TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [Busted] KS

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Post Reply
User avatar
VicFontaine
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: The Dominion

TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [Busted] KS

Post by VicFontaine »

Accused:

drama.lover.610
TexRitter71

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 8916033
"It is a good day to die."
User avatar
Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
Posts: 3236
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

Post by Caymanmew »

can you explain why you think this is a multi/SD? if you do it will help a lot
Image
User avatar
VicFontaine
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: The Dominion

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

Post by VicFontaine »

1) Relatively close join-Conquer-Club dates
2) Virtually no communication between the two of them, short of a FIRST ROUND, before anything had happened, "Hey let's truce against VicFontaine until he's dead." The other player didn't respond.
3) Until I was dead, they never attacked each other.
4) When I attempted to call them out and get some response, I got, um...some words from one of them.
5) No other responses.

Just very bizarre behavior from two people, one of whom hadn't even completed 5 games, and the other who was clearly a noob.

That's it.
"It is a good day to die."
User avatar
king sam
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
Gender: Male

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

Post by king sam »

pending.


KS
Image
TexRitter71
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

Post by TexRitter71 »

caymanmew wrote:can you explain why you think this is a multi/SD? if you do it will help a lot
yeah i just joined about a week ago and i got on this game the chat from drama said do i want to elim the other player i thought since it was in the open to the chat room it was legal
TexRitter71
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610

Post by TexRitter71 »

If i Broke the rules i apologize but first i will say this

1 join times were recent. who cares,
2 neither attacked each other when playing the game. i am new i just got my first rating today, and drama. lover is the same level as me, would it not be allowed for to new players to eliminate the best and fight at their own level, it isnt fair that people with that level of play can play with newbies. so for VicFontaine to be mad at to Privates ganging up on him is NOOBISH and Stupid.


Texritter71
TexRitter71
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

Post by TexRitter71 »

‹Evil Semp› As long as all discussions about truces and alliances are in game chat there is nothing wrong

this is what the one of the mods said about this WHOLE Thing
User avatar
king sam
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
Gender: Male

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

Post by king sam »

TexRitter71 wrote:‹Evil Semp› As long as all discussions about truces and alliances are in game chat there is nothing wrong

this is what the one of the mods said about this WHOLE Thing
Tex where are you pulling this quote from Evil Semp from? I would like to know the reference
Image
Masli
Posts: 3000
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:43 am
Gender: Male

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

Post by Masli »

they talked in live chat
Image
drama.lover.610
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:05 am

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

Post by drama.lover.610 »

Masli wrote:they talked in live chat
Does this mean that we are found "not guilty" of all charges? Thank you so much! How would I press charges on VicFontaine for abuse? I don't want a bunch of other people to have to go through what I just did! Thanks again!
User avatar
king sam
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
Gender: Male

Re: TexRitter71 & drama.lover.610 [pending] KS

Post by king sam »

TexRitter71 wrote:‹Evil Semp› As long as all discussions about truces and alliances are in game chat there is nothing wrong

this is what the one of the mods said about this WHOLE Thing
aright for clarification, quoting a part of a text without the rest of the context is just like mis-quoting. Yes the statement you have excerpted from ES is true, discussions on truces need to be in open chat, any other means is SD. However, blindly offering truces with people that you know in games to help sway the victory in one of your favors is a from of cheating. It is SD, cause you entered the game with the intention of throwing the game one way or the other.

If anyone needs further clarification, feel free to ask or PM.

Regardless, dramlover no need to worry about filing charges against someone else for bringing up a legit claim. He brought it up cause it had merit, and after some investigation evidence showed that their were facts to his thought process. These 2 are Busted as multis.

KS
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”