my bad, you're right.
that makes it a lot easier
Moderator: Community Team
xroads wrote:I would suggest making it a yearly medal. At the end of the year, whoever won the most points on the map wins, min 25 games. Gold, Silver, Plat.
3 medals for each map, given at the end of the year.
Would need a scoreboard for each map to let everyone know how they ranked (been suggested before)
xroads wrote: Gold, Silver, Plat.
Elaterate wrote:New to this site but I like this idea. Although maybe just show who's the best on each map instead of making a competition. Would be nothing more then personal braking rights without any controversy. If you want to award medals do it for anyone that could achieve a win % of X amount with a minimum number of games played being X amount. Cheers GC.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Elaterate wrote:New to this site but I like this idea. Although maybe just show who's the best on each map instead of making a competition. Would be nothing more then personal braking rights without any controversy. If you want to award medals do it for anyone that could achieve a win % of X amount with a minimum number of games played being X amount. Cheers GC.
Welcome to CC mate. You'll find a lot of people support this suggestion purely because it's a chance to get more medals. There are several players who's #1 priority is getting as many medals as they can, so if there's talk of a new medal implementation they'll more often than not support it. I agree with your initial suggestion though.
CatchersMitt14 wrote:IcePack wrote:xroads wrote:CatchersMitt14 wrote:I think the actuality of this getting implemented will really come down to how the criteria structures works for this medal. We will not be getting any new medals added in the current medal system that are not issued manually. Wham said he has to overhaul the engineering of the medal structure before he will add any more medals as in their current state it's a large amount of precessing and creating a drain on performance. I have not had any indication from him that he plans to do that in the foreseeable future as I have recently tried to add a new medal.
Quote "I really really like this, but it will never ever happen"
Adding a new medal is one option, utilizing existing medals is another. Hence the whole determining / working out the details on a suggestion and criteria, in order for suggestion(s) to be considered and implimented. This is why many of the existing suggestions typically fall short / fail.
This suggestion could potentially work within the existing medal structure and those details would have to get worked out.
That's exactly my point, he's not going to make changes to the existing structure unless he overhauls the entire thing and he indicated that's not currently on the agenda. I'm adding information to the conversation so they can see how to structure their medal so it increases the likelihood of implementation.
Adding a new medal verses using an old one isn't the issue. The issues are HOW the stats are calculated and HOW the medals are issued. Nothing that is structured in the same way as any of the medals on the "Medal Stats" page will see the light of day until the entire structure is re-engineered.
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
betiko wrote:IcePack wrote:What’s to stop someone from playing the minimum 25 and then stopping w impossibly high win %?
It would reset the next year?
How would your win rate work? Would the number of opponent be taken into consideration?
Like if you have 20% win rate in 5 player games it's like having a 50% on 1vs1?
CatchersMitt14 wrote:IcePack wrote:xroads wrote:CatchersMitt14 wrote:I think the actuality of this getting implemented will really come down to how the criteria structures works for this medal. We will not be getting any new medals added in the current medal system that are not issued manually. Wham said he has to overhaul the engineering of the medal structure before he will add any more medals as in their current state it's a large amount of precessing and creating a drain on performance. I have not had any indication from him that he plans to do that in the foreseeable future as I have recently tried to add a new medal.
Quote "I really really like this, but it will never ever happen"
Adding a new medal is one option, utilizing existing medals is another. Hence the whole determining / working out the details on a suggestion and criteria, in order for suggestion(s) to be considered and implimented. This is why many of the existing suggestions typically fall short / fail.
This suggestion could potentially work within the existing medal structure and those details would have to get worked out.
That's exactly my point, he's not going to make changes to the existing structure unless he overhauls the entire thing and he indicated that's not currently on the agenda. I'm adding information to the conversation so they can see how to structure their medal so it increases the likelihood of implementation.
Adding a new medal verses using an old one isn't the issue. The issues are HOW the stats are calculated and HOW the medals are issued. Nothing that is structured in the same way as any of the medals on the "Medal Stats" page will see the light of day until the entire structure is re-engineered.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users