Conservapedia

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Conservapedia

Post by Woodruff »

...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Haggis_McMutton
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Haggis_McMutton »



As with any logical proposition, one contradiction disproves the proposed rule. If each of 43 counterexamples has merely a 10% chance of being valid -- an underestimate -- then the probability that the Earth is billions of years old is only 1%. In other words, the Earth must be young with a likelihood of 99%


I had to stop there, barely managed not to burst out laughing.


Also, I can never tell if things like this are parodies or not.
It still blows my mind that chicktracts isn't a parody.
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Woodruff »

Haggis_McMutton wrote:


As with any logical proposition, one contradiction disproves the proposed rule. If each of 43 counterexamples has merely a 10% chance of being valid -- an underestimate -- then the probability that the Earth is billions of years old is only 1%. In other words, the Earth must be young with a likelihood of 99%


I had to stop there, barely managed not to burst out laughing.


Did you read the first line of the entry for the Bible?

Haggis_McMutton wrote:Also, I can never tell if things like this are parodies or not.
It still blows my mind that chicktracts isn't a parody.


Conservapedia is not a parody. It is run by a New York attorney who felt that Wikipedia was too liberal. I have never noticed that Wikipedia was particularly liberal, myself.

And I agree with you about Chicktracts...that's some more really bizarre stuff.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Conservapedia

Post by natty dread »

Oh man, I remember that site - a year or two back I used to read it for laughs - it's so fucking awesome.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservape ... servapedia

Also, some more gems:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Theory_of_relativity
www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_agenda
Image
User avatar
Maugena
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:07 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Maugena »


The intelligence of humans is rapidly declining, whether measured by SAT scores,[14] music, personal letters,[15] quality of political debates,[16] the quality of news articles,[17] and many other measures. This means that if one goes back far enough, intelligence would measure at ridiculous heights, if humans were even tens of thousands of years old.

Really? There was a recent study that found the exact opposite of this claim.

In any case... I'm really interested to see what idiocy is being used in this site.
Perhaps humanity really does require cleansing every once in a while...



"Living fossils — jellyfish, graptolites, coelacanth, stromatolites, Wollemi pine and hundreds more. That many hundreds of species could remain so unchanged, for even up to billions of years in the case of stromatolites, speaks against the millions and billions of years being real."[19]
The high observed rate of extinctions of species[20] and harmful genetic mutations suggest a relatively short period for the existence of life rather than a long one.

Proof that evolution is real. >_>; If every living, current species were to eventually die out... can you guarantee that there will be absolutely no new ones?

Lack of genetic diversity among the Homo sapiens species. Were evolution and the old earth true, the human population would show a much larger genetic variance.[25] Some scientists have calculated that a troop of 55 chimpanzees contains more genetic diversity than the entire human race; this demonstrates that chimpanzees descended from a large initial population while humans descend from a much smaller one, which indeed we know to have been two people.

Hurrrrrr...
Renewed yet infused with apathy.
Let's just have a good time, all right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjQii_BboIk
User avatar
Maugena
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:07 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Maugena »

http://www.conservapedia.com/Irreligion ... perstition
Bahahahaha....
Also, they're bashing Carl Sagan.
I forgot who was somewhat into Sagan, but yeah... *Chants* Defense! *Clap Clap* Defense! *Clap Clap* Defense! *Clap Clap*

There have been a number of notable evolutionists who have been overweight.

THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE INCORRECT! *koff*

http://www.conservapedia.com/Jew
vs.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Muslim

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Ath ... _searching
Haw?
whatthefuck.jpg

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_10_ ... heist_nerd
4. You spend countless hours arguing with your girlfriend on the true definition of atheism and insist you are not diluting the definition of atheism given in most encyclopedias of philosophy.

LOL.

nerd/nərd/
Noun:
A foolish or contemptible person who lacks social skills or is boringly studious: "one of those nerds who never asked a girl to dance".
An intelligent, single-minded expert in a particular technical discipline or profession.

BEING SMART IS WRONG. BE MORE DISCIPLINED IN THE BRAINWASHED CATEGORY!
Last edited by Maugena on Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
Renewed yet infused with apathy.
Let's just have a good time, all right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjQii_BboIk
User avatar
Haggis_McMutton
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Haggis_McMutton »

The agnostic and evolutionist Carl Sagan was an avid marijuana smoker who claimed marijuana gave him scientific insights.[1] Sagan's agnosticism and avid pot smoking no doubt helped inspire Sagan's atheistic pseudoscience fantasy that evolution was a "fact".


brilliant.
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13330
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Conservapedia

Post by saxitoxin »

Natty, Haggis, Woodruff, Maguena - you're just irritated because you're most likely all morbidly obese.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_obesity

fucking fatties

stop typing on Conquer Club and go back to stuffing Ho-Hos down your cavernous gullets
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13330
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Conservapedia

Post by saxitoxin »

The one thing I hate about Wikipedia is, if I'm reading an article on something I often want to compare that thing to San Marino. But it takes a lot of work to look it up. That's why I use Conservapedia.

Conservapedia wrote:United States Constitution - It is the oldest written national constitution. (San Marino did not write one until the 20th century.)

http://www.conservapedia.com/United_States_Constitution


Thanks, Conservapedia!

Conservapedia wrote:Ocean - An ocean is an enormous, continuous body of salt water. The Earth contains five oceans, which cover approximately 70% of the surface. (San Marino, however, is landlocked and doesn't have access to any of them.)


Conservapedia wrote:Pythagoras - Pythagoras lived approximately from 582 to 507 BC. (This was long before San Marino was founded.)


Conservapedia wrote:Wine - Wine is an alcoholic beverage made by fermenting grapes. (San Marino is not known to produce any decent wines.)
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Conservapedia

Post by MeDeFe »

Conservapedia wrote:Obama frequently used the filibuster to obstruct the operations of government,[29] voted against the minimum wage[30][31] and debt ceiling increases,[32]

He sounds like a Tea Party senator.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Woodruff »

saxitoxin wrote:Natty, Haggis, Woodruff, Maguena - you're just irritated because you're most likely all morbidly obese.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_obesity
fucking fatties
stop typing on Conquer Club and go back to stuffing Ho-Hos down your cavernous gullets


I gotta tell you right now, this pisses me off. Ho-Ho's don't come in that great foil wrapper anymore! What the hell! Back in the foil wrapper days, Ho-Ho's were soft, moist and DELICIOUS! They were literally my favorite snack. Now, in this plastic wrapper crap, I can't even stand to look at their dried-out husks. It's sad...very, very sad.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Woodruff »

MeDeFe wrote:
Conservapedia wrote:Obama frequently used the filibuster to obstruct the operations of government,[29] voted against the minimum wage[30][31] and debt ceiling increases,[32]

He sounds like a Tea Party senator.


You meant to say "He sounds like what a Tea Party senator CLAIMS they do", right?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Timminz »

saxitoxin wrote:The one thing I hate about Wikipedia is, if I'm reading an article on something I often want to compare that thing to San Marino. But it takes a lot of work to look it up. That's why I use Conservapedia.

Conservapedia wrote:United States Constitution - It is the oldest written national constitution. (San Marino did not write one until the 20th century.)

http://www.conservapedia.com/United_States_Constitution


Thanks, Conservapedia!

Conservapedia wrote:Ocean - An ocean is an enormous, continuous body of salt water. The Earth contains five oceans, which cover approximately 70% of the surface. (San Marino, however, is landlocked and doesn't have access to any of them.)


Conservapedia wrote:Pythagoras - Pythagoras lived approximately from 582 to 507 BC. (This was long before San Marino was founded.)


Conservapedia wrote:Wine - Wine is an alcoholic beverage made by fermenting grapes. (San Marino is not known to produce any decent wines.)


San Marino: what's up with that?

User avatar
Army of GOD
Posts: 7190
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Army of GOD »

mrswdk is a ho
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Conservapedia

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Plenty of laughs, yes... except it doesn't even take much reading in these threads to see how many people have absorbed that type of thinking.

Go to the south or "Middle America" -- particularly rural areas, and you will be crying, not laughing.. and suddenly YOU will find yourself labeled the "flaming liberal".

What we need is truth, not labels.
User avatar
rdsrds2120
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:42 am
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by rdsrds2120 »

Reminds me of Uncyclopedia.

-rd
User avatar
Haggis_McMutton
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Haggis_McMutton »

inb4 Encyclopedia Dramatica
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Army of GOD
Posts: 7190
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Army of GOD »

Haggis_McMutton wrote:inb4 Encyclopedia Dramatica


RIP ED's offended page
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Symmetry »

Woodruff wrote:Conservapedia is...seriously...bizarre


The best one is the Lenski dialogue. There's a short part of the wiki about it: here

It's the point where much of the site collapsed.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Conservapedia

Post by thegreekdog »

This has to be a parody web page right?
Image
/
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:41 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by / »

I remember that, I thought almost every contributor there was a troll?
User avatar
Haggis_McMutton
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am
Gender: Male

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Haggis_McMutton »

Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Conservapedia is...seriously...bizarre


The best one is the Lenski dialogue. There's a short part of the wiki about it: here

It's the point where much of the site collapsed.


The exchange really is pretty good: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lenski_affair
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Symmetry »

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Conservapedia is...seriously...bizarre


The best one is the Lenski dialogue. There's a short part of the wiki about it: here

It's the point where much of the site collapsed.


The exchange really is pretty good: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lenski_affair


The best bits are on conservapedia itself, on the Lenski stuff talk pages. If you want to see a political purge in action, see how scientists with conservative views slowly get pushed out and censored.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Woodruff »

PLAYER57832 wrote:Plenty of laughs, yes... except it doesn't even take much reading in these threads to see how many people have absorbed that type of thinking.
Go to the south or "Middle America" -- particularly rural areas, and you will be crying, not laughing.. and suddenly YOU will find yourself labeled the "flaming liberal".


I grew up in rural "Middle America" (Nebraska, town with population of less than 1,000). I currently live in what passes for "big city" Nebraska. I don't think that's really true. Nebraska is pretty conservative, but also reasonably "intelligently conservative", in my opinion.
Last edited by Woodruff on Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Conservapedia

Post by Woodruff »

Symmetry wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Conservapedia is...seriously...bizarre


The best one is the Lenski dialogue. There's a short part of the wiki about it: here

It's the point where much of the site collapsed.


Holy crap...right below that it talks about them rewriting the Bible to take out the liberal parts? Egads!
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”