GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by HapSmo19 »

Neoteny wrote:Just to cover the bases: Stoneham is a bigot and an ignorant racist.
You could slide into home by adding: "the debate is over".
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by Neoteny »

It is, at least, on the scientific level. Also: Your mom is fat.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
radiojake
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by radiojake »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:... this country was built on legal immigration
That is certainly fucking debatable. It's interesting earlier you said something about the North American Indian's having a 'liberal' stance on immigration (in terms of the Europeans) - more like they got murdered and had the lands that they lived on taken over. I have no comprehension how caucasians who are not living in Europe can not understand how hypocritical your views on immigration are.
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by HapSmo19 »

radiojake wrote:
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:... this country was built on legal immigration
That is certainly fucking debatable. It's interesting earlier you said something about the North American Indian's having a 'liberal' stance on immigration (in terms of the Europeans) - more like they got murdered and had the lands that they lived on taken over. I have no comprehension how caucasians who are not living in Europe can not understand how hypocritical your views on immigration are.
Holy shit! Another straw man deal!
It's actually kinda fun pointing those out aint it?

You take a stance like any U.S. born caucasian(I'm sure it's ok for any other race) that doesn't advocate opening the flood gates was just out killing american natives last week and is therefore a hypocrite and doesn't have a leg to stand on when it comes to having a certain opinion on illegal immigration.

What's the historical cut-off for blaming uncool shit on the people of today?
100 years? 200? 300?
Does it only apply to whitey?

And what the f*ck does an austrailian really know about what's going on on the ground here anyway?
Last edited by HapSmo19 on Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ben79
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:29 pm

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by ben79 »

oVo wrote:extracted from the "Native American" thread...
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Today America is once again being flooded by illegal aliens, but this time from South of the border. So, the Hispanics will over-populate the WHITES, BLACKS and ASIANS and take control of the USA. We'll become part of Mexico and be herded into reservations.
white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate)
note: a separate listing for Hispanic is not included because the US Census Bureau considers Hispanic to mean a person of Latin American descent (including persons of Cuban, Mexican, or Puerto Rican origin) living in the US who may be of any race or ethnic group (white, black, Asian, etc.); about 15.1% of the total US population is Hispanic

that's the most recent stats from the cia about the ethnic groups living in the united states of america, and last year u.s.a. went over the 300 millions population
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by HapSmo19 »

By the way, I am 100% native american.

I mean, majority wise I'm white but I was born here in the U.S.. Europe sure as hell isn't my homeland.

I feel discriminated against every time I have to pay for a fishing license.

Can we get some lawyers on the case?
User avatar
GENERAL STONEHAM
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: EXILED, BANNED and INCARCERATED!
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by GENERAL STONEHAM »

radiojake wrote:
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:... this country was built on legal immigration
That is certainly fucking debatable. It's interesting earlier you said something about the North American Indian's having a 'liberal' stance on immigration (in terms of the Europeans) - more like they got murdered and had the lands that they lived on taken over. I have no comprehension how caucasians who are not living in Europe can not understand how hypocritical your views on immigration are.
.
.
.

Tell me my Australian friend, how many Aborigines have you slaughtered lately?
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by PLAYER57832 »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Player believes that we have a shortage of workers. Really now, with unemployment approaching 10 percent, you need a reality check.
No, I was pretty clear... in the 80's and 90's. According to my calander, its now 2009. Of course, those that came did not necessarily leave, though NOW some are.

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:U.S. and World Bank policy is why Mexico is a corrupt society?!?! My GOD Player, you don't know a thing about Mexico do you?
More than you, apparently, they contributed.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
Dial 1 for ENGLISH

Dial 2 for SPANISH

Dial 3 for Mandarin

Dial 4 for Kenyan

Dial 5 for Malaysian

Dial 6 for Romanian

Dial 7 for Russian

Dial 8 for Polish

Dial 9 for Nigerian

Heck, I guess we'll need to come up with some more numbers for our phones and be very patient at that.
At least we'd then be able to compete better in the world market.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by PLAYER57832 »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: I'm a naturalized citizen [which means I'm not born in this country] My Mother had to go through a complete background check, unlike illegal aliens.


This pretty much explains it ... a common, though sad response of recent immigrants is to turn around and blast everyone else who tries to come.

I got to come... but THEY don't deserve it!

And I definitely noticed that while you were not born here, it was your mother and not you that passed the tests, got the background check, not you.
Borderdawg
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 6:31 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Oklahoma

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by Borderdawg »

Stoney, Player, you are polar opposites, and both of you are f*cking idiots.
Player, illegal immigration is a problem. Stoney, going only after the illegals is not a solution. We need to hammer the employers, not just with fines, but with prison time for the upper level execs. Player, we also need to deport any illegals caught, no exceptions. Children born to illegals DO NOT give the parents the right to stay in this country. They can leave the child in foster care or renounce the child's citizenship and take it with them to their home country.
And, as an Amerind, I'd like to ask the both of you to leave my people out of your
debate. Speaking for my family, which consists of 4 tribes, we don't much care for any of ya'll. We've killed the French and the English in the northern states, we've killed southern whites prior to the Trail of Tears, and we've killed Mexicans and Blacks in the plains and along the southern border. Hell, right now, we are hoping all the white people go to space, and all the blacks go back to Africa. Any one else, we will adopt into the tribe, or hang their scalps on the lodgepole! "
So, I guess what I would like to say to the both of you is, STFU and GTFO. No one cares what you have to say, and please, make an appointment with Dr. Kevorkian at your earliest convenience! (Or, Stoney, buy a .38 and eat it! And Player, take lots and lots of sleeping pills with a fifth of scotch!)
User avatar
b.k. barunt
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by b.k. barunt »

Outstanding post there. Pretty much puts the cap on this discussion i'd say.


Honibaz
User avatar
radiojake
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by radiojake »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Tell me my Australian friend, how many Aborigines have you slaughtered lately?
Well at the moment the Federal Government have undertaken an 'intervention' in the red centre of Australia - they've taken over running of the communities (on the botched premise of sexual abuse) and now food stamps are the only currency to Aboriginals in the Northern Territory and the north of Western Australia (ofcourse only redeemable at Coles or Woolworths, killing small business). It was only 40 years ago that we stopped taking young Aborignal children away from their families to be brought up by white, christian Australians because it was 'better for the kids' than if they were to stay with their families. Many of these people have never been re-united and have no idea the fate of their family. They are known as the stolen generation. The 230 odd years that Australia has had European occupation, we have killed so many Aboriginals the population is a minute percentage compared white landing. On the island of Tasmania, there are no full blood natives left, for back in the day they had a bounty on their heads.

Also in Australia, we too have a problem with 'illegals' - except we call them 'boat people' - Refugees getting into un-seaworthy ships, getting tricked and ripped off by merciless people smugglers and set sail on a dangerous voyage from Indonesia hoping to make it to the north coast of Australia searching for a better life. The irony of the term 'boat people' lost on a culture that makes folklore of Captain James Cook's ship 'The Endevour' that triumphantly landed in Botany Bay back in 1770. We are boat people too. But I guess because we had the military power it makes it ok.


I want to know what your point was, Stoneham. Being an Australian, I am more than aware of the horrible way we have (and continue to) treat the native folk. How does this justify you ignorant and racist stance against third world humans trying to make a better life for themselves. What the f*ck gives YOU the right to live a life of excessive opulance, while others starve?
Last edited by radiojake on Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by HapSmo19 »

Borderdawg wrote: Hell, right now, we are hoping all the white people go to space, and all the blacks go back to Africa. Any one else, we will adopt into the tribe, or hang their scalps on the lodgepole! "
I wouldn't count on blacks going back to Africa.

:D

(I'm an opportunist, not a racist)
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by thegreekdog »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Gen.Stoneham, you sound very much like the anti-immigration people in the US in the late 19th and early 20th century. I certainly hope your ancestors weren't immigrants during that period of time, else you are quite the hypocrit.
.
.
.


Please save me from your hypocritical "Che" avatar. Especially the way you spout off your capitalist rhetoric.
Take a closer look at the avatar, little friend.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Borderdawg wrote:Stoney, Player, you are polar opposites, and both of you are f*cking idiots.
Player, illegal immigration is a problem.
Never said it wasn't, I just said that the problem is not as Stone framed it and his idea of a solution will just make things worse.

It wasn't Mexicans that bombed the trade center. But, if we keep up on this track, its possible it WILL be from that direction next time. THAT is why it behooves us to worry about economic conditions below the border.

Borderdawg wrote:Children born to illegals DO NOT give the parents the right to stay in this country. They can leave the child in foster care or renounce the child's citizenship and take it with them to their home country.


If you suggest foster care as a real alternative, you nknow nothing of the foster care system. A large percentage of criminals were in it.

And they certainly don't have to renounce their child's citizenship to return to their home country. However, we will wind up with a citizen who is likely poorly educated and malnourished besides.

I agree that there needs to be a solution, but I am not sure what it is.
Borderdawg wrote: And, as an Amerind, I'd like to ask the both of you to leave my people out of your
debate.
Well, American Indians certainly have a legitimate gripe (as I have pointed out in other threads). Actually, this was Stoneham's spin off from another topic that did include Native Americans.
User avatar
GENERAL STONEHAM
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: EXILED, BANNED and INCARCERATED!
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by GENERAL STONEHAM »

Borderdawg wrote:Stoney, Player, you are polar opposites, and both of you are f*cking idiots.
Player, illegal immigration is a problem. Stoney, going only after the illegals is not a solution. We need to hammer the employers, not just with fines, but with prison time for the upper level execs. Player, we also need to deport any illegals caught, no exceptions. Children born to illegals DO NOT give the parents the right to stay in this country. They can leave the child in foster care or renounce the child's citizenship and take it with them to their home country.
And, as an Amerind, I'd like to ask the both of you to leave my people out of your
debate. Speaking for my family, which consists of 4 tribes, we don't much care for any of ya'll. We've killed the French and the English in the northern states, we've killed southern whites prior to the Trail of Tears, and we've killed Mexicans and Blacks in the plains and along the southern border. Hell, right now, we are hoping all the white people go to space, and all the blacks go back to Africa. Any one else, we will adopt into the tribe, or hang their scalps on the lodgepole! "
So, I guess what I would like to say to the both of you is, STFU and GTFO. No one cares what you have to say, and please, make an appointment with Dr. Kevorkian at your earliest convenience! (Or, Stoney, buy a .38 and eat it! And Player, take lots and lots of sleeping pills with a fifth of scotch!)


Your people?!?! Now that's funny. The North American Indians and of course the other tribes in Latin America and South America were real busy killing each other off, before and during the GREAT WHITE immigration to the New World.

Your people, not really. The tribes are as different as the countries that inhabit the world.

Now be a good Indian and hit the bottle. At least most of you can get alcohol and cigarettes through your generous welfare checks you receive from Uncle Sam.
User avatar
GENERAL STONEHAM
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: EXILED, BANNED and INCARCERATED!
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by GENERAL STONEHAM »

radiojake wrote:
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Tell me my Australian friend, how many Aborigines have you slaughtered lately?
Well at the moment the Federal Government have undertaken an 'intervention' in the red centre of Australia - they've taken over running of the communities (on the botched premise of sexual abuse) and now food stamps are the only currency to Aboriginals in the Northern Territory and the north of Western Australia (ofcourse only redeemable at Coles or Woolworths, killing small business). It was only 40 years ago that we stopped taking young Aborignal children away from their families to be brought up by white, christian Australians because it was 'better for the kids' than if they were to stay with their families. Many of these people have never been re-united and have no idea the fate of their family. They are known as the stolen generation. The 230 odd years that Australia has had European occupation, we have killed so many Aboriginals the population is a minute percentage compared white landing. On the island of Tasmania, there are no full blood natives left, for back in the day they had a bounty on their heads.

Also in Australia, we too have a problem with 'illegals' - except we call them 'boat people' - Refugees getting into un-seaworthy ships, getting tricked and ripped off by merciless people smugglers and set sail on a dangerous voyage from Indonesia hoping to make it to the north coast of Australia searching for a better life. The irony of the term 'boat people' lost on a culture that makes folklore of Captain James Cook's ship 'The Endevour' that triumphantly landed in Botany Bay back in 1770. We are boat people too. But I guess because we had the military power it makes it ok.


I want to know what your point was, Stoneham. Being an Australian, I am more than aware of the horrible way we have (and continue to) treat the native folk. How does this justify you ignorant and racist stance against third world humans trying to make a better life for themselves. What the f*ck gives YOU the right to live a life of excessive opulance, while others starve?


I should starve, cause other people in Third World countries are starving? Why don't YOU go on a hunger strike, so YOU can feel the pain of your brothers in countries suffering from famine. Most of the famine is a direct effect from war and corrupt regimes. But a mental midget like YOU thinks, if I let them FLOOD my country all humankind will be saved.

Now back to the issue of "native people," I have no hatred for American Indians, as long as they have legal residency and/or American citizenship. All other Indians from other New World locations need to go through our immigration process. Plain and simple.

Of course those people who want to call names like racist and bigots, have lost the argument.

Your rambling nonsense that you call an argument is probably due to you licking those toads in Australia that have those wonderful trippy qualities.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by Snorri1234 »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Your people?!?! Now that's funny.
Yeah, if anything they're my people! BE PROUD!
The North American Indians and of course the other tribes in Latin America and South America were real busy killing each other off, before and during the GREAT WHITE immigration to the New World.
OH SHIT PEOPLE KILLING OTHER PEOPLE?

Well I guess it's allright to slaughter all of them then.
Your people, not really. The tribes are as different as the countries that inhabit the world.
Wait...weren't you just basically beign a massive racist and labelling all people from a certain country as criminals?
Now be a good Indian and hit the bottle.
Well good thing you aren't a racist or that post might hav...HOLY f*ck!!???
At least most of you can get alcohol and cigarettes through your generous welfare checks you receive from Uncle Sam.
YEAH YOU DAMN INJUNS! BETTER BE GLAD OUR PEOPLE PROVIDED YOU WITH DRUGS!! NOW SIT THERE AND BE A QUIET GOOD LITTLE NATIVE BEFORE I LAY THE BELT ON YOU!!

Holy shit. Holy shit! You're just an incredible racist dude.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by Snorri1234 »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Of course those people who want to call names like racist and bigots, have lost the argument.
Yeah! Those goddamn liberals calling you a racist are just losing the argument!!!


Wait...:
Now be a good Indian and hit the bottle.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by Snorri1234 »

Damn liberals!


Okay stone, you're basically now reported as being a massive racist f*ck.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by PLAYER57832 »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Your rambling nonsense that you call an argument is probably due to you licking those toads in Australia that have those wonderful trippy qualities.
After that diatribe, you actually accuse someone else of tripping? :roll:
User avatar
radiojake
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by radiojake »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:

I should starve, cause other people in Third World countries are starving? Why don't YOU go on a hunger strike, so YOU can feel the pain of your brothers in countries suffering from famine. Most of the famine is a direct effect from war and corrupt regimes. But a mental midget like YOU thinks, if I let them FLOOD my country all humankind will be saved.
I didn't say you should starve! Where did I say that? I said why should you (and the rest of the first world, including myself) live in oppulance (because we do) and feel no need to share the wealth. Do you know how much money the US makes off the backs of third world workers to your south? Whatever, you clearly don't understand a fucking thing if you thought i was telling you to go hungry.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote: Your rambling nonsense that you call an argument is probably due to you licking those toads in Australia that have those wonderful trippy qualities.
All those toads are way up in the north in the tropics. I live in Melbourne, very much the opposite of the tropics. No toads to lick here, unfortanatly.
-- share what ya got --
joecoolfrog
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Gender: Male
Location: London ponds

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by joecoolfrog »

Snorri1234 wrote:Damn liberals!


Okay stone, you're basically now reported as being a massive racist f*ck.
Not to mention that he is a crap CC games player , goodness knows how he ever passed those rigorous and vital immigration tests :lol:
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by PLAYER57832 »

joecoolfrog wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Damn liberals!


Okay stone, you're basically now reported as being a massive racist f*ck.
Not to mention that he is a crap CC games player , goodness knows how he ever passed those rigorous and vital immigration tests :lol:
No, he didn't.. his MOTHER did.
User avatar
GENERAL STONEHAM
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: EXILED, BANNED and INCARCERATED!
Contact:

Re: GEN.STONEHAM's love of immigrants

Post by GENERAL STONEHAM »

radiojake wrote:
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:

I should starve, cause other people in Third World countries are starving? Why don't YOU go on a hunger strike, so YOU can feel the pain of your brothers in countries suffering from famine. Most of the famine is a direct effect from war and corrupt regimes. But a mental midget like YOU thinks, if I let them FLOOD my country all humankind will be saved.
I didn't say you should starve! Where did I say that? I said why should you (and the rest of the first world, including myself) live in oppulance (because we do) and feel no need to share the wealth. Do you know how much money the US makes off the backs of third world workers to your south? Whatever, you clearly don't understand a fucking thing if you thought i was telling you to go hungry.


Listen up my Australian friend, your economic theory about how much money we make off the backs of Third World workers is a crock of shit. WE the AMERICAN worker are harmed by cheap Third World workers, you fucking idiot! We can't compete against Chinese, Indian, Indonesian countries that don't have to worry about paying their workers a decent wage, benefits and don't have to worry about polluting their enviroment.

As far as sharing our wealth, the U.S. is on the verge of bankruptcy. At least you fucking Australians and Europeans benefit from our nuclear and military umbrella. At least you boys and girls should do more to protect your own freedom, so maybe we can spend more on our own poor Americans in America.

Selfish Euro-Trash!
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”