Moderator: Community Team
silent wind wrote:er... um... I mean...
Sir... don't you think that haven been given their freedom, land grants and the opportunity to make a future for themselves that reparations have already been made? Also, I seriously doubt that we can afford to shell out any monies, after the grand ass fucking that this fucking company has been rendered by fucking multi national corporations... fucking white devils that they are!!!!
PLAYER57832 wrote:silent wind wrote:er... um... I mean...
Sir... don't you think that haven been given their freedom, land grants and the opportunity to make a future for themselves that reparations have already been made? Also, I seriously doubt that we can afford to shell out any monies, after the grand ass fucking that this fucking company has been rendered by fucking multi national corporations... fucking white devils that they are!!!!
They were not given land grants. Freedom was taken from them and could be said to be a gift given back. That said, I don't believe reparations are owed.
Still, you might get more of an audiance if you at least voiced your disaproval in a more moderate manner.
silent wind wrote:er... um... I mean...
Sir... don't you think that haven been given their freedom, land grants and the opportunity to make a future for themselves
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
PLAYER57832 wrote:silent wind wrote:er... um... I mean...
Sir... don't you think that haven been given their freedom, land grants and the opportunity to make a future for themselves that reparations have already been made? Also, I seriously doubt that we can afford to shell out any monies, after the grand ass fucking that this fucking company has been rendered by fucking multi national corporations... fucking white devils that they are!!!!
They were not given land grants. Freedom was taken from them and could be said to be a gift given back. That said, I don't believe reparations are owed.
Still, you might get more of an audiance if you at least voiced your disaproval in a more moderate manner.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Actually, during Reconstruction (early years at least) the former slaves were given land grants. Didn't really help in the long run, but they were given.
strike wolf wrote:silent wind wrote:er... um... I mean...
Sir... don't you think that haven been given their freedom, land grants and the opportunity to make a future for themselves
YOu say it like freedom is an honor that you have to have given to you and not a right of living in this country.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
PLAYER57832 wrote:Moral and ethical for those who are responsible. The problem today is that far too many people who's ancestors are not responsible would be asked to pay.
At the time slavery happened, it was the societal norm, not just in the US, but in most of Africa. None of that justifies it, but who, exactly is to pay? The africans who first conquered and sold other peoples? The Europeans who got wealthy off the trade while claiming ignorance of the result? The Americans who bought and sold people? What of those who are descended from the guilty?
Also, as was mentioned in another thread, are the people here, today, better off or worse off those those in Africa? In many cases, they are actually better off... in many cases, Particularly for women, better off by far. That in no way, shape or form justifies slavery, but it does beg the question whether, at this point, reparations are really due.
Also, though slavery is often attributed strictly to blacks, in fact people of all races were enslaved. Whites were bondservants. They had definite advantage over others in that they were more often able to gain freedom and once free, they became like any other settler or colonists. Blacks could gain freedom, but were never "just like anyone else". However, Chinese, Mexicans, etc and certainly Native Americans were all enslaved.
If anyone is owed reparations, I would say it is not the blacks, it is native americans.


john9blue wrote:If you support reparations, then you support the notion that two wrongs make a right, an eye for an eye philosophy, etc.
muy_thaiguy wrote:And I agree with you on the reparations part. No one today can be held responsible for the actions of their ancestors, especially of something that ended 145 years ago.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Moral and ethical for those who are responsible. The problem today is that far too many people who's ancestors are not responsible would be asked to pay.
At the time slavery happened, it was the societal norm, not just in the US, but in most of Africa. None of that justifies it, but who, exactly is to pay? The africans who first conquered and sold other peoples? The Europeans who got wealthy off the trade while claiming ignorance of the result? The Americans who bought and sold people? What of those who are descended from the guilty?
Also, as was mentioned in another thread, are the people here, today, better off or worse off those those in Africa? In many cases, they are actually better off... in many cases, Particularly for women, better off by far. That in no way, shape or form justifies slavery, but it does beg the question whether, at this point, reparations are really due.
Also, though slavery is often attributed strictly to blacks, in fact people of all races were enslaved. Whites were bondservants. They had definite advantage over others in that they were more often able to gain freedom and once free, they became like any other settler or colonists. Blacks could gain freedom, but were never "just like anyone else". However, Chinese, Mexicans, etc and certainly Native Americans were all enslaved.
If anyone is owed reparations, I would say it is not the blacks, it is native americans.
john9blue wrote:If you support reparations, then you support the notion that two wrongs make a right, an eye for an eye philosophy, etc.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
SultanOfSurreal wrote:john9blue wrote:If you support reparations, then you support the notion that two wrongs make a right, an eye for an eye philosophy, etc.
i like how you apparently think shelling out a pittance for black people is the same thing as three motherfucking centuries of slavery. god you have to be the dumbest poster here.
jonesthecurl wrote:The last time that any of my family were involved in slavery was probably when some of my anglo-saxon ancestors enslaved some of my celtic ancestors in the 6th century.
john9blue wrote:My point stands. Do two wrongs make a right,
especially now that the odds of repeating our past mistakes are virtually zero,
and blacks have nearly the same opportunity as whites?
Even the slight racism that persists today
should be corrected by other means than "here's a few bucks, sorry about your ancestors"... It's ridiculous.
rockfist wrote:Ah the magical government will pay for it. So we the citizens wouldn't have to. I understand now...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"