Here is the classic Revamp

by **Hatchman** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:16 am

The revamp is slightly better than the original, but it still doesn't have enough contrast for my colourblind eyes. And I've always disliked the palette. Classic is played more than any other map. It should be at least as beautiful as the South America map IMHO

by **Lone.prophet** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:18 am

wow south america isnt beautifull

by **Hatchman** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:26 am

LOL told ya I had poor eyes

by **Qwert** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:44 am

the problem will be solve that these not been secret operation of Classic rewamp.
Its these go here in map foundry from beginig,people will give hes opinion for circle and names(lighter or darken)and everything will be ok.

by **wicked** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:25 am

That issue has already been addressed qwert. :wink:

by **rebelman** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:35 am

Herakilla wrote:a lot of people hated it, but a lot of them were also saying that all you needed was to make the circles less bright and they would be happy. they also liked where the circles got moved to. me? i loved it, very clean and easy to read

this is true despite the brirghter circles this was an improvement and the issue is not a colour blind one wiki its a colours clashing one so the colour blind setting doesn't really help.

by **DiM** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:24 am

i miss the revamp. it was far better. :cry:

by **Hatchman** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:44 am

Perhaps there should be a Classic 2.0

by **rebelman** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:16 pm

hatchman wrote:Perhaps there should be a Classic 2.0

or "modern classic"

by **Kaplowitz** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:14 pm

by **tenio** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:18 pm

ah!! seizure inducing

by **Hatchman** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:48 pm

Look...

by **jwithington** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:35 pm

wicked wrote:Many more people complained about the brightness of the circles today than have ever complained about the darkness of them. Dark blends nicely with the map; light it tacky and stands out in an ugly way. I'm sure if/when it's ever retouched, maybe a fair compromise can be found.

Agreed.

by **The Fuzzy Pengui** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:41 pm

hatchman wrote:Look...

Now that's hard to see a lot of the numbers...on my PC at least.

by **edbeard** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:42 pm

well if the map had been the way the revamp was for the life of CC and we suddenly switched it to the current version, we would've had just as many complaints.

Either way, we should focus on getting something that works for everybody. not too bright, but easy to read.

by **The Fuzzy Pengui** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:46 pm

edbeard wrote:well if the map had been the way the revamp was for the life of CC and we suddenly switched it to the current version, we would've had just as many complaints.

Either way, we should focus on getting something that works for everybody. not too bright, but easy to read.

Agreed

by **Kaplowitz** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:56 pm

The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
edbeard wrote:well if the map had been the way the revamp was for the life of CC and we suddenly switched it to the current version, we would've had just as many complaints.

Either way, we should focus on getting something that works for everybody. not too bright, but easy to read.

Agreed

of course, i htink the new one is better- but could use adjustment.

It is definitely NOT horrible. people are just resistant to change.

by **jako** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:33 pm

Kaplowitz wrote:
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
edbeard wrote:well if the map had been the way the revamp was for the life of CC and we suddenly switched it to the current version, we would've had just as many complaints.

Either way, we should focus on getting something that works for everybody. not too bright, but easy to read.

Agreed

of course, i htink the new one is better- but could use adjustment.

It is definitely NOT horrible. people are just resistant to change.

very true indeed. the revamp is still better.

by **gimil** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:37 pm

Can i jsut announce that the classic TOUCHUP will be under going more work and then brought to the foundry community so that they can have their say.

Stay tuned.

by **tenio** on Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:59 pm

thats good
(and what "they" should of done in the first place)

by **MrBenn** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:38 am

gimil wrote:Can i jsut announce that the classic TOUCHUP will be under going more work and then brought to the foundry community so that they can have their say.

Stay tuned.

Do we know who is doing the 'touch up'?

[Oh, and is it worth merging all of the Classic Revamp threads in the Foundry discussion into 1, or locking the others?]

by **gimil** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:54 am

MrBenn wrote:
gimil wrote:Can i jsut announce that the classic TOUCHUP will be under going more work and then brought to the foundry community so that they can have their say.

Stay tuned.

Do we know who is doing the 'touch up'?

[Oh, and is it worth merging all of the Classic Revamp threads in the Foundry discussion into 1, or locking the others?]

THe artist in question has request their name stay out of light on this, which i and the other cartoes will fully respect.

by **Qwert** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:09 am

THe artist in question has request their name stay out of light on this, which i and the other cartoes will fully respect.

I must say that i dont respect these.What hepend with open Rewamp competition topic?You will have again problem,when you update map right in game and to no ask nobody"what you think of these changes"
He will give mine full respect if he show here,and open topic with Classic rewamp,and ask others people what think of hes job.
Its look that these person not respect others map authors,because all rewamp dont have same status like these map.
If you thinks that its ok,that some unknown person(except for mod squad)change things,and nobody can give hes comment,then its no point of giving any sugestion to person who dont want to reply to other person.

by **Coleman** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:16 am

The foundry isn't really driving this request. gimil is running block for your complaints but he really doesn't have to. This could be happening with no discussion at all.

Other revamps, and touch-ups will go a bit more like you are used to, but it is a bit different for the original maps. I have no say in how this is going either so no complaining to me about voicing this. :lol:

by **yeti_c** on Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:18 am

Coleman wrote:The foundry isn't really driving this request. gimil is running block for your complaints but he really doesn't have to. This could be happening with no discussion at all.

Other revamps, and touch-ups will go a bit more like you are used to, but it is a bit different for the original maps.

Coleman - I'm not sure that Qwert is going to understand your slang.

C.

Here is the classic Revamp

Who is online