[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
2008-12-25 19:08:52 - funkiemunkey: Hello up there 2008-12-25 19:28:37 - battlemaster1: dad smells 2008-12-25 22:03:15 - mrfriendly: do you want an alliance or not james....otherwise \i will cost you 8 armies 2008-12-25 22:03:47 - funkiemunkey: no thanks 2008-12-25 22:03:51 - battlemaster1: ok 2008-12-25 22:04:12 - funkiemunkey: alex is trying for you to not attack him
They also appear to be using a secret alliance here
On behalf of myself, tagged "funkiemunkey", I am not part of any multi-accounted network and do not rely on secret diplomacy. If you can see from any of the games I have been in, I conquer all opponents unless I offer to give them such an alliance offer. Just because you do not attack another opponent that will cause a retaliation from them that will harm your success in the game is strategy. If you actually look at the games I have played with the mentioned players, you can clearly see why I did not attack such persons or the alliance agreement. I always strive to win and if I determine making an alliance will be beneficial to my outcome, I shall do so with-in game as you will see with all of my games that it is applicable for. In this individuals case, "hagardunor", I offered him the same thing as well, a temporary alliance. I did not attack many players other than to gain an advantage as in all my games, I clearly attack all opponents.
funkiemunkey and mrfriendly are cleared of being multis with each other. If you feel they have a secret alliance in your game, feel free to leave the appropriate ratings for these players. This is still noted.
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.