[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Comments: These two players never attacked each other to break bonuses (or at all) even though there were singles facing them. It was up to me and "red" to attempt to break their bonuses.
Comments: These two players never attacked each other to break bonuses (or at all) even though there were singles facing them. It was up to me and "red" to attempt to break their bonuses.
Not enough to support Secret Diplomacy here. After looking through the game and seeing if they have played any games before, this was there first and only game played together. Further do to the 2 of you always attcking the bonuses is prob why they didnt. But I will note this just incase the issue comes up again.
Further, ref. the name being a racial slur of some sort. Yes, it might be if thats the only way your looking at the name. I do not feel in this case that is what is being used as. Therefore I dont see this as an issue.
sweet... i was just asking... i know it is also a name, was just wondering if it was his name or a slur... this is what C&A is for... thanks!-the black jesus
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
owenshooter wrote:sweet... i was just asking... i know it is also a name, was just wondering if it was his name or a slur... this is what C&A is for... thanks!-the black jesus
No problem Owen. If fact I didn't know it was also a name until I did a google search.
owenshooter wrote:sweet... i was just asking... i know it is also a name, was just wondering if it was his name or a slur... this is what C&A is for... thanks!-the black jesus
No problem Owen. If fact I didn't know it was also a name until I did a google search.
