REPEAT Multi:majorqueen,theredarmy,guerredumonde,schwartz979

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Locked
bmw
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:44 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA (They're initials, not a car; though, admittedly, rather convenient initials...)

REPEAT Multi:majorqueen,theredarmy,guerredumonde,schwartz979

Post by bmw »

(ref: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=982)

This pigfu ... well, I -try- to stay away from name-calling ... is at it again.

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?s ... majorqueen

The account majorqueen signed up after Lack's verdict in the other thread that banned the first three multi accounts (theredarmy, guerredumonde, schwartz979) from playing together, and the first four games majorqueen ever joined were all with the other three accounts.

Look at the games, and you see the same patterns all over again; no continent-breaking attacks between the accounts, playing turns just moments apart (even in freestyle games where they could play simultaneously, it's immediate sequential instead; see, for example, http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=14657). As I said before, even if by chance they aren't a multi, they clearly have that secret alliance thing going.

They've already been warned once. Is there a point at which all four of these accounts just get outright banned? I sure hope so.
bmw
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:44 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA (They're initials, not a car; though, admittedly, rather convenient initials...)

Post by bmw »

Heh; this is pretty amazing.

Image

The facts:
* Yellow and Blue are the ones I'm accusing of being a multi, or -at least- having a 'secret alliance' going.
* Blue had 6 armies on New Guinea.
* Yellow had 3 armies on Indonesia.
* Red showed up with 18 armies on Siam.
* Yellow deployed 5 more armies on Indonesia and didn't do anything with them except let them sit there.
* Yellow and blue took turns sequentially in a matter of minutes, despite being a freestyle game.

My opinion:
* Yellow, known for an amazing winning record, can't seriously expect his 8 armies to stand against both 6 blue armies AND 18 red armies in a fight for Oceania, stuck right between those two. Instead, it sure looks like blue was at serious risk of getting overrun by red before being able to secure Oceania and build some more forces there, so the 5 yellow armies were deployed essentially as a shield to blue. The idea here would be that red would eat up armies trying to take out the yellow ones, leaving both depleted and an easy take for blue.

Also, notice the complete absence of a game chat, which is very characteristic of the games played by these accounts despite clear cooperation.

( Screen shot from morning [PDT] Tue 4/18 )

2c.
-Bryce
User avatar
lackattack
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Post by lackattack »

schwartz979, guerredumonde, theredarmy, lajeunesse and majorqueen are now banned for real (actually it's been a week now...)
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”