Shall we have some fun? [closed]

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:30 pm

Accused:

[NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[NBK]xTEASLEYx
KT0280

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Or possibly Secret Demopolocy, but I doubt it.

Game number(s):
3 player with [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx & KT0280
[game6011818][/game] Once the 3rd player is eliminated, every single one of their turns was 1 minute apart. And while the 3rd guy was in there, they mostly bgoth attacked him. Or KT0280 mostly attacked them both to gain an advantage, while [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx was doing the dirty work weakening the 3rd player.

2 player with [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx & KT0280
[game]6012248[/game] [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx attacks mostly neutrals, basically giving KT0280 the win. Yet again, taking turns minutes apart.

3 player with all 3 accused.
[game]6017413[/game] [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx mostly attack each other the whole game, leaving KT0280 to easily take the win. Taking turns minutes apart from each other.

8 player with both [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx & KT0280
[game]6022780[/game] [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx is protecting KT0280's bonus, while he is holding SA, while the only thing keeping him from breaking it is a 1, which isdn't bad odds with 7v1. Once again, not too much time between their turns.

Freestyle doubles with both KT0280 & [NBK]xTEASLEYx
[game]6039176[/game]
Playing one minute apart each turn. Enough time for a newb to sign out, and back in.

2 player with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]6016686[/game] It's freestyle, and they still always play one right after the other, not verry much time apart.

2 player with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]6006581[/game] It's freestyle, and they still always play one right after the other, not verry much time apart.

4 player 2.1 assassin with [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]6005435[/game] Must I explain? Red said it in the game chat himself. ^-^

3 player freestyle with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]3749243[/game] Same as before. both basically worked together, and played one after the other, with enough time to sign in and out.

1v1 with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]3743901[/game] Need I explain it again? Same as always.

1v1 with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]3743830[/game] Same as the last. ^-^

3 player with both [NBK]xTEASLEYx & [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx
[game]3743493[/game] Need I explain? Same as every other 3 player game these cheaters were in.
Comments:

All comments are above. And the fact that both [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx and [NBK]xTEASLEYx joined the same day, and KT0280 joined one day before.

Can someone say busted already? haha

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:33 pm

Ok. Lets not have any bullshit here people. haha. It took time for me to come up with this lame info!!!!! And the fact that I'm also drunk, so it took even longer.

Hsur · Post by **Hsur** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:52 pm

I'm in one the games with these two. [game]6022780[/game] I questioned[NBK]xSUPERDUDEx about his weird play in this game and here is the response i got;

2009-12-04 20:37:00 - Hsur: Just a question................Superdude, why block for KT0280? Why not break his bonus?
2009-12-06 19:13:18 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: i would but i have a different strategy...if i do then i lose troops i gain then destro
2009-12-06 23:13:44 - Hsur: It wouldn't take much.

Don't know what he exactly meant by the bolded part.

I know this is an escalating game and bonuses don't figure into who wins most of the time, but to let someone keep a bonus when there is a 7 v 1 is just bad play or secret diplomacy or multi playing. I'm leaning towards the multi part myself.

alex951 · Post by **alex951** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:41 pm

i smell multi here. they're game play reeks of it

angola · Post by **angola** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:06 pm

gcwca_4_life wrote:Ok. Lets not have any bullshit here people. haha. It took time for me to come up with this lame info!!!!! And the fact that I'm also drunk, so it took even longer.

You are drunk at 12:33 p.m.? Impressive.

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:34 pm

angola wrote:
gcwca_4_life wrote:Ok. Lets not have any bullshit here people. haha. It took time for me to come up with this lame info!!!!! And the fact that I'm also drunk, so it took even longer.

You are drunk at 12:33 p.m.? Impressive.

I've been drunk all day. Want a cup???

Hmmm. Looks like this may take a while...

TheForgivenOne · Post by **TheForgivenOne** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:45 pm

You are my hero, to be spotting multi's in your condition

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:07 pm

alex951 wrote:i smell multi here. they're game play reeks of it

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:43 pm

Come on!!! I give all this info, and it's not even pending yet?!?!?!

:cry:

VampireM · Post by **VampireM** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:40 pm

just because they haven't labeled it pending doesn't mean they arn't already discussing it... they will post something soon enough..

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:12 pm

VampireM wrote:just because they haven't labeled it pending doesn't mean they arn't already discussing it... they will post something soon enough..

I know! I know! Can't a drunk man hassle the mods when he wants to?

VampireM · Post by **VampireM** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:21 pm

lol he sure can, just thought i would ease ur mind... but go to town

Hsur · Post by **Hsur** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:41 pm

These accounts say they are family, all playing from the same comp. If they don't get busted for multiple accounts, they should at least be warned and blocked from playing against each other.

Posted from game chat:[game]6022780[/game]

009-12-08 02:43:06 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: i hjad this account for almost a year...i just stopped playing for a while so i just started playing again
2009-12-08 02:43:46 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: and yes me and kt0280 are family but we play as a competition and fight eachother
2009-12-08 02:44:14 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: we take turns so quick because were usually on the computer at the same time

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:17 pm

VampireM wrote:lol he sure can, just thought i would ease ur mind... but go to town

Want a drink? got plenty? Vodka? Beer? Whiskey?

Ok. More for me. haha

Hsur wrote:These accounts say they are family, all playing from the same comp. If they don't get busted for multiple accounts, they should at least be warned and blocked from playing against each other.

Posted from game chat:[game]6022780[/game]

009-12-08 02:43:06 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: i hjad this account for almost a year...i just stopped playing for a while so i just started playing again
2009-12-08 02:43:46 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: and yes me and kt0280 are family but we play as a competition and fight eachother
2009-12-08 02:44:14 - [NBK]xSUPERDUDEx: we take turns so quick because were usually on the computer at the same time

bullocks. He talks crap! lol. CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lol

Hsur · Post by **Hsur** » Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:14 pm

I didn't say I agree..........This is what I think of these accounts. :^o

So on the conspiracy theory, count me out.

gcwca_4_life · Post by **gcwca_4_life** » Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:21 am

Hsur wrote:I didn't say I agree..........This is what I think of these accounts.

So on the conspiracy theory, count me out.

Aaaw. So your not gonna back me up with the conspiracy theory?

Damn. NVM.

Forgot it takes up to 5 people for a conspiracy. haha

DJPatrick · Post by **DJPatrick** » Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:30 am

you're being tag-teamed...any "family/friends' playing from teh same puta should state this at the outset./..(don't know if policy or just ettiquette)...I have done with family before but at least that was in "team games"...(didn't help much still got wiped bu to King herpes credit he at least let my ten yr old take him out--when he knew the win was assurred0..;.these guys smell like rotten fish...another bourbon should help...

Hsur · Post by **Hsur** » Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:46 pm

gcwca_4_life wrote:
Hsur wrote:I didn't say I agree..........This is what I think of these accounts.

So on the conspiracy theory, count me out.

Aaaw. So your not gonna back me up with the conspiracy theory?

Damn. NVM.

Forgot it takes up to 5 people for a conspiracy. haha

Ok,count me back in. Here's my conspiracy theory. They know each other and conducted secret diplomacy, or the accounts are multiple accounts. Either way, they have, IMO, cheated.

Hsur · Post by **Hsur** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:38 am

Is this being looked into?

vodean · Post by **vodean** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:15 am

Wouldn't they be more individual in their usernames????

jleonnn · Post by **jleonnn** » Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:51 am

the minutes apart part really give them away, yet they could be friends...

Post by **Evil Semp** » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:16 am

[NBK]xSUPERDUDEx and [NBK]xTEASLEYx have been busted.
KT0280 not enough evidence at this time.

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:04 pm

alex951 wrote:i smell multi here. they're game play reeks of it

their

jleonnn · Post by **jleonnn** » Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:34 pm

grammar 101 is in session... :roll:

Shall we have some fun? [closed]

Shall we have some fun? [closed]

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun? [pending]

Re: Shall we have some fun? [pending]

Re: Shall we have some fun? [pending]

Re: Shall we have some fun?

Re: Shall we have some fun? [closed]