New Jedi Order Mafia MOZ & VONG WIN

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:28 pm

A big Good morning for day 2

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:29 pm

Or scum. Well, diplomat is a bit vague, I'm not too sure it's a recruiter role.

Concerning the lynch choice, well I stand by my point of day 1, even if I could find allusions to fake claims in Mandy's posts I don't think Exile could have popped up with that out of so little. About Moz, well the fact he tried to hammer Ak without telling us anything doesn't speak much for him IMO.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:43 pm

I'm guessing a trigger happy vig might have hit LSU. Iceman did mention him alongisde Koesen as one of the lists of suspects. The lightsabre and LSU's submarining collaborates with this evidence. Then again, if it was a vig they certainly did make the wisest choice in terms of their decision as there are a number of greater suspects in my opinion.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:40 pm

VOTE COUNT

Exile(2) - Wicked, nagerus

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:13 pm

man that ws a lot of reading to catch up in this game. there were some benefits to it though. knowing that AK was good and Koesen was scum made some of the posts more revealling. Specifically Koesens post on who he trusted. Knowing he was in the duel and there was a 50% chance he would die that day he posted this:

Koesen wrote:I think AK essentially gave us dozens of pages of nothing yesterday, with a couple of pro town roleclaims that may end up hurting us. Can we take his word for anything now?

Then there's Moz with his weird and not very necessary roleclaim. How big are the odds he discovers the true identity of the one guy he gets a hunch on?

Then there's Exile, who may have slipped up with his jedi remark, although given that his original accusation comes from AK, I'm not sure how meaningful that is.

Wicked and Anark, I now tend to trust (though I'm not sure), and the same goes for Fircoal (as much as it pains me to say that, hehe).

Nagerous hints at being pro town too, and I tend to believe him, inspite of his continuing suspicions of me. I guess you suspect me for not being sure if either of the duelists is on my side. That remark was based on the fact that there are several jedi knights in the Star Wars Saga who go over to the dark side. Force does not equal Good in the Star Wars stories (Darth Vader, Palpatine, Darth Maul, Count Dooku) and I would not be surprised if a similar twist awaits us here.

Anybody else I had thoughts on, I forgot them, hehe.

here's my question, to those who have played w/ him more. Is he a hide in plain sight kind of fellow or reverse psychology? ie Knowing that he might die and be outed does he post a list of those he would want taken out (not scum). OR would he post names that are scum (some not all) thinking no one would then suspect them because 'how stupid would it be to out another scum'. thoughts?

LSU Tiger Josh · Post by **LSU Tiger Josh** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:36 pm

Well crap. I'm going to be very pissed if I find out it was a good guy that snuffed me out. If you need a sub Mandy let me know and good luck Jedis

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:00 pm

btw, has anyone seen aimless lately?

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:01 pm

For those who didn't know, Leia IS a Skywalker, and was very strong in the force. She did train to be a Jedi in the NJO.
Interesting point there if she commited suicide after learning of her husband's death. (lightsabre hara-kiri?).
I doupt it though.

EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:03 pm

Minister Masket wrote:For those who didn't know, Leia IS a Skywalker, and was very strong in the force. She did train to be a Jedi in the NJO.
Interesting point there if she commited suicide after learning of her husband's death. (lightsabre hara-kiri?).
I doupt it though.

EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".

Doubt

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:04 pm

A "b". Damn. I knew it looked wrong with the p there.
Thanks for the spelling lesson!

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:05 pm

EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".

No editing dummy :evil:

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:06 pm

The1exile wrote:
EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".

No editing dummy

You're a fool and everyone knows it.

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:07 pm

Also, Leia apparently does have a lightsabre.

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:08 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
The1exile wrote:
EDIT: I've forgotten how to spell "doupt".

No editing dummy

You're a fool and everyone knows it.

and you're apparently senile.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:10 pm

Gimpy good catch. It's typical for scum to give a group of 3 they trust, with two being good guys and one being scum. So for example, Kozy gave no real reason for trusting me, Ank and Fircola. I would bet we'll find out one of those three is scum.

And if anyone's wondering where I got that "1 scum in group of 3" logic, it's from dagreatbroomhead, who was the first person to start mafia on this site and had a book of "tells" he shared with us one game. That was one of them. I've found all his other tells and tricks to work well, and he showed that this one usually works too. Not saying it's set in stone, but it's just another tick mark for Ank and Fircola on my possible scum list. And definitely reason to keep an eye on the three listed by Kozy.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:14 pm

wicked wrote:Gimpy good catch. It's typical for scum to give a group of 3 they trust, with two being good guys and one being scum. So for example, Kozy gave no real reason for trusting me, Ank and Fircola. I would bet we'll find out one of those three is scum.

And if anyone's wondering where I got that "1 scum in group of 3" logic, it's from dagreatbroomhead, who was the first person to start mafia on this site and had a book of "tells" he shared with us one game. That was one of them. I've found all his other tells and tricks to work well, and he showed that this one usually works too. Not saying it's set in stone, but it's just another tick mark for Ank and Fircola on my possible scum list. And definitely reason to keep an eye on the three listed by Kozy.

couple this with the got tonkaeds book of tells which says that wicked is always scum and we might as well have day 2 wrapped up folks.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:16 pm

wicked wrote:Gimpy good catch. It's typical for scum to give a group of 3 they trust, with two being good guys and one being scum. So for example, Kozy gave no real reason for trusting me, Ank and Fircola. I would bet we'll find out one of those three is scum.

And if anyone's wondering where I got that "1 scum in group of 3" logic, it's from dagreatbroomhead, who was the first person to start mafia on this site and had a book of "tells" he shared with us one game. That was one of them. I've found all his other tells and tricks to work well, and he showed that this one usually works too. Not saying it's set in stone, but it's just another tick mark for Ank and Fircola on my possible scum list. And definitely reason to keep an eye on the three listed by Kozy.

You mean the guy that was a known Vong member??? Great logic... :roll:

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:26 pm

Ok, i gotta say....i'm totally lost in this game. I was sure that AK was scum considering his dumbass lying.

Anyone got any real leads ?

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:30 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:Ok, i gotta say....i'm totally lost in this game. I was sure that AK was scum considering his dumbass lying.

Anyone got any real leads ?

I got a dog lead! :lol:

Seriously, I haven't the foggiest who's who in this game.
So I'm gonna go right ahead and FOS EVERYONE.
Hope you don't mind.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:40 pm

he doesn't needd to show his pass

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:41 pm

these are not the droids we're looking for

trestain · Post by **trestain** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:53 pm

Aanark, your first post of day 2 and already on the defensive, now i'm not getting into another arguement with you for most of the day but i am still suspicious of you because of reasons stated day 1 and also your reaction to wickeds post, as that is a good scum strategy and i would expect(as you have done) scum to be the ones to shoot it down if there were any on that list, so

FOS Anarchistdream

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:08 pm

FOS MM He hasnt contributed to this game in any way. :roll:

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:11 pm

trestain wrote:Aanark, your first post of day 2 and already on the defensive, now i'm not getting into another arguement with you for most of the day but i am still suspicious of you because of reasons stated day 1 and also your reaction to wickeds post, as that is a good scum strategy and i would expect(as you have done) scum to be the ones to shoot it down if there were any on that list, so

FOS Anarchistdream

You are saying that the people that a known dead scum thought were suspicious are good people to look for the next day???

You have totally lost your marbles. So far, you have not contributed one thing to this entire game... Over 60 pages of it and you have come up with no ideas, no thoughts... You are singularly fixated on one target, and that is me.

Well, if it makes you feel any better I am Wedge... So, please, piss off.

And spell my name right, Tree stain.

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:21 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
trestain wrote:Aanark, your first post of day 2 and already on the defensive, now i'm not getting into another arguement with you for most of the day but i am still suspicious of you because of reasons stated day 1 and also your reaction to wickeds post, as that is a good scum strategy and i would expect(as you have done) scum to be the ones to shoot it down if there were any on that list, so

FOS Anarchistdream

You are saying that the people that a known dead scum thought were suspicious are good people to look for the next day???

You have totally lost your marbles. So far, you have not contributed one thing to this entire game... Over 60 pages of it and you have come up with no ideas, no thoughts... You are singularly fixated on one target, and that is me.

Well, if it makes you feel any better I am Wedge... So, please, piss off.

And spell my name right, Tree stain.

anyone familiar w/ the setting know if wedge is still alive at this point?