MR. Nate, sounds like the logic that got it illegalised in the first place.
If its legal then the dealers are left out of the loop, your scenario is one that the government created(absurd that it is)
If there is no after,and this is all that we have(life) then we have created a nightmare of a world for ourselves, for if this is all we will ever know, then its about time we started to make this a place worth living in, not just surviving through.
First thing I would elect to get rid of is passports, let us go where we wish!
I'm not very interested in the legelisation of drugs argument. My point is that very few things truly "don't hurt others" because even buying something a Walmart supports an organization that has a bad human rights history. So if you're really interested in not hurting other people, you need to pay a LOT of attention, and be VERY careful what you do.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
However I think in order to prevent that we need to completely rebuild our system.(church, state,and media) I highly doubt that anyones hands are clean anymore. After all, our money is dirty.
Nate I don't oppose the "supporting a dealer is bad" thing but, as you started to point out you'll need to go to a commune and avoid all fiscal transactions to put a stop to it. That might be a good idea but pretty much imposible for most people.
westminster_Shorter_Catechism's wrote:Q16: Did all mankind fall in Adam's first transgression? A16: The covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his posterity; all mankind, descending from him by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him, in his first transgression.
Q17: Into what estate did the fall bring mankind? A17: The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and misery.
hmmm, a bit sketchy there pal....
Q1: What is the chief end of man? A1: Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy Him for ever.
I'd prefer to spend my life enjoying trish stratus's curvy ass, or a nice pint of stella,.....but each for thier own...
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
jnd94 wrote:Probably the hardest question ever to answer. Please, I hope we can have an educated discussion, and not a bunch of ppl sayin "sex", "gettin high", and "potatoes". What do ppl think?
if people knew the answer, I would be very interested
Veni I came
Vidi I saw
Vici I conquered
Caesar
La garde recule. Sauve qui peut! The guard retreats. Save yourself if you can!
Napolean's troops at Waterloo
Which will happen to you?
Aimless wrote:The point of life is, obviously, more life. Love, sex, and video game, without all the love or the video games.
And, as trite as that answer is, it's also serious. Life is a self-replicating phenomenon. Obviously, the better it is at self-replicating, the longer it is going to last. Therefore, after only a few hundred generations, the only goal of any surviving strain of creature is to ensure that its strain does not die out. Any strain for which this is not the goal will die.
i agree reproduction
Veni I came
Vidi I saw
Vici I conquered
Caesar
La garde recule. Sauve qui peut! The guard retreats. Save yourself if you can!
Napolean's troops at Waterloo
Which will happen to you?
2dimes wrote:No, don't do it. If you dig a hole you might harm the underground insects. To become a budha you must avoid harming all life.
Veni I came
Vidi I saw
Vici I conquered
Caesar
La garde recule. Sauve qui peut! The guard retreats. Save yourself if you can!
Napolean's troops at Waterloo
Which will happen to you?
Anarchist wrote:MR. Nate, sounds like the logic that got it illegalised in the first place. If its legal then the dealers are left out of the loop, your scenario is one that the government created(absurd that it is)
If there is no after,and this is all that we have(life) then we have created a nightmare of a world for ourselves, for if this is all we will ever know, then its about time we started to make this a place worth living in, not just surviving through.
First thing I would elect to get rid of is passports, let us go where we wish!
truly an anarchist
Veni I came
Vidi I saw
Vici I conquered
Caesar
La garde recule. Sauve qui peut! The guard retreats. Save yourself if you can!
Napolean's troops at Waterloo
Which will happen to you?
westminster_Shorter_Catechism's wrote:Q16: Did all mankind fall in Adam's first transgression? A16: The covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his posterity; all mankind, descending from him by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him, in his first transgression.
Q17: Into what estate did the fall bring mankind? A17: The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and misery.
hmmm, a bit sketchy there pal....
Q1: What is the chief end of man? A1: Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy Him for ever.
I'd prefer to spend my life enjoying trish stratus's curvy ass, or a nice pint of stella,.....but each for thier own...
I SAID that I didn't think I'd get much agreement.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
Fircoal wrote:The point of life is to live. Do what you can, that's legal, be happy. IT's really to be happy, and a good person.
I'd have to disagree with you there. I think that as long as it doesn't hurt others, then go ahead.
That's pretty broad. A lot of things that "Don't hurt others" have negative results that end up hurting others. For instance, smoking pot in your basement by yourself may not hurt others, except the money you spent to buy it went to support a dealer somewhere, and it allowed him to give crack to a 14 for free (to get them hooked) and you contributed to the man who ruined their life.
Did that hurt someone?
Giving money to dope pleadlers is the same to me as walking up to same 14-year old and shooting them in the head. Or smothering them in their sleep with their own pillow. Those who would argue the reverse are sick in the head.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark
"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
Jenos Ridan wrote:Giving money to dope pleadlers is the same to me as walking up to same 14-year old and shooting them in the head. Or smothering them in their sleep with their own pillow. Those who would argue the reverse are sick in the head.
They sure are Jenos, they sure are.....
Anybody who didn't agree with that would have to lack all powers of logical reasoning and analysis, and would probably be a reactionary sensationalist conservative who wasn't thinking about what he was typing.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Anarchist wrote:LOL, I hope your right (im agreed)
I second that notion. Life must have a point, and some intrisic meaning. If our collective purpose is solely to continue the bio-chemical chain-reaction of life, then why bother pretending that we have minds? If that is the purpose, then our thoughts, memories and emotions, the things that make us who and what we really are, are nothing more than electro-chemical impulses being produced, traveling through and then being stored in eight pounds of cold, soggy tissue in reaction to stimuli. Honestly, what meaning is there in that? [/i]
"nothing more than"?
Speaking as an atheist here, obviously:
Your thoughts, memories and emotions - your consciousness - is the most wonderful, mysterious, complex phenomenon in existence, as far as we know. No scientist or philospoher has really explained it yet. And yes, so far it appears to be the product of electro-chemical impulses firing through grey matter. Your question sounds fearful (i know you didn't mean it that way but it got me thinking). It can't be the truth because, then what? How about imbuing your own life with your own meaning? Make it nothing but reproduction if you want, and you'll have a great time, but if you want to change things or help people then do that instead.
Anarchist wrote:LOL, I hope your right (im agreed)
I second that notion. Life must have a point, and some intrisic meaning. If our collective purpose is solely to continue the bio-chemical chain-reaction of life, then why bother pretending that we have minds? If that is the purpose, then our thoughts, memories and emotions, the things that make us who and what we really are, are nothing more than electro-chemical impulses being produced, traveling through and then being stored in eight pounds of cold, soggy tissue in reaction to stimuli. Honestly, what meaning is there in that? [/i]
"nothing more than"?
Speaking as an atheist here, obviously: Your thoughts, memories and emotions - your consciousness - is the most wonderful, mysterious, complex phenomenon in existence, as far as we know. No scientist or philospoher has really explained it yet. And yes, so far it appears to be the product of electro-chemical impulses firing through grey matter. Your question sounds fearful (i know you didn't mean it that way but it got me thinking). It can't be the truth because, then what? How about imbuing your own life with your own meaning? Make it nothing but reproduction if you want, and you'll have a great time, but if you want to change things or help people then do that instead.
bolded for one of the more underrated obvious truths around.
Jenos Ridan wrote:Giving money to dope pleadlers is the same to me as walking up to same 14-year old and shooting them in the head. Or smothering them in their sleep with their own pillow. Those who would argue the reverse are sick in the head.
They sure are Jenos, they sure are.....
Anybody who didn't agree with that would have to lack all powers of logical reasoning and analysis, and would probably be a reactionary sensationalist conservative who wasn't thinking about what he was typing.
This episode reminds me of "Reefer madness"
Instead of the kid being so high he shoots himself, hes running around killing 14 year olds after smoking pot Thank god we have the government to save us from this "Mexican killer weed" Can we bring out the quote comparing Cannabis to Frankenstein?