Circumcision

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:50 pm

Pardon my ignorance on this topic. I was circumcised at birth, I had no say in this matter. So what you guys are saying about that whole nerve-ending, pleasure stuff is that I can waste out my head pleasure-receptors? I read somewhere in this thread that you waste out everything so that sex doesn't feel as good. Is this true?

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:53 pm

jnd94 wrote:Pardon my ignorance on this topic. I was circumcised at birth, I had no say in this matter. So what you guys are saying about that whole nerve-ending, pleasure stuff is that I can waste out my head pleasure-receptors? I read somewhere in this thread that you waste out everything so that sex doesn't feel as good. Is this true?

Your foreskin has a lot of nerve endings in it, so it does double duty as another pleasure receptor as well as protecting your glans (head) of your penis (it does other things, but let's not talk about those). Once you remove the foreskin, you just removed a lot of nerves and your head is no longer protected. Since it's SUPPOSED to be protected by the foreskin, it wasn't designed to withstand elements, and thus dries out so it can, resulting in more loss of feeling. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you though...

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:56 pm

hecter wrote:
jnd94 wrote:Pardon my ignorance on this topic. I was circumcised at birth, I had no say in this matter. So what you guys are saying about that whole nerve-ending, pleasure stuff is that I can waste out my head pleasure-receptors? I read somewhere in this thread that you waste out everything so that sex doesn't feel as good. Is this true?

Your foreskin has a lot of nerve endings in it, so it does double duty as another pleasure receptor as well as protecting your glans (head) of your penis (it does other things, but let's not talk about those). Once you remove the foreskin, you just removed a lot of nerves and your head is no longer protected. Since it's SUPPOSED to be protected by the foreskin, it wasn't designed to withstand elements, and thus dries out so it can, resulting in more loss of feeling. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you though...

Alright, good :lol:

i was trying the whole day not to have my dick touch my underwear, just in case. Might as well save as much as I got left!

bellaraphon · Post by **bellaraphon** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:57 pm

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:42 pm

well, as for the pain thing, i don't think that should be particularly thought about. sure, it causes great pain for the baby, but i don't think anyone here has trauma or even faint, misty memories of when the man in white hacked off part of my member.

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:53 am

Hitman079 wrote:i don't think anyone here has trauma or even faint, misty memories of when the man in white hacked off part of my member.

I can't speak for everyone, but I certainly have no memories of your circumcision.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:27 am

sully800 wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:i don't think anyone here has trauma or even faint, misty memories of when the man in white hacked off part of my member.

I can't speak for everyone, but I certainly have no memories of your circumcision.

That was pretty funny...

browng-08 · Post by **browng-08** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:29 am

sully800 wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:i don't think anyone here has trauma or even faint, misty memories of when the man in white hacked off part of my member.

I can't speak for everyone, but I certainly have no memories of your circumcision.

lmao

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:36 am

For all you ladies out there :

Having a circumised penis is much cleaner and you have less chance of getting nasty diseases! So hell yeah go circumised and suck on the lolly pop

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:38 am

hulmey wrote:For all you ladies out there :

Having a circumised penis is much cleaner and you have less chance of getting nasty diseases! So hell yeah go circumised and suck on the lolly pop

And the negativity. Less pleasure!

browng-08 · Post by **browng-08** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:41 am

hulmey wrote:For all you ladies out there :

Having a circumised penis is much cleaner and you have less chance of getting nasty diseases! So hell yeah go circumised and suck on the lolly pop

That depends on method of circumcision. In the method where the Rabbi uses his mouth to remove the foreskin there is a chance of getting std's right in the procedure! (read this in MacLean's sometime, in an article about PCism and religious rights btw)

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:52 am

hulmey wrote:For all you ladies out there :

Having a circumised penis is much cleaner and you have less chance of getting nasty diseases! So hell yeah go circumised and suck on the lolly pop

The only way the a circumcised penis is "much cleaner" is if you never bathe. And the diseases is only "proven" for AIDS, and that's for transition to males, not to females. Besides, you asked them to "suck on the lolly pop", and the chance of getting AIDS from oral sex is very low.

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:25 am

Hitman079 wrote:well, as for the pain thing, i don't think that should be particularly thought about. sure, it causes great pain for the baby, but i don't think anyone here has trauma or even faint, misty memories of when the man in white hacked off part of my member.

No you're right... we shouldn't think about it at all.

By that logic (if I ever had a child) it'd be fine for me to commission a cocaine-addled chimpanzee to pluck out one of the child's eyes with a pair of oversized rusty tweezers a week after its birth... after all, the baby isn't going to remember it, so that makes it ok, right?

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:27 am

Circumcision stops you ejaculating really quickly.

clapper011 · Post by **clapper011** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:53 am

I am not sure on this one....both my boys are not circumcised..but my baby will have to be since he has a condition called hypospadeus (sp) this is where the foreskin does not grow properly,and the urethra has grown in the wrong spot, because i never circumcised him ,there is a 90% fix rate for him.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:25 am

jiminski wrote:Circumcision stops you ejaculating really quickly.

Yep. Every uncircumcised person, including myself, ejaculates approximately 3.5 seconds after even thinking about sex.

Ahh... there we go...

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:29 am

Guiscard wrote:
jiminski wrote:Circumcision stops you ejaculating really quickly.

Yep. Every uncircumcised person, including myself, ejaculates approximately 3.5 seconds after even thinking about sex.

Ahh... there we go...

sandpaper and alcohol can help!

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:40 am

To add a balanced and tolerant opinion to the discussion: routine circumcision without a medical reason is stone age barbarism.

You're welcome

HungrySomali · Post by **HungrySomali** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:43 am

hecter wrote:
jnd94 wrote:Pardon my ignorance on this topic. I was circumcised at birth, I had no say in this matter. So what you guys are saying about that whole nerve-ending, pleasure stuff is that I can waste out my head pleasure-receptors? I read somewhere in this thread that you waste out everything so that sex doesn't feel as good. Is this true?

Your foreskin has a lot of nerve endings in it, so it does double duty as another pleasure receptor as well as protecting your glans (head) of your penis (it does other things, but let's not talk about those). Once you remove the foreskin, you just removed a lot of nerves and your head is no longer protected. Since it's SUPPOSED to be protected by the foreskin, it wasn't designed to withstand elements, and thus dries out so it can, resulting in more loss of feeling. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you though...

So youre saying that elephant trunks are perpetually moist with pee or sweat or whatever other ghastly bodily fluid might be hangin around down there?

Thats gotta smell pretty cheesy, I dont care how often you "clean" it. Foul.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:54 am

Koesen wrote:To add a balanced and tolerant opinion to the discussion: routine circumcision without a medical reason is stone age barbarism.

You're welcome

I would not personally circumcise my child without a medical reason but it does, in all seriousness, prolong sex and makes it generally more pleasurable for the female.. ladies can take a little longer.

Neoteny · Post by **Neoteny** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:55 pm

jiminski wrote:
Koesen wrote:To add a balanced and tolerant opinion to the discussion: routine circumcision without a medical reason is stone age barbarism.

You're welcome

I would not personally circumcise my child without a medical reason but it does, in all seriousness, prolong sex and makes it generally more pleasurable for the female.. ladies can take a little longer.

Are you implying that we circumsized individuals are a bit jumpy in the sack? I resent that.

heavycola · Post by **heavycola** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:57 pm

jiminski wrote:
Koesen wrote:To add a balanced and tolerant opinion to the discussion: routine circumcision without a medical reason is stone age barbarism.

You're welcome

I would not personally circumcise my child without a medical reason

Who needs a medical reason? All you really need is a razor blade and a steady hand. Napkins are useful too.

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:26 pm

jiminski wrote:I would not personally circumcise my child without a medical reason but it does, in all seriousness, prolong sex and makes it generally more pleasurable for the female.. ladies can take a little longer.

Do you have a source for that? My GP is starting to get pretty pissed about how long I've had him on hold for.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:35 pm

Dancing Mustard wrote:
jiminski wrote:I would not personally circumcise my child without a medical reason but it does, in all seriousness, prolong sex and makes it generally more pleasurable for the female.. ladies can take a little longer.

Do you have a source for that? My GP is starting to get pretty pissed about how long I've had him on hold for.

Lindsay Beyerstein Says:
October 30, 2006 at 7:15 pm

No, circumcision doesn’t contribute to premature ejaculation. In fact, if anything, circumcised men may last slightly longer, on average:

Waldinger MD. A multinational population survey of intravaginal ejaculation latency time. J Sex Med. 2005 Jul;2(4):492-7.

Fieryo · Post by **Fieryo** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:01 pm

Koesen wrote:To add a balanced and tolerant opinion to the discussion: routine circumcision without a medical reason is stone age barbarism.

You're welcome

I think someone's a little jealous of the cut men out there. :wink:

Circumcision

Would you have your male child circumcised?