I see this poster all around Boston. Will anyone tell me how the hell this makes any sense at all? Try to make a logical argument fellas.
On second thought...just dont even tell me at all, I don't wanna hear it. Whenever I pass people holding up these signs on the street I just laugh to myself...alright, there was one occasion where I laughed out loud at one of them. He gave me the stink eye.
ritz627 wrote:
On second thought...just dont even tell me at all, I don't wanna hear it. Whenever I pass people holding up these signs on the street I just laugh to myself...alright, there was one occasion where roflwafflecoptersaurusrex'ed. He gave me the stink eye.
Dude if i knew how to post pictures on this site cause for some reason it cant grasp the idea of drag and paste i would show u tons of posters of george bush as a nazi
JACKAZZTJM› yea off to myspace a depressing social networking site with no social interaction! thats y i like cc at least u gotta use ur mind to hang on here!
JACKAZZTJM wrote:Dude if i knew how to post pictures on this site cause for some reason it cant grasp the idea of drag and paste i would show u tons of posters of george bush as a nazi
[ img ] POST LINK LOCATION HERE [ /img ] ........ just take out the spaces
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
One would think that, thegreekdog, but I feel that most Americans weren't bombarded with enough propaganda to pick Stalin as quickly as they would Hitler. It's interesting how much more hate is focused on Hitler than on Stalin. Didn't Stalin directly and indirectly kill more civilians? Yes. But were those civilians as loud as the one's Hitler killed? No.
That may explain one side to it.
What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
Or maybe the Stalin-Obama poster just doesn't look as cool. (<----My pick)
BigBallinStalin wrote:What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
Sigged.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
BigBallinStalin wrote:What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
Sigged.
Technically, Hitler was very helpful on that whole issue; namely, by invading the Soviet Union in the first place.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
Sigged.
Technically, Hitler was very helpful on that whole issue; namely, by invading the Soviet Union in the first place.
Technicalities were invented at McGill University in 1943, which was Stalin's planned year to invade Germany. You're completely right, Hitler was very helpful in WW2. In the first place, starting the war was probably the most helpful.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
Sigged.
Technically, Hitler was very helpful on that whole issue; namely, by invading the Soviet Union in the first place.
Technicalities were invented at McGill University in 1943, which was Stalin's planned year to invade Germany. You're completely right, Hitler was very helpful in WW2. In the first place, starting the war was probably the most helpful.
Excellent point.
The Italians were also helpful by invading Greece and then needing help from the Germans to take Greece because of the Greek resistance.
Hmm... maybe we can say that the most helpful country in ending World War Two was Greece. I think we can all agree with that.
BigBallinStalin wrote:What may help Uncle Joe's image somewhat is that the Soviet's contributed much in winning WW2 for the Allied Forces, while Hitler was just completely unhelpful on that whole issue...
Sigged.
Technically, Hitler was very helpful on that whole issue; namely, by invading the Soviet Union in the first place.
Technicalities were invented at McGill University in 1943, which was Stalin's planned year to invade Germany. You're completely right, Hitler was very helpful in WW2. In the first place, starting the war was probably the most helpful.
Excellent point.
The Italians were also helpful by invading Greece and then needing help from the Germans to take Greece because of the Greek resistance.
Hmm... maybe we can say that the most helpful country in ending World War Two was Greece. I think we can all agree with that.
Armed with somewhat antiquated guns and white battle skirts, the Greeks put up a mighty stiff resistance.
I've gotta give it to ya; the Greeks are too underrated. I think they are the world's real superheroes, which were probably based on the Greek gods and goddesses.
