Moderator: Community Team
On a serious note, I think you're absolutely right.comic boy wrote:Sex is the most natural thing in the world so I really cannot understand why it is illegal to earn money for providing sexual services to sad and ugly people.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
And of course it would annoy all those fat ugly women who resent other people getting a bit.jiminski wrote:I tend to agree.
If you legalise it: you remove the ponces, help the heroin addicts out of their downward spiral and enforce an age limit so young girls are not exploited as easily.
By legalising it you can commit more resources to the genuinely destructive aspects to the sex trade.
comic boy wrote:And of course it would annoy all those fat ugly women who resent other people getting a bit.jiminski wrote:I tend to agree.
If you legalise it: you remove the ponces, help the heroin addicts out of their downward spiral and enforce an age limit so young girls are not exploited as easily.
By legalising it you can commit more resources to the genuinely destructive aspects to the sex trade.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
How is that relevant, a silly law is a silly law regardless of what a particular gender might think.pimpdave wrote:How many women on CC would like to see it legalized, any?
Dude, I'll go into business as a man whore. My fee schedule will be based on the woman's weight. If they can afford the extra food, they can afford the extra charge for my meat.comic boy wrote:And of course it would annoy all those fat ugly women who resent other people getting a bit.jiminski wrote:I tend to agree.
If you legalise it: you remove the ponces, help the heroin addicts out of their downward spiral and enforce an age limit so young girls are not exploited as easily.
By legalising it you can commit more resources to the genuinely destructive aspects to the sex trade.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
I suppose that is true Comic but perhaps most ladies here (assuming that prostitutes make up a very small proportion of female CC users.) may feel that legalising prostitution would demean womankind as a hole.comic boy wrote:How is that relevant, a silly law is a silly law regardless of what a particular gender might think.pimpdave wrote:How many women on CC would like to see it legalized, any?
Was this mis spelling intentional?jiminski wrote: female CC users.) may feel that legalising prostitution would demean womankind as a hole.
Are you sure you don't mean 'whole'? Though to be honest, with you it could be either..jiminski wrote:I suppose that is true Comic but perhaps most ladies here (assuming that prostitutes make up a very small proportion of female CC users.) may feel that legalising prostitution would demean womankind as a hole.comic boy wrote:How is that relevant, a silly law is a silly law regardless of what a particular gender might think.pimpdave wrote:How many women on CC would like to see it legalized, any?
And that for the sum of humanity to perceive it as ok to think of any woman purely sexually, has an overall negative effect.
They could feel that this outweighs any positives for their illegalised sisters.
That is a decent argument, though i do still think it flawed.
hehe, I see I wasn't the only one who noticed.Pedronicus wrote:Was this mis spelling intentional?jiminski wrote: female CC users.) may feel that legalising prostitution would demean womankind as a hole.
mandyb wrote:hehe, I see I wasn't the only one who noticed.Pedronicus wrote:Was this mis spelling intentional?jiminski wrote: female CC users.) may feel that legalising prostitution would demean womankind as a hole.
Are you testing me Jim?jiminski wrote:mandyb wrote:hehe, I see I wasn't the only one who noticed.Pedronicus wrote:Was this mis spelling intentional?jiminski wrote: female CC users.) may feel that legalising prostitution would demean womankind as a hole.
heheh i put it there just for you Mandy B! (Pedro was just a bonus)
I know your trying to bait me ("the first step in avoiding a trap is knowing about it's existance"--Thufir Hawat, DUNE), so I'm going to pretend that I didn't read this drivel.comic boy wrote:Sex is the most natural thing in the world so I really cannot understand why it is illegal to earn money for providing sexual services to sad and ugly people.
i will dodge the minefield of possible puns and just say 'yes baby!'mandyb wrote: Are you testing me Jim?
If so, did I pass?
Oh dearJenos Ridan wrote:I know your trying to bait me ("the first step in avoiding a trap is knowing about it's existance"--Thufir Hawat, DUNE), so I'm going to pretend that I didn't read this drivel.comic boy wrote:Sex is the most natural thing in the world so I really cannot understand why it is illegal to earn money for providing sexual services to sad and ugly people.
And that is all, repeat, all, that I have to say on the matter.