to come to a decision we can all live with in KORT. With all this being said the behind the scenes debate kept going until I made a time frame for us which would be tonight to have a final decision.
I will not go into how the debate went or which members were on which side, but it became pretty one sided. We as KORT stand together as a clan, and no matter what anybody outside of KORT will say or think our decision is just that "ours". Anybody looking from the outside of this challenge could have said they would do "X", but like Lubawski said only those within the challenge can really say what they want.
In closing KORT wishes to follow the rules as stated. 21 games will be forfeited.
We as members of KORT hope things will not escalate any further.
please tell sjnap to stop making an ass out of himself on my wall.. or at least help him write less ridiculous insults..
Maybe Thota breaks the rules blatantly, having 2 or 3 players play over 20 games, just to give KORT the CC victory they so desperately want.....danryan wrote:Lubawski wrote:Freudian slip???Bruceswar wrote:The member of KORT have reached a decision:![]()
Nicely played.
The final is going to be interesting, I bet THOTA check their game count very carefully. As far as results in clan wars this challenge should be voided completely though. It'd be ridiculous to count 36 wins for KORT in a clan war, even if for the purposes of the CCup the rules were followed exactly. Especially since the database will reflect the correct results of the games.
The LOW - TOFU matchup should be a classic. Kronos vs Zeus?

Yesterday was a holiday for me, so I'm just now catching up on this.josko.ri wrote:if you have any issues with that, you could do what Dako and Foxglove agreed to be done if any issue appears. here is pm where it was made deal about that:Chariot of Fire wrote: Whilst I wasn't the one who lodged the complaint, I did however support it. It wasn't a hard decision when you consider the events that prompted it (to have a script, known only to yourselves, that puts "josko for xxxxxx" every time a turn is played....well what reaction did you try to get or expect?).
Sent: 09 Sep 2010, 17:19
From: Dako
To: Masli Chariot of Fire Foxglove Bruceswar
so foxy officially asked Dako in pm to first initiate discussion with our leaders before put any issue outside.Dako wrote:That is why I sent you a PM without doing anything in public.Foxglove wrote:In closing, if you have an issue with someone in KORT that is serious enough that you believe it warrants involvement and punishment from the site administrators, please initiate a discussion with us about it prior to making threats.
I have already talked to Masli over MSN (a week ago maybe) that josko was overreacting in the challenge thread - he told me he will talk to him. Josko apologized in thread but in a few days he started to troll games as well as challenge thread again. So I am reminding you again that it is not a behavior we expect from top clan we are facing and we would like you to deal with it because it is discomfortable for us to war in such way.
Cheers,
Daniel.
that s what you should do, just follow the agreement that foxy and Dako made in that pm.