Moderator: Community Team
Anytime we can get Biden into a debate, I'm happy. I don't typically care for debates any more,Phatscotty wrote:On the other hand....Paul Ryan vs. Joe Biden in a national debate!
W.Bush was the last Republicrat I voted for. And never again. (Except Ron Paul of course)Frigidus wrote:So who else isn't voting for either of the assholes the two major parties are running? I'm still not sure which third party/write in I'm going to go with, but I certainly won't be providing any legitimacy to the big business duopoly.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
It's just as okay to vote against someone as it is to vote for someone. Sometimes, you have to be a protector of the Republic, and not always "savior or nothing!"jay_a2j wrote:W.Bush was the last Republicrat I voted for. And never again. (Except Ron Paul of course)Frigidus wrote:So who else isn't voting for either of the assholes the two major parties are running? I'm still not sure which third party/write in I'm going to go with, but I certainly won't be providing any legitimacy to the big business duopoly.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
I'm of the opinion that the Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin. Both are taking this country where they want it to go, they "appear" as if there are great differences between them when in reality they are working together towards the same end. The end of a republic. I choose not to vote for that end.Phatscotty wrote:It's just as okay to vote against someone as it is to vote for someone. Sometimes, you have to be a protector of the Republic, and not always "savior or nothing!"jay_a2j wrote:W.Bush was the last Republicrat I voted for. And never again. (Except Ron Paul of course)Frigidus wrote:So who else isn't voting for either of the assholes the two major parties are running? I'm still not sure which third party/write in I'm going to go with, but I certainly won't be providing any legitimacy to the big business duopoly.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
I'd agree with this though I agree one party will get us to that "same end" at a slower pace so I feel as though I have to vote for that.jay_a2j wrote:I'm of the opinion that the Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin. Both are taking this country where they want it to go, they "appear" as if there are great differences between them when in reality they are working together towards the same end. The end of a republic. I choose not to vote for that end.Phatscotty wrote:It's just as okay to vote against someone as it is to vote for someone. Sometimes, you have to be a protector of the Republic, and not always "savior or nothing!"jay_a2j wrote:W.Bush was the last Republicrat I voted for. And never again. (Except Ron Paul of course)Frigidus wrote:So who else isn't voting for either of the assholes the two major parties are running? I'm still not sure which third party/write in I'm going to go with, but I certainly won't be providing any legitimacy to the big business duopoly.
I know many people who feel the same as you. If I'm about the be robbed, beaten and left for dead by either someone who will do it quickly or someone who will take his time, I'm going to choose the 3rd guy who has no intention of harming me. This is just me not wanting to support in any way the altering of America. Our freedoms are being taken away slowly. Because their chances of succeeding greatly increases if our freedoms are taken from us slowly, not causing alarm. I see the Major of NYC wanting to ban 20 oz. soda's, banning salt on the tables of restaurants, banning smoking in private businesses as an assault on FREEDOM. But as you can see most people just comply with any new government regulation. It has been suggested in NY that a law be passed to outlaw smoking in your car if there are children in it. They will have to just arrest me.patrickaa317 wrote:
I'd agree with this though I agree one party will get us to that "same end" at a slower pace so I feel as though I have to vote for that.
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
If you did vote independent, or if you could vote for anyone, who would it be?jay_a2j wrote:I'm of the opinion that the Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin. Both are taking this country where they want it to go, they "appear" as if there are great differences between them when in reality they are working together towards the same end. The end of a republic. I choose not to vote for that end.Phatscotty wrote:It's just as okay to vote against someone as it is to vote for someone. Sometimes, you have to be a protector of the Republic, and not always "savior or nothing!"jay_a2j wrote:W.Bush was the last Republicrat I voted for. And never again. (Except Ron Paul of course)Frigidus wrote:So who else isn't voting for either of the assholes the two major parties are running? I'm still not sure which third party/write in I'm going to go with, but I certainly won't be providing any legitimacy to the big business duopoly.
lolGreecePwns wrote:Romney/Ryan 2012
Because it's just as okay to vote against someone as it is to vote for someone.

loved that ad! +80 SaxBucks to Scott for historical referencePhatscotty wrote:There is a Marxist sitting in the White House. Is that really okay with you?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
That is true. But who is more likely to be moved by a Tea Party majority in the house sending legislation to a Republican majority in the Senate.....Obama? or Romney?patrickaa317 wrote:I'd agree with this though I agree one party will get us to that "same end" at a slower pace so I feel as though I have to vote for that.jay_a2j wrote:I'm of the opinion that the Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin. Both are taking this country where they want it to go, they "appear" as if there are great differences between them when in reality they are working together towards the same end. The end of a republic. I choose not to vote for that end.Phatscotty wrote:It's just as okay to vote against someone as it is to vote for someone. Sometimes, you have to be a protector of the Republic, and not always "savior or nothing!"jay_a2j wrote:W.Bush was the last Republicrat I voted for. And never again. (Except Ron Paul of course)Frigidus wrote:So who else isn't voting for either of the assholes the two major parties are running? I'm still not sure which third party/write in I'm going to go with, but I certainly won't be providing any legitimacy to the big business duopoly.
Smoking in a car with kids in it? jay, your drug addiction is spiralling out of control. seek help.jay_a2j wrote:It has been suggested in NY that a law be passed to outlaw smoking in your car if there are children in it. They will have to just arrest me.

Phatscotty wrote:There is a Marxist sitting in the White House. Is that really okay with you?
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
BigBallinStalin wrote: If you did vote independent, or if you could vote for anyone, who would it be?
("Jesus" or "God" is not an option at this ballot).
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
There is a troll in our fora. Why is that ok with the moderators?Phatscotty wrote:There is a Marxist sitting in the White House. Is that really okay with you?
If it wasn't for you, Phatscotty, I'd never get any reliable news!Phatscotty wrote:What's going on with CNN lately? First, Fareed Zacharia gets suspended for plagiarizing in an overzealous hit piece against gun ownership, and now Soledad O'brien is caught plagiarizing a blog site! People at MSNBC get suspended and call in sick and take long vacation all the time. Bob Beckel, one of the many Liberals on Fox has been suspended a few times in just the last few months, something Glenn Beck never managed to do once. NBC has fired numerous people for editing tapes, such as in the Zimmerman case. ABC is about to fire Brian Ross.....
The left leaning media has lost A LOT of their credibility this year. That is the same media that Obama had in his pocket in 2008. I don't think controlling the media is going to work this time...
I know right! When so many at CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, and TIME are getting fired and suspended, it really opens the door for us little guys!AndyDufresne wrote:If it wasn't for you, Phatscotty, I'd never get any reliable news!Phatscotty wrote:What's going on with CNN lately? First, Fareed Zacharia gets suspended for plagiarizing in an overzealous hit piece against gun ownership, and now Soledad O'brien is caught plagiarizing a blog site! People at MSNBC get suspended and call in sick and take long vacation all the time. Bob Beckel, one of the many Liberals on Fox has been suspended a few times in just the last few months, something Glenn Beck never managed to do once. NBC has fired numerous people for editing tapes, such as in the Zimmerman case. ABC is about to fire Brian Ross.....
The left leaning media has lost A LOT of their credibility this year. That is the same media that Obama had in his pocket in 2008. I don't think controlling the media is going to work this time...
--Andy
Let me get this straight...the fact that "the left leaning media" has been reprimanding and disciplining their reporters for misconduct is somehow a reason why "the left leaning media has lost A LOT of their credibility this year"? That actually makes sense to you?Phatscotty wrote:What's going on with CNN lately? First, Fareed Zacharia gets suspended for plagiarizing in an overzealous hit piece against gun ownership, and now Soledad O'brien is caught plagiarizing a blog site! People at MSNBC get suspended and call in sick and take long vacation all the time. Bob Beckel, one of the many Liberals on Fox has been suspended a few times in just the last few months, something Glenn Beck never managed to do once. NBC has fired numerous people for editing tapes, such as in the Zimmerman case. ABC is about to fire Brian Ross for his overzealous witch hunting.....
The left leaning media has lost A LOT of their credibility this year. That is the same media that Obama had in his pocket in 2008. I don't think controlling the media is going to work this time...
Okay, i shit you not....this just happened about an hour ago. Perhaps there is something to what I have been sayingPhatscotty wrote:What's going on with CNN lately? First, Fareed Zacharia gets suspended for plagiarizing in an overzealous hit piece against gun ownership, and now Soledad O'brien is caught plagiarizing a blog site! People at MSNBC get suspended and call in sick and take long vacation all the time. Bob Beckel, one of the many Liberals on Fox has been suspended a few times in just the last few months, something Glenn Beck never managed to do once. NBC has fired numerous people for editing tapes, such as in the Zimmerman case. ABC is about to fire Brian Ross.....
Where's the trolling? Phatscotty made an evaluative statement that is actually becoming supported by more information as more people actually investigate Obama's personal history.Woodruff wrote:There is a troll in our fora. Why is that ok with the moderators?Phatscotty wrote:There is a Marxist sitting in the White House. Is that really okay with you?
Actually, it's because they're conducting the misconduct in the first place.Woodruff wrote:Let me get this straight...the fact that "the left leaning media" has been reprimanding and disciplining their reporters for misconduct is somehow a reason why "the left leaning media has lost A LOT of their credibility this year"? That actually makes sense to you?
Irrelevant to US politics because none of it took place in the US (or was in any way related to the US).Symmetry wrote:Conservative Leaning: Systematic phone hacking, bribery, blackmail, interfering with police investigations, lying to police and government investigators, corrupt monopoly practices...
Well, at least Phatscotty has the one other guy in these fora that calls Obama a Marxist on his side...Night Strike wrote:Where's the trolling? Phatscotty made an evaluative statement that is actually becoming supported by more information as more people actually investigate Obama's personal history.Woodruff wrote:There is a troll in our fora. Why is that ok with the moderators?Phatscotty wrote:There is a Marxist sitting in the White House. Is that really okay with you?
That's precisely the point you're not getting..."the left leaning media" isn't conducting misconduct. Individual reporters are conducting misconduct. The "left leaning media" is punishing those who are committing the misconduct. That's like blaming the police for arresting a criminal.Night Strike wrote:Actually, it's because they're conducting the misconduct in the first place.Woodruff wrote:Let me get this straight...the fact that "the left leaning media" has been reprimanding and disciplining their reporters for misconduct is somehow a reason why "the left leaning media has lost A LOT of their credibility this year"? That actually makes sense to you?
Somehow, I suspect that if a Soros organization was doing this sort of stuff overseas, it would suddenly be relevant to you...Night Strike wrote:Irrelevant to US politics because none of it took place in the US (or was in any way related to the US).Symmetry wrote:Conservative Leaning: Systematic phone hacking, bribery, blackmail, interfering with police investigations, lying to police and government investigators, corrupt monopoly practices...