picaman wrote:Suspect Users: Madmort0 & boston redd
Game # 568083
It appears that a alliance has formed. Madmort0 has to take out Irkutsk & Kamchatka in order to attack Alaska (me). In doing so he bypasses boston redd in Mongolia(1 army) and again in China (2 Army's) in order to get to Alaska. Do you pass up an opposing country with one army and then another country opposing country with two army's, just to get to another player ? Especiallly when the "opposing" player you are leaving alone, doesn't have their borders guarded, and only has 2 or 3 other countries left. If you take that "opposing" player out you get 3 cards additional army's and attack again. I hope they both have fun because I don't play with cheaters.
You seem to base your accusation on the fact that Madmort did not attack Boston redd in asia. However several people told you why(not attackingin asia) that was in fact the best move.
To specify, taking that opposing player out would have been out of the question, since there would be 2 countries remaining in Iceland and Scandinavia each with 3 armies on it. So those 3 cards would not be a valid argument from you. As to passing over a small country that cannot hurt his own continent bonus over taking someones (e.g. yours) continent bonus of 5 is a VERY smart thing. In other words, everybody would have done it the same way, or they´d be playing a bad game.
also, you have at least implied that Madmort0 would be able to get 3 cards and passed up that opportunity to attack you. This is clearly not true. In fact, would Madmort0 have attacked the light blue´s in Asia, he might have to face you with a full set of cards..
Have you got anything else to back up why there was a secret alliance, because so far you have showed us none.
If not delete your comments and lets move on
