Moderator: Cartographers
AndyDufresne wrote:I'd shake my finger on changing the gameplay drastically...or even a little bit, I think. I can imagine the out-cry about the Foundry "ruining another map." Do we want to be attached to that again?
MrBenn wrote:One of the dtruggles that the Brazil revamp has always come up against is the impassables... They are not based on anything in particular, and the original mapmaker has been fairly adamant that they should not be made to look like mountains/rivers, as there aren't any where the impassables are...
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
MrBenn wrote:He has also frequently stated that no gameplay changes can be made, and that it should be a graphical revamp only.
oaktown wrote:MrBenn wrote:He has also frequently stated that no gameplay changes can be made, and that it should be a graphical revamp only.
So again the question: do we revamp as is, or make a competing Brazil 2.0 map? I guess I'll just post what I come up with and we'll see where it goes.
Kaplowitz wrote:oaktown wrote:MrBenn wrote:He has also frequently stated that no gameplay changes can be made, and that it should be a graphical revamp only.
So again the question: do we revamp as is, or make a competing Brazil 2.0 map? I guess I'll just post what I come up with and we'll see where it goes.
BOTH.
edbeard wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:oaktown wrote:MrBenn wrote:He has also frequently stated that no gameplay changes can be made, and that it should be a graphical revamp only.
So again the question: do we revamp as is, or make a competing Brazil 2.0 map? I guess I'll just post what I come up with and we'll see where it goes.
BOTH.
and then make a 'Nations of South America' Map
edbeard wrote:you can't change gameplay. It's as simple as that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users