0
|
Napoleonic Europe - Quadruples, No Spoils, Fog - Round 10
|
   |
 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
click to deploy here
click to assault from here
click to assault to here
click to reinforce from here
click to reinforce to here
click to reinforce to here
right-click to reinforce from here
right-click to reinforce from here
click to select/deselect
right-click to play set
right-click to play set
click again to deploy troops
click again to assault
right-click to auto-assault
right-click to auto-assault
click again to advance troops
right-click to advance zero
right-click to advance zero
click to advance zero troops
click again to reinforce troops
click again to reinforce troops
right-click to reinforce from here
right-click to reinforce from here
- Team 1
- r:alster
- g:ndrs
- b:Electricksabers
- y:VicFontaine
- Team 2
- p:Scipio79
- c:P*Funk!
- o:VioIet
- s:mackadoo
Statistics
|  |  |  |  | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team1 | ||||||
| 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Team2 | ||||||
| 4.8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 4.9 | 7 | 11 | 3 | ||
| 4.8 | 5 | 6 | 3 | ||
| 4.9 | 46 | 94 | 34 |
Game #13322746: 8 Players, Quadruples, No Spoils, Sequential, Chained, Fog
Clans Tournament: 2013 [Aug] [CC4] RA vs ATL
Label: Atlantis batch 2
Clans Tournament: 2013 [Aug] [CC4] RA vs ATL
Label: Atlantis batch 2
Help
Play States
| WAITING | CASH | DEPLOY | ASSAULT | ADVANCE | DEFERRED | REINFORCE | ELIMINATED | VICTORY | |
| Above are the possible play states of a turn. Click on each for a description. Note: the main phases of a turn are DEPLOY, ASSAULT, REINFORCE - other phases occur as they are relevant. | |||||||||
Play By Clickable Map
Deploy: Click on territory to deploy, choose number to deploy and click again to make deploymentAssault: Click on a territory to Assault from, then on a territory to Assault (right click to Auto Assault)
Advance: Click on conquered territory to choose to advance, choose number to advance, then click again to advance. Click on conquering territory to advance zero.
Reinforce: Click on a territory to Reinforce from, then on a territory to Reinforce to. Click again to confirm.
Play By Keyboard and Mouse
N Key: Skip to next game, Jump to next gameB Key: Begin Turn
E Key: End Deployment, End Assaults, End Reinforcement
L Key: Later (decline to play spoils)
W,S Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (slow)
Q,A Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (fast)
Mouse Wheel: Change troop quantity by scrolling over the selected region.
CTRL Key + Click: You can always use CTRL-click instead of the right mouse button.
Middle Click: To advance to next stage (Begin Turn, End Assaults, etc.) click the middle mouse button anywhere on the map.
- Players
- 8
- Game Type
- Quadruples
- Slots Per Player
- 1
- Initial Troops
- Automatic
- Play Order
- Sequential
- Spoils
- No Spoils
- Reinforcements
- Chained
- Fog of War
- Yes
- Trench Warfare
- No
- Round Limit
- None
- Round Length
- 24 Hours
| Players | 8 | |
| Game Type | Quadruples | In Quadruples games, four players team up against other teams. The last team alive wins. |
| Initial Troops | Automatic | Regions are randomly distributed at the start of the game and each region starts with three troops. |
| Play Order | Sequential | A player is selected at random to go first and then subsequent players follow in turn. During a team game the play order alternates between the teams. |
| Spoils | No Spoils | There are no 'spoils' in this game. |
| Reinforcements | Chained | At the end of your turn you can reinforce once from one region to another (they must be connected by regions that you own). |
| Fog of War | Yes | Fog of War masks enemy positions that are not adjacent to your forces (or your team's forces). It also masks region and zone names in the log |
| Trench Warfare | No | You can only assault from regions held since the start of your turn. If you conquer a region during your turn you cannot assault from it until your next turn. |
| Round Limit | None | |
| Round Length | 24 Hours | Each player has up to 24 hours to complete a turn. You will get an email notification when it is your turn to play. |
| Scoring | Regular | Regular leaderboard scoring is in place for this game |
Please see our Game Options Help Page for more details on all the different options.
 | Napoleonic Europe: | 82 Territories, 55 Continents, 1 Objectives, Min Reinforcements: 3 |  |
Toggles change the setting temporarily, other settings are saved on a per map basis. For site-wide settings see our Game Settings page.
2013-09-13 07:48:56 - Game has been initialized
2013-10-05 03:27:30 - mackadoo eliminated Electricksabers from the game
2013-10-09 13:23:04 - mackadoo eliminated VicFontaine from the game
2013-10-11 02:38:00 - mackadoo eliminated alster from the game
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - mackadoo eliminated ndrs from the game
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - Scipio79, P*Funk!, VioIet, mackadoo won the game
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - alster lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - ndrs lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - Electricksabers lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - VicFontaine lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - Scipio79 gained 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:09 - P*Funk! gained 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:10 - VioIet gained 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:14 - mackadoo gained 20 points
2013-10-05 03:27:30 - mackadoo eliminated Electricksabers from the game
2013-10-09 13:23:04 - mackadoo eliminated VicFontaine from the game
2013-10-11 02:38:00 - mackadoo eliminated alster from the game
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - mackadoo eliminated ndrs from the game
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - Scipio79, P*Funk!, VioIet, mackadoo won the game
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - alster lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - ndrs lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - Electricksabers lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - VicFontaine lost 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:08 - Scipio79 gained 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:09 - P*Funk! gained 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:10 - VioIet gained 20 points
2013-10-11 02:38:14 - mackadoo gained 20 points
2013-10-07 14:44:27 - alster: Personally I'm not a big fan of these games, primarily because I never play the team I'm supposed to play. Basically every game, an "account sitter" comes in and play for someone in the other team
2013-10-07 14:44:54 - alster: Don't get that. If it's true, don't see why these players are in the games in the first place
2013-10-07 14:45:17 - alster: But other than that, I don't care.
2013-10-07 23:02:30 - VioIet: 2013-09-26 11:46:03 - shaneback: vicfontaine for shaneback
2013-10-07 23:03:37 - VioIet: alstergren, how many people have sat for you in this war?
2013-10-07 23:05:12 - VioIet: and according to Genoke, I'm quiet to get attention and I speak out to get attention
2013-10-07 23:05:36 - VioIet: seems like a classic case of darned if you do, darned if you don't
2013-10-07 23:23:50 - Electricksabers: how the hell am i being dragged into this
2013-10-07 23:24:05 - Electricksabers: I've said nothing negative to anybody
2013-10-07 23:25:05 - Electricksabers: I went on a cruise with my wife for our anniversary
2013-10-07 23:25:29 - Electricksabers: I've been here for 4 years and played 12000 games, and i think i have had a sitter 3-4 times
2013-10-07 23:28:44 - Electricksabers: you can keep me out of this
2013-10-07 23:30:12 - VioIet: wow, talk about an explosive personality
2013-10-07 23:30:26 - VioIet: dude, you are not being dragged into anything. It's just your teammate seemed to be complaining about RA having account sitters
2013-10-07 23:30:58 - VioIet: so I was reminding him that ATL has account sitters as well. I think majority of clans do
2013-10-07 23:42:36 - Electricksabers: maybe next time, say hey you guys have account sitters too
2013-10-07 23:42:59 - Electricksabers: instead of just posting my name like i did something wrong
2013-10-08 00:04:34 - VioIet: point taken, but I didn't really think it would be a big deal
2013-10-08 00:05:14 - VioIet: I apologize for posting your name, and I am not meaning to drag you into anything
2013-10-08 11:11:02 - ndrs: 2013-10-08 13:10:01 - ndrs [team]: My take on the replayed turn – it was possibly in our favor; it gave us a second chance to actually win that battle. Too bad it didn't turn out that way.
2013-10-08 11:11:08 - ndrs: 2013-10-08 13:10:26 - ndrs [team]: And about the sitters. I couldn't care less who I'm playing against. Bring it on, all of you. :)
2013-10-08 11:11:12 - ndrs: 2013-10-08 13:10:47 - ndrs [team]: And gg T2
2013-10-08 21:18:56 - VioIet: thank you ndrs :) By far the best comment of the game. gg Team 1 and well played
2013-10-09 19:14:05 - alster: LOL. Sorry to say this, but my impression is that you're using an excessive amount of account sitters. I find it annoying
2013-10-09 19:14:34 - alster: As I said, not a big fan of account sitters (not in my own teams either)
2013-10-09 19:16:08 - alster: Of course it is needed from time to time, but my impression is that you over use it. Personally I don't like that since I wanna play the people I'm supposed to play. So look forward seeing these clan games being over soon
2013-10-09 19:16:38 - alster: No need for you to be defensive though. It's ok, I'm not angry or mad, I just don't like it
2013-10-09 19:16:50 - alster: GG here
2013-10-10 00:58:47 - P*Funk!: Not defensive alstergren...but I think you might not be correct with your assertion. We usually announce if we're sitting in on a move. I haven't had, or done any, in weeks. I will say we DO talk a lot to eachother before each move...perhaps the time
2013-10-10 01:00:37 - P*Funk!: that elapses during that chat....which can be a lot, is what you're mistaking for account sitters.
2013-10-10 01:01:02 - P*Funk!: Anyway, good game and...so far, good tournament.
2013-10-10 06:10:07 - VioIet: Also, I will add to what Pfunk said
2013-10-10 06:10:19 - VioIet: you guys continue to add more irony to the situation
2013-10-10 06:11:05 - VioIet: you see- we had 5 clan members go on vacation during the first week of the war, and we only had 8 active players.
2013-10-10 06:11:53 - VioIet: first two weeks. I told Genoke and chemefreak about this- got no response
2013-10-10 06:12:07 - VioIet: it turns out that Genoke sent the pm to the wrong person
2013-10-10 06:13:02 - VioIet: but anyway, when you have only 8 active players to play an entire batch of games in two wars, there is going to be a lot of sitting
2013-10-10 06:13:32 - VioIet: we would have prefered to have started the war when we had all of our players available.
2013-10-10 06:14:36 - VioIet: I ended up doing emergency recruting during Batch 1 to try to fill up the empty spots, and even with that, people still had to cover the games for our 5 players on vacation
2013-10-10 06:16:15 - VioIet: Jano, stotzi, jseal, doublediamond, asbks, mackadoo all being going for a few days at a time within a two week period was not easy on us, yet we miraculously still managed to put up a competitive fight.
2013-10-10 06:17:05 - VioIet: so yes, we did have a lot of sitting at that time, but what do you expect?
2013-10-10 06:18:44 - VioIet: In the NCC4 war, we prefered to have wait until pfunk got back from his vacation to start his games, so that you wouldn't have a lot of people sitting for him, but then there was a complaint about waiting, and saying we should've requested that sooner
2013-10-10 06:18:55 - VioIet: when I didn't know til the last minute
2013-10-10 06:19:32 - VioIet: so then for CC4, I left ATL know asap about our players going on vacation and request a different date- and no response
2013-10-10 06:19:58 - VioIet: let*
2013-10-10 06:21:24 - VioIet: but chemefreak made us start and even gave us a one game forfeit
2013-10-10 06:21:53 - VioIet: so then of course, we have to fill in our players as best we can, and account sit for the missing players
2013-10-10 06:22:20 - VioIet: I mean, what else did you expect us to do at that time?
2013-10-10 06:23:15 - VioIet: I will also add that since that time, there has been very little account sitting.
2013-10-12 01:39:21 - VicFontaine: I was pretty annoyed at first. Then I realized, because you told me, what was going on. I didn't have a problem with it.
2013-10-07 14:44:54 - alster: Don't get that. If it's true, don't see why these players are in the games in the first place
2013-10-07 14:45:17 - alster: But other than that, I don't care.
2013-10-07 23:02:30 - VioIet: 2013-09-26 11:46:03 - shaneback: vicfontaine for shaneback
2013-10-07 23:03:37 - VioIet: alstergren, how many people have sat for you in this war?
2013-10-07 23:05:12 - VioIet: and according to Genoke, I'm quiet to get attention and I speak out to get attention
2013-10-07 23:05:36 - VioIet: seems like a classic case of darned if you do, darned if you don't
2013-10-07 23:23:50 - Electricksabers: how the hell am i being dragged into this
2013-10-07 23:24:05 - Electricksabers: I've said nothing negative to anybody
2013-10-07 23:25:05 - Electricksabers: I went on a cruise with my wife for our anniversary
2013-10-07 23:25:29 - Electricksabers: I've been here for 4 years and played 12000 games, and i think i have had a sitter 3-4 times
2013-10-07 23:28:44 - Electricksabers: you can keep me out of this
2013-10-07 23:30:12 - VioIet: wow, talk about an explosive personality
2013-10-07 23:30:26 - VioIet: dude, you are not being dragged into anything. It's just your teammate seemed to be complaining about RA having account sitters
2013-10-07 23:30:58 - VioIet: so I was reminding him that ATL has account sitters as well. I think majority of clans do
2013-10-07 23:42:36 - Electricksabers: maybe next time, say hey you guys have account sitters too
2013-10-07 23:42:59 - Electricksabers: instead of just posting my name like i did something wrong
2013-10-08 00:04:34 - VioIet: point taken, but I didn't really think it would be a big deal
2013-10-08 00:05:14 - VioIet: I apologize for posting your name, and I am not meaning to drag you into anything
2013-10-08 11:11:02 - ndrs: 2013-10-08 13:10:01 - ndrs [team]: My take on the replayed turn – it was possibly in our favor; it gave us a second chance to actually win that battle. Too bad it didn't turn out that way.
2013-10-08 11:11:08 - ndrs: 2013-10-08 13:10:26 - ndrs [team]: And about the sitters. I couldn't care less who I'm playing against. Bring it on, all of you. :)
2013-10-08 11:11:12 - ndrs: 2013-10-08 13:10:47 - ndrs [team]: And gg T2
2013-10-08 21:18:56 - VioIet: thank you ndrs :) By far the best comment of the game. gg Team 1 and well played
2013-10-09 19:14:05 - alster: LOL. Sorry to say this, but my impression is that you're using an excessive amount of account sitters. I find it annoying
2013-10-09 19:14:34 - alster: As I said, not a big fan of account sitters (not in my own teams either)
2013-10-09 19:16:08 - alster: Of course it is needed from time to time, but my impression is that you over use it. Personally I don't like that since I wanna play the people I'm supposed to play. So look forward seeing these clan games being over soon
2013-10-09 19:16:38 - alster: No need for you to be defensive though. It's ok, I'm not angry or mad, I just don't like it
2013-10-09 19:16:50 - alster: GG here
2013-10-10 00:58:47 - P*Funk!: Not defensive alstergren...but I think you might not be correct with your assertion. We usually announce if we're sitting in on a move. I haven't had, or done any, in weeks. I will say we DO talk a lot to eachother before each move...perhaps the time
2013-10-10 01:00:37 - P*Funk!: that elapses during that chat....which can be a lot, is what you're mistaking for account sitters.
2013-10-10 01:01:02 - P*Funk!: Anyway, good game and...so far, good tournament.
2013-10-10 06:10:07 - VioIet: Also, I will add to what Pfunk said
2013-10-10 06:10:19 - VioIet: you guys continue to add more irony to the situation
2013-10-10 06:11:05 - VioIet: you see- we had 5 clan members go on vacation during the first week of the war, and we only had 8 active players.
2013-10-10 06:11:53 - VioIet: first two weeks. I told Genoke and chemefreak about this- got no response
2013-10-10 06:12:07 - VioIet: it turns out that Genoke sent the pm to the wrong person
2013-10-10 06:13:02 - VioIet: but anyway, when you have only 8 active players to play an entire batch of games in two wars, there is going to be a lot of sitting
2013-10-10 06:13:32 - VioIet: we would have prefered to have started the war when we had all of our players available.
2013-10-10 06:14:36 - VioIet: I ended up doing emergency recruting during Batch 1 to try to fill up the empty spots, and even with that, people still had to cover the games for our 5 players on vacation
2013-10-10 06:16:15 - VioIet: Jano, stotzi, jseal, doublediamond, asbks, mackadoo all being going for a few days at a time within a two week period was not easy on us, yet we miraculously still managed to put up a competitive fight.
2013-10-10 06:17:05 - VioIet: so yes, we did have a lot of sitting at that time, but what do you expect?
2013-10-10 06:18:44 - VioIet: In the NCC4 war, we prefered to have wait until pfunk got back from his vacation to start his games, so that you wouldn't have a lot of people sitting for him, but then there was a complaint about waiting, and saying we should've requested that sooner
2013-10-10 06:18:55 - VioIet: when I didn't know til the last minute
2013-10-10 06:19:32 - VioIet: so then for CC4, I left ATL know asap about our players going on vacation and request a different date- and no response
2013-10-10 06:19:58 - VioIet: let*
2013-10-10 06:21:24 - VioIet: but chemefreak made us start and even gave us a one game forfeit
2013-10-10 06:21:53 - VioIet: so then of course, we have to fill in our players as best we can, and account sit for the missing players
2013-10-10 06:22:20 - VioIet: I mean, what else did you expect us to do at that time?
2013-10-10 06:23:15 - VioIet: I will also add that since that time, there has been very little account sitting.
2013-10-12 01:39:21 - VicFontaine: I was pretty annoyed at first. Then I realized, because you told me, what was going on. I didn't have a problem with it.
|
|||||||
| Conquer Club is not associated with RISK online in any way. Copyright © 2006-2024 by Big Wham LLC | |||||||
