Moderator: Cartographers
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

That would be our prefernce ededbeard wrote:should we just switch over to bigimg for small images too? Or does that not make a difference?
also, I don't think you need to quote the whole post unit
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

Case sensitive... if you get it wrong - it blats your post!!!RjBeals wrote:Isn't the bbcode case sensitive?
Should it be [bigimg] or [BigImg]
Also - I really don't like this. Put the damn avatars on the left side and let the images fill to the right side !?!?!

Code: Select all
[bigimg]http://www.rjbeals.com/iceland/Iceland_large_R08.jpg[/bigimg]
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

Gimil, I don't think this will lift the size restrictions for maps in play will it. We still have to work within the confines of the size restrictions, yes?gimil wrote:
Our excellent UI coder Janiv has worked hard to develop the new and awsome [bigimg] Tag to counter the image problem. This tag allows you to either have the image spill over the forum or by simply clicking the image puts it into a scroll box.

Yes carins you will still have to work within the restrictions. This is forum code not site widecairnswk wrote:Gimil, I don't think this will lift the size restrictions for maps in play will it. We still have to work within the confines of the size restrictions, yes?gimil wrote:
Our excellent UI coder Janiv has worked hard to develop the new and awsome [bigimg] Tag to counter the image problem. This tag allows you to either have the image spill over the forum or by simply clicking the image puts it into a scroll box.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
That's kewl....no probs. What about IE7/6/5 whatever....any hear-say on what is happening with this facility for that browser?gimil wrote:
Yes carins you will still have to work within the restrictions. This is forum code not site wide
However there is still plans further down the line to look into map sizes.

Can you pm ME screen shots and ill get it looked intocairnswk wrote:That's kewl....no probs. What about IE7/6/5 whatever....any hear-say on what is happening with this facility for that browser?gimil wrote:
Yes carins you will still have to work within the restrictions. This is forum code not site wide
However there is still plans further down the line to look into map sizes.
(thanks for the poll take-down on lower egypt btw)
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
What are you talking about?qwert wrote:what hepend with signatures,still can see all signature.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Realy? I see that one part of signature its not visible.by gimil on Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:30 pm
I can see them jsut fine .
I can see your full signature. can you screen shot it and send it to me please?qwert wrote:Realy? I see that one part of signature its not visible.by gimil on Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:30 pm
I can see them jsut fine .
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Someon fix these today.I can see your full signature. can you screen shot it and send it to me please?
Code: Select all
[url=http://www.conquerclub.com/][bigimg]http://www.conquerclub.com/maps/8_Thoughts.L.jpg[/bigimg][/url]

or instantly depending on how fast the internet connection isyeti_c wrote:Actualy - yes it makes the image bigger - then it redirects you a few seconds later!!
C.