overextending

[TAZ2012]

I've discovere one main problem, with the way I play, that has led me to lose nearly every single game.
Overextending my forces, trying to take all at once. How can i curb this? I do it every game.
to simplify it, I get greedy, and lose the game.

[Woodruff]

I've discovere one main problem, with the way I play, that has led me to lose nearly every single game.
Overextending my forces, trying to take all at once. How can i curb this? I do it every game.
to simplify it, I get greedy, and lose the game.

Well...don't get greedy and overextend yourself? I mean...it seems like you've identified your problem, and the obvious answer is simply to play more conservatively.

What sorts of game-types do you typically play?

[Jippd]

The best suggestion would be to join the society of the cooks. They will teach you how to play games and work with you, a lot more then you could learn from this one thread.

Like you said yourself thought, stop overextending...if you can't defend it, then what is the point of taking it. All you do is waste more troops and make yourself a target.

[vonraider]

I have played over 400 games now and I still do it. I guess it's a matter of self control!

[Iron Butterfly]

It depends on they game type. It depends on the map.

Escalating you win by staying alive with several stacks spread startegicly across the map. The card cash is what wins these games not the land bonus.

While playing a no spoiks game patience is key as is timing. A bonus is very important for these games.

It would help if we knew your map and game format.

[Jatekos]

I've discovere one main problem, with the way I play, that has led me to lose nearly every single game.
Overextending my forces, trying to take all at once. How can i curb this? I do it every game.
to simplify it, I get greedy, and lose the game.

Think ahead: Plan your actions as well as trying to predict your opponents' reactions (for at least one round).
Be prepared for the worst possible scenario, too: What would happen if your attacks failed and your opponents only rolled 6s and would be able to cash their cards.

If your original plan still seems to be good then execute it. If you feel that you would be overextending and would not be able to hold the bonus zones you wanted to take over then it is very likely to be so. In these cases you should try to come up with a better plan.

[Viceroy63]

I have played over 400 games now and I still do it. I guess it's a matter of self control!

Sounds like you also need to join up with the SoC's. =)

[oss spy]

I often see myself doing this too. The key here is to get a bonus semi-early and not to to after another one for quite a while. If you play with fog, build up troops one territory behind the boarder of a bonus you want to go after next. When you have enough troops (do a few probing attacks ahead of time to get an estimate of their troop count) you should go after the bonus and try to get it all in one turn to avoid a war of attrition. This is the reason you'll need a lot of troops- you need to defend the boarder after you get it.

The key is to not attack until you can defend yourself from a counterattack and to only attack if you have an overwhelming force. Nothing's worse than building a big stack only to find that the enemy has a bigger one.

[aad0906]

Do NOT get a bonus if you aren't reasonably sure you can't keep it. Once you have a bonus, put up proper defenses. Who is neighbouring it and how much do they deploy each turn. Also, people tend to gang up on the dominating player. Try to be lurking in the shadow as the number 2 guy, ready to step in.

[oss spy]

Do NOT get a bonus if you aren't reasonably sure you can't keep it. Once you have a bonus, put up proper defenses. Who is neighbouring it and how much do they deploy each turn. Also, people tend to gang up on the dominating player. Try to be lurking in the shadow as the number 2 guy, ready to step in.

This is what I said...

[W F Crappeshotte]

Different maps and different game types require different tactics: there is no "one size fits all." It's a matter of delicate judgement, assessing when to switch from slow and steady expansion to the sudden killer land-grab that tips the game in your favour. In my case, I usually play TOO conservatively and someone else makes that killer land-grab "the turn before I was going to." Oh yes... The other players' styles make a bit of a difference too!

You've identified the problem and you know the answer, so it's all down to you. If you really cannot restrain yourself, then let the game do it for you and try playing Trench.

[Kaskavel]

Much good advice here. I will add one more piece that is not usualy heard of. Do not attack from defending positions, no matter what the strengh you have. If your boarder of a bonus has 10 troops, this does not mean that you have to attack the adjacent 3s, despite the fact that you have the attacker's advantage.

[DannyUncanny]

The key thing is your understanding of the game. Armies are power, territory is not. Territories are a liability, they have to be defended, they spread you thin. They are only worthwhile if their payout covers their cost, and often it doesn't, because as soon as you have a bonus, people want to attack you, and you are throwing away armies fighting. If you just kept to yourself adding 3 at a time, you might end up with more armies than you would fighting for territory.

[Viceroy63]

For all things under heaven there is a time and a season. You can never go wrong with being patient at first and just build up your forces for that eventual land strike because the only way to win this game is to gain all the land. But doing it all in the right way and time.

[Arama86n]

The key thing is your understanding of the game. Armies are power, territory is not. Territories are a liability, they have to be defended, they spread you thin. They are only worthwhile if their payout covers their cost, and often it doesn't, because as soon as you have a bonus, people want to attack you, and you are throwing away armies fighting. If you just kept to yourself adding 3 at a time, you might end up with more armies than you would fighting for territory.

For all things under heaven there is a time and a season. You can never go wrong with being patient at first and just build up your forces for that eventual land strike because the only way to win this game is to gain all the land. But doing it all in the right way and time.

Well said gentlemen.
It is the thing that seperates the men from the boys in many games. I tend to sit back and let others beat themselves bloody and bide my time. Still working on getting that timing right though, it's an art.

[ShiningLion]

Simple answer (not to overextend) but difficult to execute. Similar to day trading/scalping