You could slide into home by adding: "the debate is over".Neoteny wrote:Just to cover the bases: Stoneham is a bigot and an ignorant racist.
Moderator: Community Team
You could slide into home by adding: "the debate is over".Neoteny wrote:Just to cover the bases: Stoneham is a bigot and an ignorant racist.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
That is certainly fucking debatable. It's interesting earlier you said something about the North American Indian's having a 'liberal' stance on immigration (in terms of the Europeans) - more like they got murdered and had the lands that they lived on taken over. I have no comprehension how caucasians who are not living in Europe can not understand how hypocritical your views on immigration are.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:... this country was built on legal immigration
Holy shit! Another straw man deal!radiojake wrote:That is certainly fucking debatable. It's interesting earlier you said something about the North American Indian's having a 'liberal' stance on immigration (in terms of the Europeans) - more like they got murdered and had the lands that they lived on taken over. I have no comprehension how caucasians who are not living in Europe can not understand how hypocritical your views on immigration are.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:... this country was built on legal immigration
white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate)oVo wrote:extracted from the "Native American" thread...GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Today America is once again being flooded by illegal aliens, but this time from South of the border. So, the Hispanics will over-populate the WHITES, BLACKS and ASIANS and take control of the USA. We'll become part of Mexico and be herded into reservations.
.radiojake wrote:That is certainly fucking debatable. It's interesting earlier you said something about the North American Indian's having a 'liberal' stance on immigration (in terms of the Europeans) - more like they got murdered and had the lands that they lived on taken over. I have no comprehension how caucasians who are not living in Europe can not understand how hypocritical your views on immigration are.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:... this country was built on legal immigration
No, I was pretty clear... in the 80's and 90's. According to my calander, its now 2009. Of course, those that came did not necessarily leave, though NOW some are.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Player believes that we have a shortage of workers. Really now, with unemployment approaching 10 percent, you need a reality check.
More than you, apparently, they contributed.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:U.S. and World Bank policy is why Mexico is a corrupt society?!?! My GOD Player, you don't know a thing about Mexico do you?
At least we'd then be able to compete better in the world market.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
Dial 1 for ENGLISH
Dial 2 for SPANISH
Dial 3 for Mandarin
Dial 4 for Kenyan
Dial 5 for Malaysian
Dial 6 for Romanian
Dial 7 for Russian
Dial 8 for Polish
Dial 9 for Nigerian
Heck, I guess we'll need to come up with some more numbers for our phones and be very patient at that.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: I'm a naturalized citizen [which means I'm not born in this country] My Mother had to go through a complete background check, unlike illegal aliens.
Well at the moment the Federal Government have undertaken an 'intervention' in the red centre of Australia - they've taken over running of the communities (on the botched premise of sexual abuse) and now food stamps are the only currency to Aboriginals in the Northern Territory and the north of Western Australia (ofcourse only redeemable at Coles or Woolworths, killing small business). It was only 40 years ago that we stopped taking young Aborignal children away from their families to be brought up by white, christian Australians because it was 'better for the kids' than if they were to stay with their families. Many of these people have never been re-united and have no idea the fate of their family. They are known as the stolen generation. The 230 odd years that Australia has had European occupation, we have killed so many Aboriginals the population is a minute percentage compared white landing. On the island of Tasmania, there are no full blood natives left, for back in the day they had a bounty on their heads.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Tell me my Australian friend, how many Aborigines have you slaughtered lately?
I wouldn't count on blacks going back to Africa.Borderdawg wrote: Hell, right now, we are hoping all the white people go to space, and all the blacks go back to Africa. Any one else, we will adopt into the tribe, or hang their scalps on the lodgepole! "
Take a closer look at the avatar, little friend.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:.thegreekdog wrote:Gen.Stoneham, you sound very much like the anti-immigration people in the US in the late 19th and early 20th century. I certainly hope your ancestors weren't immigrants during that period of time, else you are quite the hypocrit.
.
.
Please save me from your hypocritical "Che" avatar. Especially the way you spout off your capitalist rhetoric.
Never said it wasn't, I just said that the problem is not as Stone framed it and his idea of a solution will just make things worse.Borderdawg wrote:Stoney, Player, you are polar opposites, and both of you are f*cking idiots.
Player, illegal immigration is a problem.
Borderdawg wrote:Children born to illegals DO NOT give the parents the right to stay in this country. They can leave the child in foster care or renounce the child's citizenship and take it with them to their home country.
Well, American Indians certainly have a legitimate gripe (as I have pointed out in other threads). Actually, this was Stoneham's spin off from another topic that did include Native Americans.Borderdawg wrote: And, as an Amerind, I'd like to ask the both of you to leave my people out of your
debate.
Borderdawg wrote:Stoney, Player, you are polar opposites, and both of you are f*cking idiots.
Player, illegal immigration is a problem. Stoney, going only after the illegals is not a solution. We need to hammer the employers, not just with fines, but with prison time for the upper level execs. Player, we also need to deport any illegals caught, no exceptions. Children born to illegals DO NOT give the parents the right to stay in this country. They can leave the child in foster care or renounce the child's citizenship and take it with them to their home country.
And, as an Amerind, I'd like to ask the both of you to leave my people out of your
debate. Speaking for my family, which consists of 4 tribes, we don't much care for any of ya'll. We've killed the French and the English in the northern states, we've killed southern whites prior to the Trail of Tears, and we've killed Mexicans and Blacks in the plains and along the southern border. Hell, right now, we are hoping all the white people go to space, and all the blacks go back to Africa. Any one else, we will adopt into the tribe, or hang their scalps on the lodgepole! "
So, I guess what I would like to say to the both of you is, STFU and GTFO. No one cares what you have to say, and please, make an appointment with Dr. Kevorkian at your earliest convenience! (Or, Stoney, buy a .38 and eat it! And Player, take lots and lots of sleeping pills with a fifth of scotch!)
radiojake wrote:Well at the moment the Federal Government have undertaken an 'intervention' in the red centre of Australia - they've taken over running of the communities (on the botched premise of sexual abuse) and now food stamps are the only currency to Aboriginals in the Northern Territory and the north of Western Australia (ofcourse only redeemable at Coles or Woolworths, killing small business). It was only 40 years ago that we stopped taking young Aborignal children away from their families to be brought up by white, christian Australians because it was 'better for the kids' than if they were to stay with their families. Many of these people have never been re-united and have no idea the fate of their family. They are known as the stolen generation. The 230 odd years that Australia has had European occupation, we have killed so many Aboriginals the population is a minute percentage compared white landing. On the island of Tasmania, there are no full blood natives left, for back in the day they had a bounty on their heads.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Tell me my Australian friend, how many Aborigines have you slaughtered lately?
Also in Australia, we too have a problem with 'illegals' - except we call them 'boat people' - Refugees getting into un-seaworthy ships, getting tricked and ripped off by merciless people smugglers and set sail on a dangerous voyage from Indonesia hoping to make it to the north coast of Australia searching for a better life. The irony of the term 'boat people' lost on a culture that makes folklore of Captain James Cook's ship 'The Endevour' that triumphantly landed in Botany Bay back in 1770. We are boat people too. But I guess because we had the military power it makes it ok.
I want to know what your point was, Stoneham. Being an Australian, I am more than aware of the horrible way we have (and continue to) treat the native folk. How does this justify you ignorant and racist stance against third world humans trying to make a better life for themselves. What the f*ck gives YOU the right to live a life of excessive opulance, while others starve?
Yeah, if anything they're my people! BE PROUD!GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Your people?!?! Now that's funny.
OH SHIT PEOPLE KILLING OTHER PEOPLE?The North American Indians and of course the other tribes in Latin America and South America were real busy killing each other off, before and during the GREAT WHITE immigration to the New World.
Wait...weren't you just basically beign a massive racist and labelling all people from a certain country as criminals?Your people, not really. The tribes are as different as the countries that inhabit the world.
Well good thing you aren't a racist or that post might hav...HOLY f*ck!!???Now be a good Indian and hit the bottle.
YEAH YOU DAMN INJUNS! BETTER BE GLAD OUR PEOPLE PROVIDED YOU WITH DRUGS!! NOW SIT THERE AND BE A QUIET GOOD LITTLE NATIVE BEFORE I LAY THE BELT ON YOU!!At least most of you can get alcohol and cigarettes through your generous welfare checks you receive from Uncle Sam.
Yeah! Those goddamn liberals calling you a racist are just losing the argument!!!GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Of course those people who want to call names like racist and bigots, have lost the argument.
Now be a good Indian and hit the bottle.
After that diatribe, you actually accuse someone else of tripping?GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Your rambling nonsense that you call an argument is probably due to you licking those toads in Australia that have those wonderful trippy qualities.
I didn't say you should starve! Where did I say that? I said why should you (and the rest of the first world, including myself) live in oppulance (because we do) and feel no need to share the wealth. Do you know how much money the US makes off the backs of third world workers to your south? Whatever, you clearly don't understand a fucking thing if you thought i was telling you to go hungry.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
I should starve, cause other people in Third World countries are starving? Why don't YOU go on a hunger strike, so YOU can feel the pain of your brothers in countries suffering from famine. Most of the famine is a direct effect from war and corrupt regimes. But a mental midget like YOU thinks, if I let them FLOOD my country all humankind will be saved.
All those toads are way up in the north in the tropics. I live in Melbourne, very much the opposite of the tropics. No toads to lick here, unfortanatly.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Your rambling nonsense that you call an argument is probably due to you licking those toads in Australia that have those wonderful trippy qualities.
Not to mention that he is a crap CC games player , goodness knows how he ever passed those rigorous and vital immigration testsSnorri1234 wrote:Damn liberals!
Okay stone, you're basically now reported as being a massive racist f*ck.
No, he didn't.. his MOTHER did.joecoolfrog wrote:Not to mention that he is a crap CC games player , goodness knows how he ever passed those rigorous and vital immigration testsSnorri1234 wrote:Damn liberals!
Okay stone, you're basically now reported as being a massive racist f*ck.
I didn't say you should starve! Where did I say that? I said why should you (and the rest of the first world, including myself) live in oppulance (because we do) and feel no need to share the wealth. Do you know how much money the US makes off the backs of third world workers to your south? Whatever, you clearly don't understand a fucking thing if you thought i was telling you to go hungry.radiojake wrote:GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
I should starve, cause other people in Third World countries are starving? Why don't YOU go on a hunger strike, so YOU can feel the pain of your brothers in countries suffering from famine. Most of the famine is a direct effect from war and corrupt regimes. But a mental midget like YOU thinks, if I let them FLOOD my country all humankind will be saved.