Moderator: Community Team
The Neon Peon wrote:Alright
1. that taking bombarding for a card makes the game boring because you just sit and do nothing for a long time (not yours, but stated)
2. instructions imply that you should not get spoils for bombardment
3. bombarding for spoils makes no sense since you do not get anything by bombarding a territory, and only if you take over it
The Neon Peon wrote:I personally would not expect it to become an enemy when I bombard it.
The Neon Peon wrote:A neutral is not your opponent last I checked.
The Neon Peon wrote:I think they took it as common sense that if the territory is a neutral it either
1. reconverts to neutral
2. nothing happens
both are logical assumptions, since what else will happen?
iambligh wrote:This category is for suggestions which will make the game more enjoyable for all. I highly doubt that anything will be changed in the way of game rules which EXPERIENCED players have been playing for years and continue to enjoy playing!
Just step back and consider that one for a second.
Now, you can continue to fight this useless, pointless battle...
When you get beat by two teammates who deploy on the same player, I suppose you'll consider that a loophole that's being exploited and start a thread about it here. Most noobs just play, learn, and adapt their strategies; you guys would rather change the rules than get better, it seems.
iambligh wrote:This category is for suggestions which will make the game more enjoyable for all. I highly doubt that anything will be changed in the way of game rules which EXPERIENCED players have been playing for years and continue to enjoy playing!
Just step back and consider that one for a second.
iambligh wrote:What I'm trying to say is:
This forum serves a purpose, I agree, but there's a snowball's chance in hell that bombardment rules will be changed. I tried to make an example by saying you could make an argument that forting your troops to an ally could somehow be considered a "loophole", because that player wouldn't have the means to accrue so many troops on his own, or deploying on non-contiguous regions could be considered "too unrealistic", lol, because in a real battle you wouldn't be able to blah blah blah...
The bottom line is, this is a game, and the rules of this game allow for acquiring cards, or "spoils" by bombarding neutrals, and more importantly, the current rules work very well for too many people for them to be changed. I'm sorry that they don't work for you, but that will pretty much be the end of it.
ronin56003 wrote:The gameplay allows for it. The rules say it doesn't.
So let's say that by some miracle I'm right, because everyone is used to it they shouldn't change it... Lame excuse.
The gameplay behind bombard needs to be changed.
If you don't like it, don't play it. (oh that's sounds familar...)
Bones2484 wrote:At least we can agree that something needs to change to avoid this in the future.
GenuineEarlGrey wrote:Thank you, Neon. Here's my go at your side of the argument.
1. We don't want to change the bombardment rules.
2. There's a risk to bombarding and it should be rewarded.
3. Its a good strategy.
4. People are ignorant if they do not know how to use the re-bombardment startegy.
5. Its not clear how changing the rules would effect each map.
6. If you don't like the bombardment rules you should go and play on some other map.
7. Bombardment is an advanced game startegy.
What have I missed? Would you like to refine it!
I'll have a ponder at yours.
E.G.
iambligh wrote:There's nothing wrong with bombardment rules, so they doesn't need to be changed.
iambligh wrote:There's nothing wrong with bombardment rules, so they doesn't need to be changed.
The Neon Peon wrote:iambligh wrote:There's nothing wrong with bombardment rules, so they doesn't need to be changed.
The only thing you left out was that the instructions could be clearer.
GenuineEarlGrey wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:iambligh wrote:There's nothing wrong with bombardment rules, so they doesn't need to be changed.
The only thing you left out was that the instructions could be clearer.
Sounds like your telling us that rather than risk following the argument through, you'd like to just say its all very well but things should just stay the way they are. Takin the easy way out?!
Do you really want to go down that path, again.The Neon Peon wrote:that I won't get anywhere until you...
The Neon Peon wrote:"popular feature"
ronin56003 wrote:Then why haven't the mods fixed the instructions? 2 sec change... I'll shut up then.
Bones2484 wrote:Because [the mods] take forever to change anything?
GenuineEarlGrey wrote:Do you really want to go down that path, again.
iambligh wrote:If you'd like to propose a modified set of rules where cards can only be earned by occupying a new region as a NEW OPTION for games, then this is certainly the place to do it. The proprietors of the site are always looking for new features to add which players might enjoy, but I can't imagine they would CHANGE something that a great many players on the site already enjoy.
ronin56003 wrote:Then why haven't the mods fixed the instructions? 2 sec change... I'll shut up then.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users