Moderator: Community Team
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Yeah. Then at A-level you find out that's all bollocks and that they simplified it for the benefit of morons and junkies who'd whinge they were being discriminated against if they didn't make the courses piss-takingly easy.Balsiefen wrote:'Cause most molecules have different properties to their component elements.
This is only coming from shakey GCSE level chemistry but as elements (O2 and H2) they are short of two electrons (O2 having only 6 in the outer shell, not a stable, they will then need to react to form bonds which will allow them to become stable. This is why they are flamable as many of these reactions produce heat. Water leaves each of the atoms with a full outer shell, making it stable.
Another good example of this is sodium and chlorine, two of the most unpleasently reactive elements, bring 'em together and you get table salt.
Health and fucking Safety man. Health and fucking Safety...fascistii.The Viking wrote:You didn't do the electrolysis experiment in school?
You're right. It's a lie fed to us by the NSA.DaGip wrote:Scientists claim that water is 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen.
How can two very explosive gasses make up water?
Exactly! It just doesn't make any sense! How on earth can all these payed off scientists conceive of such an elaborate hoax and get the majority of people on the planet to believe for one second that Hydrogen and Oxygen, when combined, make a stable solvent like water? Something smells fishy around here...OnlyAmbrose wrote:You're right. It's a lie fed to us by the NSA.DaGip wrote:Scientists claim that water is 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen.
How can two very explosive gasses make up water?
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Very common experiments in the US done by a large amount of professors. They are known as standard experiments ... at least at the community college where I live and the university which I go to...Pedronicus wrote:He would be fired as soon as someone discovered his name in England.
I personally would of loved to of seen / heard / felt it.
13...but who's counting?superkong wrote:i'm not sure whether this topic has been posted by a scientist who's just trying to test everyone and see if they know, or if it's been posted by a complete moron with a 14 year old's understanding of science.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Technically, only hydrogen is explosive.DaGip wrote:Scientists claim that water is 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen.
How can two very explosive gasses make up water?
Then education REALLY HAS gone down the tubes. We learned this stuff in second grade! (SERIOUSLY ... in public school in CA!!!)DaGip wrote:13...but who's counting?superkong wrote:i'm not sure whether this topic has been posted by a scientist who's just trying to test everyone and see if they know, or if it's been posted by a complete moron with a 14 year old's understanding of science.
The mass of the atoms has no relevance in this case: the weight of a olecule is not directly tied to the weight of its constituent atoms.Nikolai wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and go with "No" because you failed to specify the nature of the parts, and default for that claim would be mass. Since oxygen atoms are approximately 16 times the mass of hydrogen atoms, the correction proportion would be 2 parts Hydrogen to 16 parts Oxygen, or in pure mathematical terms 1 part Hydrogen to 8 parts Oxygen. So you're right... that 2/1 stuff is a lot of baloney.
Funnily enough, oxygen isn't explosive, just flammable. And when hydrogen explodes, it reacts with the oxygen around it (heat is the catalyst, you see) and creates water.DaGip wrote:Scientists claim that water is 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen.
How can two very explosive gasses make up water?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
That was in one of the first posts in the thread... Actually, the first post after the original post.MeDeFe wrote:NaCl anyone? Deadly when separate, used in practically all food when put together.

I don't put salt on my food. If it's cooked with it, fine, but I don't put it on myself, so your claim is bunk.MeDeFe wrote:NaCl anyone? Deadly when separate, used in practically all food when put together.
So? If I missed it a lot of others must have as well.hecter wrote:That was in one of the first posts in the thread... Actually, the first post after the original post.MeDeFe wrote:NaCl anyone? Deadly when separate, used in practically all food when put together.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
that post is so anal it's untrueHologram wrote:I don't put salt on my food. If it's cooked with it, fine, but I don't put it on myself, so your claim is bunk.MeDeFe wrote:NaCl anyone? Deadly when separate, used in practically all food when put together.