Skittlesandmnms wrote: Stereotyping one race is always bad. Remember the Civil War?
Whoa! And with just a few words a whole new can of worms is opened! Don't really want to get into it in this thread but the ACW wasn't really about stereotyping a race. There was a lot more to it. To say that it was simply about slavery is a very naive and miopic vision of the cause of the war.
Getting back to Professor Dingleberry in the video, I *think* he's talking hyperbole here. I can't seriously think any rational person would call for the extermination of an entire race. I guess that's why I find it funny.
WARNING: The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.
he sounded pretty serious, fortunately he won't get any backing from anyone sane. If anything he's just destroying his own credibility by making those comments.
I totally agree with people who say that if he were white and talked about exterminating black people there would be an uproar. He's probably just trying to get some media attention, and fortunately the general media is ignoring him, instead of encouraging people who try to get on TV by crossing the line like that.
Skittlesandmnms wrote: Stereotyping one race is always bad. Remember the Civil War?
Whoa! And with just a few words a whole new can of worms is opened! Don't really want to get into it in this thread but the ACW wasn't really about stereotyping a race. There was a lot more to it. To say that it was simply about slavery is a very naive and miopic vision of the cause of the war.
Getting back to Professor Dingleberry in the video, I *think* he's talking hyperbole here. I can't seriously think any rational person would call for the extermination of an entire race. I guess that's why I find it funny.
well... there was alot of things. the compromise of 1850. browns raid on that warehouse. that case where the slave owner moved up north, took his slave (i think it was douglas) then decided to go south, and the slave said no. they took it to the courts... all the way up to the supreme court and they ruled slaves arent people. but slavery was the biggest
Skittlesandmnms wrote: Stereotyping one race is always bad. Remember the Civil War?
Whoa! And with just a few words a whole new can of worms is opened! Don't really want to get into it in this thread but the ACW wasn't really about stereotyping a race. There was a lot more to it. To say that it was simply about slavery is a very naive and miopic vision of the cause of the war.
Getting back to Professor Dingleberry in the video, I *think* he's talking hyperbole here. I can't seriously think any rational person would call for the extermination of an entire race. I guess that's why I find it funny.
well... there was alot of things. the compromise of 1850. browns raid on that warehouse. that case where the slave owner moved up north, took his slave (i think it was douglas) then decided to go south, and the slave said no. they took it to the courts... all the way up to the supreme court and they ruled slaves arent people. but slavery was the biggest
wow, you definately need to buy an american history textbook. It was all about whether the North, or the South got to control the new western states, and subsequently the house and senate. Also it was state power, versus federal power. With the virginia and kentucky resolutions and Jackson's presidency states became more bold and felt they had power than the central government (in case you dont' remember this is why the articles of confederation failed)
enough with the histroy lesson, slavery does not equal killing off an entire race. This guy is talking about random wholesale slaughter. Slavery was opression for one's own ends, killing off every caucasian person is just a bunch of crazy talk that this guy's using to get on TV.
cowshrptrn wrote: wow, you definately need to buy an american history textbook. It was all about whether the North, or the South got to control the new western states, and subsequently the house and senate. Also it was state power, versus federal power. With the virginia and kentucky resolutions and Jackson's presidency states became more bold and felt they had power than the central government (in case you dont' remember this is why the articles of confederation failed)
enough with the histroy lesson, slavery does not equal killing off an entire race. This guy is talking about random wholesale slaughter. Slavery was opression for one's own ends, killing off every caucasian person is just a bunch of crazy talk that this guy's using to get on TV.
Nope, i'm not even taking an american history course this year (took AP Aermicna History last year). That was jsut basic knowledge of the american civil war. please dont' respond, and knock this thread any mroe off topic than it already is.
Machiavelli wrote:That's hilarious, especially the fact that some people were clapping
Imagine the response if it were a white person saying that
Or a white person saying that about black people.
<in jail for a hate crime no doubt>
Honestly, I think that proffesor is insane. Killing off all of one race won't make anything better.
There are stupid white people. And stupid black people. And stupid Chinese people.
But there are also smart white people. And black people...
Stereotyping one race is always bad. Remember the Civil War?
Note how he never said smart chinese people. Also, don't post anything on the Civil War unless you actually know the full truth about it. There was a lot more to it than just slavery.
Machiavelli wrote:That's hilarious, especially the fact that some people were clapping
Imagine the response if it were a white person saying that
Or a white person saying that about black people.
<in jail for a hate crime no doubt>
Honestly, I think that proffesor is insane. Killing off all of one race won't make anything better.
There are stupid white people. And stupid black people. And stupid Chinese people.
But there are also smart white people. And black people...
Stereotyping one race is always bad. Remember the Civil War?
Note how he never said smart chinese people. Also, don't post anything on the Civil War unless you actually know the full truth about it. There was a lot more to it than just slavery.
IF YOU ARE GOING TO POST READ THE WHOLE DAMN THREAD. WE ALREADY WENT OVER THIS
I am white and a fascist, but colour is of no consequence to me, I'd rather focus on exterminating stupid humans. Sorry, Skittlesandmnms, nothing personal.
cowshrptrn wrote: wow, you definately need to buy an american history textbook. It was all about whether the North, or the South got to control the new western states, and subsequently the house and senate. Also it was state power, versus federal power. With the virginia and kentucky resolutions and Jackson's presidency states became more bold and felt they had power than the central government (in case you dont' remember this is why the articles of confederation failed).
that was from a history text book
GOD HELP US! So this is what young minds of mush are being taught these days. Very, very scary.
WARNING: The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.