[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
both started the game together....then when the game started ... both attacked me...never each other...till I had no chance......
I may be wrong...but it looked bad
Gary30060 wrote:both started the game together....then when the game started ... both attacked me...never each other...till I had no chance...... I may be wrong...but it looked bad
AK, you're good, no game number, no nothing, but you still know what he's talking about!
"You have undertaken to cheat me. I won't sue you, for the law is too slow. I'll ruin you." -- Cornelius Vanderbilt
Oh, I just recognized the names in the title because I had cleared them of multis about 17 hours beforehand. Thats where the link goes, to that other thread.
I've posted on the other similar post highlighted above about this topic as well.
LittleGeneral and I did not have an alliance with the game with Gary who started this topic. Please view the record, and see how Gary was just whining for no reason. I did attack LittleGeneral from the beginning, and he attacked me. In fact, LittleGeneral was dominating on me for a long time. Gary was not good at this game and by far the weakest player. He can't be mad at me for beating him, when he played so poorly. He left himself open to be attacked. And since he was playing so bad, of course i wanted to finish him off so i could get his cards.
LittleGeneral and i do not have an alliance. And during that specific game with Gary at no time did we communicate with each other through phone or IM, and at no time prior did we collude to make an alliance.
While yes, we did intend to join the same game, we did not make any alliance. The record in that game shows that is clear. The match was more than fair. Gary can't blame others for his lack of skill.
I actually think Gary needs to be looked into, i've never seen someone with so much negative feedback. Clearly something is wrong.