Moderator: Community Team
Woodruff wrote:
Where did she say there was media that was not biased at all? She said they work very hard to be. Perhaps it is yourself that you should feel sorry for.
targetman377 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:InkL0sed wrote:saxitoxin wrote:This is a logical fallacy, specifically what - and excuse if I butcher the Latin - is called a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter.
OH SHIT LATIN
YOU MUST BE SUPER DUPER SMART
Illegitimi non carborundum
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:empirically, it is evident that humans will not sacrifice their own resources in the name of societal welfare if there is not some organizational body which requires or reminds them to do it
in denying the antecedent you are now committing a second logical fallacy
you did this previously, where you assume "Not X" implies "Not Y" just because X = y
Again, I regret can only respond to arguments based in Logic and Reason. Arguments based in other cognitive modalities are of no interest to me.
Thanks, Mesfanmax!
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Targetman wrote:.
residentlunatic wrote:the truth is that too many people, particularly those under 30, don't even know enough to recognize the left wing, because they have never heard anything but far right and less far right
InkLosed wrote:YOU MUST BE SUPER DUPER SMART
PLAYER57832 wrote:(source: Ralph Nadar on Health care).
jimboston wrote:.. Yes and at least where I live all local taxes are property taxes. So your point is moot.
jimboston wrote:Is that 'veggie-steak' and 'tofu-chicken'?
metsfanmax wrote:95% of political scientists think that you're wrong.
No one wrote:Can you give us one topical example of why the west is such a filthy and barbarous place filled with imbeciles and fellatio idled automatons?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 because most people are NOT happy with our system "as is".
#2 because we cannot afford to continue with the status quo.
jimboston wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 because most people are NOT happy with our system "as is".
#2 because we cannot afford to continue with the status quo.
This may or may not be true. I have seen many polls that disagree with you, and most people I talk to personally want the gov't to keep their corrupt hands off the healthcare system. I don't know who you are talking to... people who prefer the nanny-state Obama is leading us to I would guess.
However... my comments to P where in response to his suggestion that I was not qualified to decide on liking the US system best, because I have not lived under other systems.
Your retort does not address my point.
saxitoxin wrote:jimboston wrote:.. Yes and at least where I live all local taxes are property taxes. So your point is moot.
All people pay property taxes. 99%+ of people are domiciled. If you rent, you pay property taxes via your rent in the form of pass-along from your slum lord. Your point is moot. Side out, Saxi. Saxi to serve.
saxitoxin wrote:jimboston wrote:Is that 'veggie-steak' and 'tofu-chicken'?
Naturally. Meat is murder. It takes 9 kilos of vegetable protein to produce 1 kilo of animal protein. The nations of the filthy capitalistic west, because of their power, can force poorer nations to second their agriculture to feed the west's farm animals, instead of feeding their own people.
saxitoxin wrote:
Today, July 7, is the anniversary of the 1927 General Strike called by the IWW and American Communist Party over the conviction of Nicola Sacco and Bartholomew Vanzetti for the crime of passing through a neighborhood in Boston that was off-limits to Italians. Despite the fact that half-a-million Americans took to the streets in a show of radical solidarity, within 2 months they would both be murdered in the Massachusetts electric chair, slaughtered by The Insect.
PLAYER57832 wrote:jimboston wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 because most people are NOT happy with our system "as is".
#2 because we cannot afford to continue with the status quo.
This may or may not be true. I have seen many polls that disagree with you, and most people I talk to personally want the gov't to keep their corrupt hands off the healthcare system. I don't know who you are talking to... people who prefer the nanny-state Obama is leading us to I would guess.
However... my comments to P where in response to his suggestion that I was not qualified to decide on liking the US system best, because I have not lived under other systems.
Your retort does not address my point.
hmm, well.. I did go back. There is a big difference between visiting another country and living there. Were you sick or injured while there? Do you have any long-term experiences with family and friends who are there?
I have all of the above.
Don't mistake normal grousing/griping about things not being perfect with true, anguished fear and loathing. Most people who say they are "happy with" US health care don't really have much experience with it, because they are healthy.
jimboston wrote:saxitoxin wrote:jimboston wrote:.. Yes and at least where I live all local taxes are property taxes. So your point is moot.
All people pay property taxes. 99%+ of people are domiciled. If you rent, you pay property taxes via your rent in the form of pass-along from your slum lord. Your point is moot. Side out, Saxi. Saxi to serve.
Well duh... that's obviously Economics 101.
Few retorts...
-> I don't know where you live, but I doubt anyone here would agree with the logical statement "Landlord = Slumlord". It is true that "Some Landlords are Slumlord", and it's also true that "All Slumlords are Landlords"; but it is NOT tur that "All Landlords are Slumlords".
-> You talk about other people's logic failures... how about your obvious one??? "All people pay property taces. 99% or people are domiciled." So I guess there is a percentage there that don't pay property taxes then... right. LOL Of course you also forget the precentage of people that live in subsidized housing. They pay no property tax either.
-> The people who rent and pay property tax via pass-through... two things;
1) They do benefit from services associated with those taxes you know.
2) The Landlord may not always pass through the whole amount and/or often needs to adjust the base rent to make the total comparable to other nearby communities with different tax rates. There is freedom of movement and decision making for the renter here... they can more easily move to and more quickly react to cost-increase versus local-services benefit.
Oh wait... Jim is contesting that point and the Mac-Cam is out. The judges are reviewing, and the decision... game-set-match for Jim.saxitoxin wrote:jimboston wrote:Is that 'veggie-steak' and 'tofu-chicken'?
Naturally. Meat is murder. It takes 9 kilos of vegetable protein to produce 1 kilo of animal protein. The nations of the filthy capitalistic west, because of their power, can force poorer nations to second their agriculture to feed the west's farm animals, instead of feeding their own people.
So honestly... you do eat meat, right? I mean you say you do and then you say you don't.saxitoxin wrote:
Today, July 7, is the anniversary of the 1927 General Strike called by the IWW and American Communist Party over the conviction of Nicola Sacco and Bartholomew Vanzetti for the crime of passing through a neighborhood in Boston that was off-limits to Italians. Despite the fact that half-a-million Americans took to the streets in a show of radical solidarity, within 2 months they would both be murdered in the Massachusetts electric chair, slaughtered by The Insect.
You don't really believe that Sacco and Vanzetti where 'heroes'; convicted and murdered illegally... do you?
This is like one of the biggest myths of the Left out there. I am amazed how many people buy into this without doing research.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:
Mets - you're a cute kid and, as I noted, I was just sending you up before for the private benefit of 2 other users and myself who have been chuckling at some of your posts in another thread when it was patently clear you'd just finished a Logic 101 class.
However, your above missive really takes the cake!I won't delve into it, though, because I'm starting to like your spunky, can-do attitude.
You have a lot of potential, MFM - the physical sciences will be lucky to have you.
mestfan wrote:And the rapists/murderers/thieves/pedophiles who form your fictitious collective will be very lucky to have you.
Snorri1234 wrote:man, I could troll this thread better than sax.
jimboston wrote:It is true that "Some Landlords are Slumlord", and it's also true that "All Slumlords are Landlords"; but it is NOT tur that "All Landlords are Slumlords".
jimboston wrote:I don't know where you live, but I doubt anyone here would agree with the logical statement "Landlord = Slumlord".
jimboston wrote:So honestly... you do eat meat, right?
jimboston wrote:You don't really believe that Sacco and Vanzetti where 'heroes'; convicted and murdered illegally... do you?

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxic wrote:mestfan wrote:And the rapists/murderers/thieves/pedophiles who form your fictitious collective will be very lucky to have you.
A colleague of mine once had a patient like you. Half the time he would display a pseudo-neurotic obsession with logic. When questioned about it he would erupt into semi-lucid ranting. We actually published a paper on this patient in Zeitschrift für Moderne Psychotherapie & Gesellschaft. Check it out - it was back in '87, titled (IIRC) "On the Origins of Jekkyl & Hyde Symptoms in Delusional Parasitosis."
The Club's really going to be in trouble when you start taking sentential calculus next year. Whoooa boy ...![]()
Metsfanmax wrote:saxitoxic wrote:mestfan wrote:And the rapists/murderers/thieves/pedophiles who form your fictitious collective will be very lucky to have you.
A colleague of mine once had a patient like you. Half the time he would display a pseudo-neurotic obsession with logic. When questioned about it he would erupt into semi-lucid ranting. We actually published a paper on this patient in Zeitschrift für Moderne Psychotherapie & Gesellschaft. Check it out - it was back in '87, titled (IIRC) "On the Origins of Jekkyl & Hyde Symptoms in Delusional Parasitosis."
The Club's really going to be in trouble when you start taking sentential calculus next year. Whoooa boy ...![]()
Well, at least his ranting was semi-lucid. Nothing you say makes one bit of sense.
And speaking of delusions, it sounds like you're imagining papers that you didn't write...
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Metsfanmax wrote:The entire field of psychology is based on the fallacy of misplaced concreteness...
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
jimboston wrote:Saxi's concreteness.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:jimboston wrote:Saxi's concreteness.
If that's code for irregularity ...
jimboston wrote:saxitoxin wrote:jimboston wrote:Saxi's concreteness.
If that's code for irregularity ...
Or code for the concrete in your head.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:The entire field of psychology is based on the fallacy of misplaced concreteness...
You started so well ... a cold, detached, Spock-like conjurer of Reason - an architect of Logic, albeit one with an understanding of which had not entirely developed.
But, as soon as the Tickle Typhoon hit you cast all that into the bin and became a purveyor of irrationality, tossing rotten fruit and galumphing through the streets, mumbling incomprehensible rants at the head of the crazed and screaming mob.
And all it took was a few tickles.
*tickle tickle*
*Saxi tickles Metsfanmax*
(don't fret, Player got it worse, once)