
Could be fun, no?
Moderator: Cartographers


drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Sakhalin? Well, on the map The Russian Federation has been cut up a as to show the whole thing would be too much for the map... plus Sakhalin didn't secede from the Union. Unless you're talking about something I don't know about.jefjef wrote:I believe your are missin an island in the pacific that was conquered from Japan.
I was looking for another tert for ya. As far as the Russian Federation goes it is made up of states itself.Industrial Helix wrote:Sakhalin? Well, on the map The Russian Federation has been cut up a as to show the whole thing would be too much for the map... plus Sakhalin didn't secede from the Union. Unless you're talking about something I don't know about.jefjef wrote:I believe your are missin an island in the pacific that was conquered from Japan.
@Andy.. Yeah I see what you mean, but I kind of intended it to be that way. It's just kind of a thought rather than an actual plan. What would you prefer to see in this map?
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Yeah, Russia can attack Poland.captainwalrus wrote:I am not really felling this, but the idea is good.
A few things:
The theme needs to be made more clear, but I don't know how.
It bugs me when there are some really big territories and some really small ones, if you like it that way, that is fine, but Russian Federation overpowers things like Estonia.
Can Russian Fed. attack Poland?
Hmm... well, the independence of Estonia only seems to occur during a hiccup in Russian geopolitical power... 1918, 1991. The norm is that it is occupied and given Russia's recent return to power from the early 1990s, Russia stands poised to overpower Estonia again.MarshalNey wrote:The Russians were the de facto ruling class of the Soviet Union, and of course the Russian Federation should be able to overpower Estonia... but if that's the case then why did Estonia get away with independence?
The answer is that keeping many of these places became more trouble than it was worth, economically and politically- particularly the Warsaw Pact countries of Eastern Europe. I know that I'm not stating anything new, but I think that these facts could work into the theme of the map.
If you made the Russian Federation the central piece of this map you might be able to capture the feel of the Russians' embattled struggle to maintain its political hegemony.
What if, for instance, the Russian Federation was a big bonus all to itself, like a +4 or +5. However, every country held in addition to the Federation gave a negative (-1) bonus, as they are full of restive ethnic populations. Along these lines, maybe some more rebellious or particularly unproductive areas (The Polish union strikes, Lithuanian rebellion and Georgian revolution come to mind) give an even greater negative (-2) bonus.
For players who don't have the Federation, then maybe there is some over-arching bonus for uniting the satellites or the Baltic States or other geopoltical regions. It seems like the bonuses are pretty slim in the map right now- you get +2 for 4 satellite countries, but there are only 6 total.
I think it might spice up the dynamic, by making the Russian Federation both a mighty engine by itself and a disaster in combination with other countries- sort of a curse in disguise.


Hmm, I like it.Industrial Helix wrote:Well... this was just a little trial run to see how people felt about small maps with super bonuses. I wasn't going to include it in the map pack as its gameplay is totally different and is about the collapse of communism, as opposed to rise. But I guess if there's a demand to see the map make its way through then I'm down with that.
For the map pack, the staple idea are commanders and a city/territory base. Perhaps for this map there could be the dissidents like Havel and Walesa and Yeltsin/Gorbachev which one way the cities. Could be a conquest map, the neutrals representing soviet rule.
Thoughts anyone?
this is good idea. I´ve read that you, Helix thought about disidents (Havel, Walesa). the map has not much regions now, so there should be a place for any new... maybe in Soviet Union should be Gorbatchov and in Soviet´s satelites some disidents, and holding them brings any bonus...DJ Teflon wrote:Ok - how about the politicians. There could be independance guys from the revolutionising states, liberal soviets and imperialist soviets - objectives / bonuses could be linked to holding a combination of the liberal soviets + 1 or 2 others. How the politicians connect to the main map regions coulkd be determined according to what makes the gameplay work best.