Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
General Quigley wrote:To Klobber -- I feel for you, dude. It's no fun being a victim of a site admin who is entrusted by the site who then abuses her authority, is it?
To Wicked -- So, apparently how you play the game doesn't matter, only winning, hey? It's a philosophy some subscribe to, and which apparently GoVegan does. I don't respect it and am glad I live in a country (unlike say Nazi Germany or Taliban controlled territory) where the dominant philosphy is that the ends don't always justify the means. The "I was wearing my player hat, not my moderator hat" argument is a poor one. I retired from the military. We were held accountable for our actions, all of them, whether on- or off-duty. Drink and drive off duty? You get hammered by civilians and the military justice system, both. get an assault charge in a bar, swindle civilians out of money, or even more than a few speeding tickets, same deal. Civilians only get the hammer once. You don't give the military a bad name and you're held accountable for your conduct 24/7/365. People in positions of any kind of authority (policemen, teachers, sports figure role models, even game site admins, whatever) don't get to hide behind that silly, naive, different roles argument. You give Conquer Club itself a bad name by your behavior when you fail to uphold a standard of fairness because you represent Conquer Club administration. I suggest you grow up and face the fact you have assumed a responsibility, however miniscule in overall significance it may be.
To the others -- So, basically most of you are saying Wicked and her unsportsmanlike behavior is okay bececause it's okay. It's what happens at this site. That's sort of like the someone in the Confederate States of America saying slavery is okay because that's what we do and have always done here. It's the law of the land. Well, I disagree with that thinking. Slavery is simply wrong on the face of it. Unsportsmanlike behavior (using secret advantages your opponent clearly has no intention of using or awareness that you are using or would use until too late, and seeking out such opponents for ambushing this way) is wrong too. Conquer Club would be a better place if it didn't sanction and reward (by a still too high ratings points conferral) such unsportsmanlike behavior, though I fully realize I can't change it. My choice is whether or not to accept it, or to vote with my feet as so many others have done before me.
General Quigley

This isn't the military, it's a game, that comparison is pointless. AND, on top of that, the OWNER of the site has already laid down the rule that the members of the staff get to be players first and that we should be treated as such within our games. End of story.General Quigley wrote:The "I was wearing my player hat, not my moderator hat" argument is a poor one. I retired from the military. We were held accountable for our actions, all of them, whether on- or off-duty. Drink and drive off duty? You get hammered by civilians and the military justice system, both. get an assault charge in a bar, swindle civilians out of money, or even more than a few speeding tickets, same deal. Civilians only get the hammer once. You don't give the military a bad name and you're held accountable for your conduct 24/7/365. People in positions of any kind of authority (policemen, teachers, sports figure role models, even game site admins, whatever) don't get to hide behind that silly, naive, different roles argument.
They didn't do anything unsportsmanlike, unless you count beating you as unsportsmanlike.To the others -- So, basically most of you are saying Wicked and her unsportsmanlike behavior is okay because it's okay. It's what happens at this site. That's sort of like the someone in the Confederate States of America saying slavery is okay because that's what we do and have always done here. It's the law of the land. Well, I disagree with that thinking. Slavery is simply wrong on the face of it. Unsportsmanlike behavior (using secret advantages your opponent clearly has no intention of using or awareness that you are using or would use until too late, and seeking out such opponents for ambushing this way) is wrong too. Conquer Club would be a better place if it didn't sanction and reward (by a still too high ratings points conferral) such unsportsmanlike behavior, though I fully realize I can't change it. My choice is whether or not to accept it, or to vote with my feet as so many others have done before me.

Anyone know a really strong brand of disinfectant?wicked wrote:Oh Klobs, you're one of a kind. *kiss*

KLOBBER wrote:Anyone know a really strong brand of disinfectant?wicked wrote:Oh Klobs, you're one of a kind. *kiss*

Aptly named, but misspelled.jiminski wrote:KLOBBER wrote:Anyone know a really strong brand of disinfectant?wicked wrote:Oh Klobs, you're one of a kind. *kiss*
This was one of the most well-written things I have ever read on this site.General Quigley wrote:To Klobber -- I feel for you, dude. It's no fun being a victim of a site admin who is entrusted by the site who then abuses her authority, is it?
To Wicked -- So, apparently how you play the game doesn't matter, only winning, hey? It's a philosophy some subscribe to, and which apparently GoVegan does. I don't respect it and am glad I live in a country (unlike say Nazi Germany or Taliban controlled territory) where the dominant philosphy is that the ends don't always justify the means. The "I was wearing my player hat, not my moderator hat" argument is a poor one. I retired from the military. We were held accountable for our actions, all of them, whether on- or off-duty. Drink and drive off duty? You get hammered by civilians and the military justice system, both. get an assault charge in a bar, swindle civilians out of money, or even more than a few speeding tickets, same deal. Civilians only get the hammer once. You don't give the military a bad name and you're held accountable for your conduct 24/7/365. People in positions of any kind of authority (policemen, teachers, sports figure role models, even game site admins, whatever) don't get to hide behind that silly, naive, different roles argument. You give Conquer Club itself a bad name by your behavior when you fail to uphold a standard of fairness because you represent Conquer Club administration. I suggest you grow up and face the fact you have assumed a responsibility, however miniscule in overall significance it may be.
To the others -- So, basically most of you are saying Wicked and her unsportsmanlike behavior is okay bececause it's okay. It's what happens at this site. That's sort of like the someone in the Confederate States of America saying slavery is okay because that's what we do and have always done here. It's the law of the land. Well, I disagree with that thinking. Slavery is simply wrong on the face of it. Unsportsmanlike behavior (using secret advantages your opponent clearly has no intention of using or awareness that you are using or would use until too late, and seeking out such opponents for ambushing this way) is wrong too. Conquer Club would be a better place if it didn't sanction and reward (by a still too high ratings points conferral) such unsportsmanlike behavior, though I fully realize I can't change it. My choice is whether or not to accept it, or to vote with my feet as so many others have done before me.
General Quigley
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.