I really do think both of these accounts are under the same user!,
I ask Conquer Club to Deeply Investigate this matter. Thank you.
JOHNNYROCKET24 and CivProBlows , Multis!!!
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
SolidWolf34
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: {I Suggest You Go Cut Squid and Take Them to Bed with You}
- Contact:
-
ClessAlvein
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:30 pm
SolidWolf comes through again.! This guy really should be a mod, like he says.! He just be bustin multis right AND left.! Wow.! This guy is like, great.! or something.!
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Re: JOHNNYROCKET24 and CivProBlows , Multis!!!
SolidWolf34 wrote:I really do think both of these accounts are under the same user!.
You must be sick.
-
SolidWolf34
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: {I Suggest You Go Cut Squid and Take Them to Bed with You}
- Contact:
-
SolidWolf34
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: {I Suggest You Go Cut Squid and Take Them to Bed with You}
- Contact:
-
pancakemix
- Posts: 7973
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The Grim Guzzler
-
Anarkistsdream
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
- Gender: Male
-
SolidWolf34
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: {I Suggest You Go Cut Squid and Take Them to Bed with You}
- Contact:
-
Anarkistsdream
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
- Gender: Male
SolidWolf34 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:We alreayd all know Solidwolf is a dildo... Why is this even important...
Oh... yeah... I'ts NOT!
shut the hell up man. why don't u come say it to my face.. all you know what to do is cut squid and take them to bed with you.. so WATCH IT
Why don't I come say that to your face....? Was that a question? If so, use a question mark...
And PM me your address, I'll make sure you get something nice in the mail.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
-
SolidWolf34
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: {I Suggest You Go Cut Squid and Take Them to Bed with You}
- Contact:
Anarkistsdream wrote:SolidWolf34 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:We alreayd all know Solidwolf is a dildo... Why is this even important...
Oh... yeah... I'ts NOT!
shut the hell up man. why don't u come say it to my face.. all you know what to do is cut squid and take them to bed with you.. so WATCH IT
Why don't I come say that to your face....? Was that a question? If so, use a question mark...
And PM me your address, I'll make sure you get something nice in the mail.
Shut the hell up!! You have been reported to my Local Police Office, I will make sure something is done about what you just said!!
-
Anarkistsdream
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
- Gender: Male
SolidWolf34 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:SolidWolf34 wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:We alreayd all know Solidwolf is a dildo... Why is this even important...
Oh... yeah... I'ts NOT!
shut the hell up man. why don't u come say it to my face.. all you know what to do is cut squid and take them to bed with you.. so WATCH IT
Why don't I come say that to your face....? Was that a question? If so, use a question mark...
And PM me your address, I'll make sure you get something nice in the mail.
Shut the hell up!! You have been reported to my Local Police Office, I will make sure something is done about what you just said!!
AHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
I'm posting this ALL OVER THIS SITE!!!
hahahahahaha
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
-
Anarkistsdream
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
- Gender: Male
-
SolidWolf34
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: {I Suggest You Go Cut Squid and Take Them to Bed with You}
- Contact:
[u]Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law[/u]
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
-
Anarkistsdream
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
- Gender: Male
-
Sammy gags
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 6:26 pm
- Location: ?????
-
pancakemix
- Posts: 7973
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The Grim Guzzler
Solidwolf, let me ask you a quick question. What do you think your local police department will do?
Epic Win
"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross
"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
-
vtmarik
- Posts: 3863
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
- Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.
- Contact:
SolidWolf34 wrote:[u]Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law[/u]
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
Translation: The fact that Supreme Court Justices can write opinions in Court decisions that have nothing to do with the case at hand or any law is bad.
Relevance: Who the f*ck knows?
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!