Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Fixed Linkscodland wrote:mcclutchy
killyp
agent price
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 8384646
Comments:
they play triples together alot, blue has 1's everywhere xcept when bordering on someone elses territory. thye have not taken a binus off each other but attacked stronger players.

im thinking multismurphy16 wrote:
Blue with Asia, Green with Australia, and red with part of Africa, all well defended except where the 3 touch in a free for all. I think he has a good secret diplomacy case here.

when my brother was accused of being a multi i was about to go in there and yell my head off. I realized that if i wanted to help i should of stayed out of it. you should just sit back explain your side of the story then back off. the more you talk in it the more it seems like you should be bannedAgent Price wrote:Wow, I didn't realize we were supposed to just sit quietly in the corner while we're accused of cheating.

Again looking at the screen shot red did have his borders defended, at least where the amount of troops let him. In central Africa it looks like he was trying to protect the orange area and not worry about the pink area. Not attacking blues bonus would be a concern and the same with green. He only had one 1 border and that was with blue also.murphy16 wrote:Blue with Asia, Green with Australia, and red with part of Africa, all well defended except where the 3 touch in a free for all. I think he has a good secret diplomacy case here.
I don't see how either green or red could take out blue, it doesn't look like either have enough troops to accomplish a kill. Why go for a kill if you don't think you can make it? Maybe in earlier turns they might have been able to make a kill.dr.lucas wrote:thanks for the current game screen shot.
yes this looks to be a cut and dry case of secret diplomacy. especially since it is a terminator game and the points of blue are up for grabs but neither red nor green are making a move to take the points.

Given that you didn't provide any evidence of actual diplomacy its hard to see what more ES could have done. He's noted it in case of further complaints, so it wasn't just cleared. He won't just unilaterally ban players without evidence.codland wrote:if you looked at the game log you would see how it was a clear case of secret diplomacy but hey whatever, obviously no point bringing any thing to attention.

And wouldn't taking each others bonus be counter productive when there are stronger player on the board.codland wrote: thye have not taken a binus off each other but attacked stronger players.
I did look at the game log and did not see how it was a CLEAR CASE OF SECRET DIPLOMACY. You the accuser should try to provide as much evidence as possible. Just saying the didn't break each others bonus isn't enough. I put more of an effort to explain why I didn't think there was diplomacy then you put in to your complaint. I only have the game log and screen shots if provided, you were in the game make some effort to convince me as to why they should have been warned.codland wrote:if you looked at the game log you would see how it was a clear case of secret diplomacy but hey whatever, obviously no point bringing any thing to attention.
