those people left me negative feedback just for revenge

Aivazzz · Post by **Aivazzz** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:57 pm

please remove retaliatory feedback from
reddplague for game 644262
gametime for game 596903
wannat8 for game 606679
and risk it all for game 596410

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:58 pm

please report it via the HELP page (tab up top). thanks,

treefiddy · Post by **treefiddy** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:16 pm

The majority of the feedbacks you left for those people were even more trivial than the response they gave to you.

Aivazzz · Post by **Aivazzz** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:47 pm

treefiddy wrote:The majority of the feedbacks you left for those people were even more trivial than the response they gave to you.

u think so? It's mostly imformation given to others about things that I were not positive about them. If it should be deleted the moderators can do that when they remove those retaliatory feedbacks!

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:03 pm

I agree with tree. You can't leave feedback just because someone doesn't play as quickly as you want them to, unless it's advertised as a realtime game. If you want the games to go quicker, consider only joined realtime games (set up in live chat).

Also, when we remove feedback, it stays on your feedback record and is taken into consideration if you continue to leave feedback that doesn't meet the guidelines. It's better if you don't leave trivial feedback in the first place.

treefiddy · Post by **treefiddy** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:09 pm

Aivazzz wrote:It's mostly imformation given to others about things that I were not positive about them. If it should be deleted the moderators can do that when they remove those retaliatory feedbacks!

In my eyes, Negative feedback should be saved for those truely bad experiences where one player was able to completely ruin the experience.

Informational feedbacks should be left as Neutral.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:11 pm

Yes, please save negatives for truly bad or abnormal experiences. "Informational" feedback shouldn't be given at all.

Aivazzz · Post by **Aivazzz** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:25 pm

wicked wrote:Yes, please save negatives for truly bad or abnormal experiences. "Informational" feedback shouldn't be given at all.

ok i got the idea...

Aivazzz · Post by **Aivazzz** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:28 pm

Aivazzz wrote:
wicked wrote:Yes, please save negatives for truly bad or abnormal experiences. "Informational" feedback shouldn't be given at all.

ok i got the idea...

when someone takes the full 24 hours to play his turn on purpose ( he admitted that ) I dont see why cant I leave him a negative feedback.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:30 pm

He has 24 hours to take his turns, so he's playing within the guidelines. If it was a freestyle game and he was doing it to short you out of a turn, that's different. Just relax and go when it's your turn, and don't worry about the other guy except for in "battle".

Risktaker17 · Post by **Risktaker17** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:49 pm

I have only given a few negatives all of which had to do with a bad doubles/triples partner (no communication, no fortification, just bad moves).

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:54 am

cry somewhere else!

Aivazzz · Post by **Aivazzz** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:11 am

chessplaya wrote:cry somewhere else!

lol. u probably do the same dont u? deadbeat when u lose. is that why u got so upset?