Moderator: Clan Directors
Lindax wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:TOP vs ATN
51 games
TOP wins, caffeine quits CC
ATN wins, Paul quits CC
Make it 50 games. In case of a tie they both quit CC....
Lx
Donelladan wrote:It was obviously a joke... Take it easy Magnus.
MagnusGreeol wrote:- Some are aloud to joke like that, Some aren't. Would it seem right if say KA joked like that? When you have any sort of decision power you can't joke like that.
-\MGM/-ā
MagnusGreeol wrote:- Some are aloud to joke like that, Some aren't. Would it seem right if say KA joked like that? When you have any sort of decision power you can't joke like that.
-\MGM/-ā
betiko wrote:MagnusGreeol wrote:- Some are aloud to joke like that, Some aren't. Would it seem right if say KA joked like that? When you have any sort of decision power you can't joke like that.
-\MGM/-ā
hey do yourself a favour and use your brain. As you can imagine some here are on this site as their full time job such as BW and KA, and others are just users like you and me helping a community on their free time. If you don't like it go apply to become a mod and impose your own standards; but be ready to do it 365 a year, to receive barely any thanks and a lot of Dbags comment to deal with such as the one you just did when you dare use the joke mode.
MagnusGreeol wrote:Lindax wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:TOP vs ATN
51 games
TOP wins, caffeine quits CC
ATN wins, Paul quits CC
Make it 50 games. In case of a tie they both quit CC....
Lx
- I'm only interested in what BW & KA have to say about this statement from one of their "legit volunteers". Bollocks.
-\MGM/-ā
MagnusGreeol wrote:- Some are aloud to joke like that, Some aren't. Would it seem right if say KA joked like that? When you have any sort of decision power you can't joke like that.
-\MGM/-ā
rockfist wrote:Love them or hate them I don't think we should be encouraging people to quit given our situation. There is room for all kinds of personalities on this game.
Lindax wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:TOP vs ATN
51 games
TOP wins, caffeine quits CC
ATN wins, Paul quits CC
Make it 50 games. In case of a tie they both quit CC....
Lx
Keefie wrote:MagnusGreeol wrote:- Some are aloud to joke like that, Some aren't. Would it seem right if say KA joked like that? When you have any sort of decision power you can't joke like that.
-\MGM/-ā
I can assure you that Lx is on CC's list of approved comedians, so your statement is invalid.
Where do folks get ideas like this from
iAmCaffeine wrote: seeing as TOP are all talk and no action.
PaulatPeace wrote:Lindax wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:TOP vs ATN
51 games
TOP wins, caffeine quits CC
ATN wins, Paul quits CC
Make it 50 games. In case of a tie they both quit CC....
Lx
When one accepts a position of authority, one also accepts the responsibility of conducting oneself in a manner befitting the title. Inherent in this role is the obligation to rise above the nasty, mean-spirited remarks disguised as humor. Comments such as this are sadly disappointing!
PaulatPeace wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote: seeing as TOP are all talk and no action.
So...let me see...in our 16 game battle the score ends up TOP 13 - ATN 3. Extrapolate that out to however many games in whatever size war you chose....TOP still wins by a landslide. Yes...we are all talk and no action!
GoranZ wrote:PaulatPeace wrote:Lindax wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:TOP vs ATN
51 games
TOP wins, caffeine quits CC
ATN wins, Paul quits CC
Make it 50 games. In case of a tie they both quit CC....
Lx
When one accepts a position of authority, one also accepts the responsibility of conducting oneself in a manner befitting the title. Inherent in this role is the obligation to rise above the nasty, mean-spirited remarks disguised as humor. Comments such as this are sadly disappointing!
Crybaby
How old are you?
PaulatPeace wrote:GoranZ wrote:PaulatPeace wrote:Lindax wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:TOP vs ATN
51 games
TOP wins, caffeine quits CC
ATN wins, Paul quits CC
Make it 50 games. In case of a tie they both quit CC....
Lx
When one accepts a position of authority, one also accepts the responsibility of conducting oneself in a manner befitting the title. Inherent in this role is the obligation to rise above the nasty, mean-spirited remarks disguised as humor. Comments such as this are sadly disappointing!
Crybaby
How old are you?
I see you are also adept at name-calling! I am 63 years old GoranZ. Old enough to have taught my children and grandchildren that name-calling is a childish behavior that we outgrow with maturity! How old are you sir?
rockfist wrote:CL Results matter. Period. Agreed!
TOFU plays to win. Period. (and yup we don't always win, so if you want to make that retort, we admit it). Agreed!
Everyone should always play to win. Period. Agreed!
A League competition is not the same as a war. Period. Agreed!
You can't extrapolate a CL result to a full war. You can make some assumptions based on it, but it does not equate to a full war. In a league competition if you know someone is one of your strongest competitors you can send 8 of your very best maps, where you perceive your opponent to be weak. There is no way that TOFU's 30 best maps are as strong as our 8 best maps against anyone and TOP's or ATN's, or anyone else's aren't either. We played RET in CL and won our home maps 7-1, we have no expectation of winning our home games at that ratio in CC. Agreed...but I will offer this idea for you to consider:
Let's say TOFU is playing against ATN in a war. Yes, TOFU will have it's 8 best maps and ATN will have their 8 best maps. But...then TOFU will have it's 8 second best maps and ATN will have their 8 second best maps...and so on...! The bottom line is that the same players will be playing in all these games and each clan will always try to send their very best players and maps out into war. And every clan will try to take advantage of a perceived weakness in the other clan. If TOFU were to beat ATN in a 16 game CL match-up (a combination of both home and away games) by a score of 13-3...then I would wager they would also soundly beat them in a 41 game war. Why? Because if you have the ability to dominate in 16 games...you probably have the ability to dominate in 41 games! If it were only 1 game, or 2 games or 3 games...ok that would not be enough to make an adequate evaluation on...but 16 games...that is enough...especially if you know a clan has the depth of quality experienced players on a large # of competitive maps. Just my opinion, but I believe it is logically sound.
PaulatPeace wrote:
Let's say TOFU is playing against ATN in a war. Yes, TOFU will have it's 8 best maps and ATN will have their 8 best maps. But...then TOFU will have it's 8 second best maps and ATN will have their 8 second best maps...and so on...! The bottom line is that the same players will be playing in all these games and each clan will always try to send their very best players and maps out into war. And every clan will try to take advantage of a perceived weakness in the other clan. If TOFU were to beat ATN in a 16 game CL match-up (a combination of both home and away games) by a score of 13-3...then I would wager they would also soundly beat them in a 41 game war. Why? Because if you have the ability to dominate in 16 games...you probably have the ability to dominate in 41 games! If it were only 1 game, or 2 games or 3 games...ok that would not be enough to make an adequate evaluation on...but 16 games...that is enough...especially if you know a clan has the depth of quality experienced players on a large # of competitive maps. Just my opinion, but I believe it is logically sound.
PaulatPeace wrote:Brother, I am done with your ugliness, profanity, mean-spirited nature and downright lies
Users browsing this forum: No registered users