I guess its based on expectation rather than performance to date , the prize to me was a tad devalued once it had been given to Kissinger so it should hardly be taken at face value.
The Nobel committe cited his "vision" and that he has changed the tone of international debate. Even though he has not yet accomplished many of his international goals, they felt Obama has changed the debate enough to warrant honor.
My favorite response: "America is back in the world's good graces, but now comes the hard part"
Wow, talk about devaluing the award (if that was still possible after Carter won it). I'm not surprised that Obama would get one (not that he would deserve one), but saying a lot of words before February 1st is enough to get the award? What about all the people in the past and present who have actually done things to earn the award? Why do they get passed over by a guy who made a bunch of promises?
Congratulations to President Obama for not being President Bush.
Honestly, that's exactly the first thing I thought.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
At least Carter and Wilson did something to promote peace. All he has done is make a bunch of promises that haven't amounted to much, yet.
He promised to reduce nuclear arms with the Russians. I'm reading up on U.S.-Russian relations, the Russians will do what is in their national interest and reducing their nuclear armament isn't in their national interest.
On the Israeli-Palestinian front, they are both pissed off at him for: Israelis- Telling them to stop settling in Palestinian areas Palestinians- For not being tough on Israel for settling in Palestinian areas. So, peace doesn't look like it will come anytime soon.
He is ramping up the War in Afghanistan, attacking Pakistan and killing Pakistani civilians. The Iraq War is still going on and the U.S. will be there for years to come, no matter of what he promises.
To me we should give it to some one who really deserves it. I wouldn't care if he got it in a couple of years for actually doing something, but my question is what has he done to promote or to perserve peace in the world?
Wow this is f'n bullshat. The only reason he got this is because he is tryin to pull troops out of the east. They think that will bring peace? All that will do is make it so the fighting erupts, resulting in massacres by each side in their own countries. Not only that, but the rest of the world gets to see the U.S. tucking tail and running. Obama is seriously f'n things up if he does that.
you are entitled to your opinion... that doesnt mean its right
jbrettlip wrote:Socialists reward another socialist...no surprise there. Has any Peace prize recipient been involved in 2 wars when they won???
And I don't care who started them. He is CURRENTLY involved.
Yo, I'm really happy for you and I'ma let you finish, but Yasser Arafat had one of the best Peace Prizes of all time!
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...