It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:58 am

I guess the British should... Keep their noses on their face!

Messed up story really. I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:00 am

Push her and run away before anyone has time to react? It takes a few seconds for people to notice what's going on and by the time anyone thinks of that you can be far away already.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:03 am

MeDeFe wrote:Push her and run away before anyone has time to react? It takes a few seconds for people to notice what's going on and by the time anyone thinks of that you can be far away already.

The article says she was "thrown" onto the tracks, not "pushed".

pimpdave · Post by **pimpdave** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:04 am

jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:05 am

pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

joecoolfrog · Post by **joecoolfrog** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:06 am

Terrible tragedy delaying all the trains like that, we really do need more guns in England so that in future kids can settle arguments with a nice clean shooting.

joecoolfrog · Post by **joecoolfrog** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:17 am

pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

Yes the voice of reason at last, common sense coupled with good to honest statistics proving that in terms of priorities the USA is absolutely spot on ;

2005-6 Death statistics in North America

From passive smoking......12 (including a pet hampster who was practically one of the family )

From accidental firearm misuse........1,412,689 ( these figures exclude another million deaths when the firearm was accidently discharged during cleaning, incredible how many firearms are cleaned in banks or when pressed against lovers heads #-o

}

Wahoo keep the country great and shoot a smoker tommorow 8-)

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:22 am

Why would you clean a loaded gun anyway?

Neoteny · Post by **Neoteny** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:23 am

MeDeFe wrote:Why would you clean a loaded gun anyway?

You never know when the government is going to oppress you.

pimpdave · Post by **pimpdave** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:27 am

Neoteny wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:Why would you clean a loaded gun anyway?

You never know when the government is going to oppress you.

Or when the fucker Deebo is gonna come by and steal your bike.

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:31 am

Neoteny wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:Why would you clean a loaded gun anyway?

You never know when the government is going to oppress you.

One of the first things we learned in military service was to make damn sure the weapon was not loaded before cleaning it. Really, you don't want to pick apart a gun that's loaded.

Neoteny · Post by **Neoteny** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:33 am

MeDeFe wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:Why would you clean a loaded gun anyway?

You never know when the government is going to oppress you.

One of the first things we learned in military service was to make damn sure the weapon was not loaded before cleaning it. Really, you don't want to pick apart a gun that's loaded.

Shit, when I carry a gun, I avoid loading it until I'm sure I'm going to use it. But maybe that's just me...

pimpdave · Post by **pimpdave** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:35 am

What Chain?

Frigidus · Post by **Frigidus** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:12 am

pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

pimpdave · Post by **pimpdave** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:30 am

Frigidus wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

Umm, or NYC, San Fran.... what other cities have indoor smoking bans?

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:31 am

pimpdave wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

Umm, or NYC, San Fran.... what other cities have indoor smoking bans?

Whole of New Jersey...

Grooveman2007 · Post by **Grooveman2007** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:34 am

jonesthecurl wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

Umm, or NYC, San Fran.... what other cities have indoor smoking bans?

Whole of New Jersey...

Bars in Minnesota...

Frigidus · Post by **Frigidus** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:44 pm

Grooveman2007 wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
pimpdave wrote:If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

Umm, or NYC, San Fran.... what other cities have indoor smoking bans?

Whole of New Jersey...

Bars in Minnesota...

Guess we're not as free as we think. :lol:

Neoteny · Post by **Neoteny** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:46 pm

Frigidus wrote:In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

Georgia, sounding off.

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:01 pm

Seriously, why are there smoking bans on trainstations anyway? How does my smoking out in the open harm these people more than the gasfumes from all the fucking cars in the city?

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:05 pm

You don't understand the significance of this people.

Those nicotine toking rambunctious young yahoos weren't just aggressive youths; they were LIZARDMEN ENFORCERS!!! They clearly gagged, bound, and hurled that woman onto the train tracks (with a trebuchet) because she visited troofer websites and was plotting to overthrow their conspiracy from the comfort of her armchair, armed with nothing but a walnut-sized brain and a load of grainy youtube footage.

That's why we need to care about this guys. Wake up!

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:15 pm

Damn those Lizardmen, damn them to hell ( or the nearest no smoking town - whichever is closest ).

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:42 pm

pimpdave wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
pimpdave wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I'm surprised no by-standards didn't grab up these punks and detain them for the police.

If it had happened in the USA, the by-standards would have had machine guns and bazookas, and would have prevented those youths from smoking.

In the US we can smoke and drink where we please, by God. Unless you're in Chicago.

Umm, or NYC, San Fran.... what other cities have indoor smoking bans?

Laramie.

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:02 pm

Isn't smoking pretty much prohibited indoors everywhere cept for Las vegas?

Nikolai · Post by **Nikolai** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:02 pm

Most US states have some kind of smoking regulation these days... Good thing, too.

It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.

Re: It doesn't pay to enforce the rules in the UK.